Cut the BS, Govels....

 

The US Costitution does not identify all basic human rights

Thanks for the insight Rose.....If that's all it takes to stop your lunatic rants....then I will use it myself.....I guess you claim that all the perps in the stories you post are, or were I should say, good legal gun owners prior to the commission of their crimes. How could you possibly know that? I will say up front some probably had not given anyone any reason to prohibit their owning guns prior to the crimes in question, but that can be said of anything..... how do you know every owner of a automobile is legally driving said vehicle? or that said vehicle was legally purchased? How about the person that snaps and grabs a knife from the kitchen or a ball bat and stabs or slits a persons throat or beats them to death? what do you do about them........how about the person that beats their infants until they die...or the person that runs their car into a crowd and kills? Bottom line Rose....you simply do not know by looking at someone if they are going to snap........ No Psychologist or Psychiatrist is going to be able to identify every single person that could at some point in the future snap..... so your arguments hold no water........The best defense is a good offense....and that means meeting force with force....and if I have anything to say about it... with overwhelming force..... I want to come out the winner..... I ain't interested in parity..... I want to be able to at least match, and better yet, outmatch the person that comes at me......... It has been said many times Rose.... you choose to go around unarmed that is your choice.....I choose to arm myself and hope the day never comes that I am forced to use my guns in my or my families defense..............but use them I will and have them I will.........And die for my rights.....you betcha!  

LOL@ROSE,

  If I had only known it was that easy. Use any excuse you want to bow out of a debate that you cannot possibly win. There are so many reasonable and logical arguments against restrictive gun bans and gun control measures that your overly emotional entreaties just look like silliness in comparison. I am reminded of when a certain other poster (She who shall remain nameless)' would be on the loosing end of a debate about marijuana legalization. After all her Partnership for a Drug Free America, ONDCP and DEA myths, lies and talking points were rebutted and refuted, and the facts were presented, she would invariably end up wailling: "What about the children?". LMAO!

 

  Sorry, but I have the Constitution Of the United States of America  the Alaska State Constitution, Natural law, and a duty to my family, community and nation on my side. All you have is emotional BS.

 Sorry, but I have the Constitution Of the United States of America  the Alaska State Constitution, Natural law, and a duty to my family, community and nation on my side. All you have is emotional BS.

 

{ AF: You got fuck all but your big mouth and bad temper. You can't win a debate when you refuse to debate buster. You lose because you can't understand anything but your own position and that has nothing to do with the debate. You and the idiot Rbshoots never answered a question or discussed anything brought up. All you did was slap yourself on the back! Keep doing that loser! Too funny!}

what exactly is there to discuss? what was brought up that I or AF or anyone else that believes in our right to bear arms has not discussed? you madame have brought nothing to the table to discuss...... your complete lack of understanding of gun laws in this country makes it almost impossible to discuss anything concerning gun rights with you...........so when you have a legit topic of conversation.... I, and I am sure others will be happy to discuss it with you.............

Rose,

  LMAO! My temper? You seem to be the only one around here that is getting angry. I'm just mildly amused and mildly suprised at your naivete. I offer reasonable points and you respond with emotionalism. My big mouth? Give it a break, little sister. You are the one that ignores basic facts like the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, the Supreme Court decisions that affirm that right, the very basic fact that an armed citizen has a much greater chance against an armed criminal or overreaching government, or in my case, an angry grizzly or moose in my yard, just to whine about some "Slaughter of Innocents" all the while ignoring the fact that an armed, law abiding citizen is far better equiped to defend against that sort of thing than an unarmed victim. You may enjoy the helpless victim role. That's just dandy if that is what you are into. I'll keep my guns. My family will be far safer for it. My community will be safer for it, and my rights will be better defended for it. Enjoy that victim status. It goes well with your overly emotional responses to facts, reason, logic and common sense. I only hope that your willingness to be a victim doesn't lead to your martyrdom on the alter of gun control. Keep it up! You are a hoot when you get all emotional and nonsensical.

  My, my, my! Getting a bit emotional are you? Angry? Unable to make a real point? Resorting to WAAAH!? LMAO!

 

 

Good Lord! Yoy really are Cowboy...aren't you?

I still like you enough to invite you to my board AlaskanFree: Check us out.

 

 

Rose,

  No, I'm not DC3Cowboy. As a matter of fact, DC3Cowboy and I happen to disagree on many things. He is an apallogist for the Bush administration and the Iraq war debacle. I think you know darned well that I am neither.