MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
firearms1[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME HOME  
  "THE FIRING LINE"  
  RULES OF FIREARMS1  
  CHATROOM  
  Emoticons  
  Emoticons #2  
  Pictures  
  Survival Library  
  Critical Gun Links and Info  
  Spell Checker  
  How To Fire The Shot  
  Use of the Sling  
  Recommendations  
  Links  
  Documents  
  Events   
  Downloadable Targets  
  FFL INFO  
  The Patriot Post  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : D.C.: 2nd Amendment does not apply here  
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameAdvnelisgi®  (Original Message)Sent: 1/7/2008 6:43 AM
D.C.: 2nd Amendment does not apply here

WASHINGTON - The Second Amendment's provisions protecting the right to keep and bear arms apply only to the federal government, not the 50 states and the District of Columbia, lawyers for the nation's capital argued Friday in a written brief to the U.S. Supreme Court



First  Previous  2-9 of 9  Next  Last 
Reply
Recommend  Message 2 of 9 in Discussion 
From: RuralnvSent: 1/8/2008 10:08 PM
All I can say is vote accordingly this year. Protect your Second Amendment rights.

Reply
Recommend  Message 3 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamearak1547Sent: 3/19/2008 10:21 AM
It will be interesting to see the outcome from the Supreme Court.

Reply
Recommend  Message 4 of 9 in Discussion 
From: krazyjoeSent: 3/23/2008 2:47 PM

If  DC has one one the highest crime rates in the nation, why would the police and the President of the USA need guns and arm men to protect themselves. Don't make sense to me, Unarm everybody there. Then next year we can move in and make DC a big grave. Now that makes sense.    Or do I sound like a politician . Oh well. When the families of the right people die, They'll arm themselves and change the law.

Just a thought!


Reply
Recommend  Message 5 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname444HalSent: 3/23/2008 6:18 PM

There’s one place where they’re considering allowing judges to carry a firearm in their courtroom without a permit. Imagine that ! An untrained person sitting in the room facing jurors, lawyers and dozens of other people, packing a gun. Same Judge would throw the book at you for having a gun in your own house because of that one in a thousand chance that a bullet may fly through a wall and hit the neighbors cat !

Unbelievable !


Reply
Recommend  Message 6 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLazarusUsaSent: 3/29/2008 1:25 AM
JUDICIAL BENCHMARKS: HEARINGS ON DC'S GUN BAN
 
District of Columbia v. Heller, a Supreme Court case that will be decided
in the next few months, will determine whether "the People" mentioned in
our Constitution really means "the Government" when it comes to the right
to keep and bear arms. The Justices heard arguments last Tuesday.
 
The Second Amendment to the Constitution states: "A well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Using the arguments posited by
attorneys for the District of Columbia, this really means only the militia
should be armed, not the people. Of course, this argument ignores the plain
language of the Amendment, the historical context of the word "militia" (every
able-bodied adult male) and several hundred years of practice and precedent.
 
For more than 30 years, DC has banned all handguns, the cheapest and most
common weapon of self-defense, and requires homeowners to either disassemble
or unload and lock up all other firearms. The (un)reasonableness of a total
ban on handguns, however, is just one of many questions the Court will decide
in this landmark case. In the hearing, it seemed the Justices understand
the right belongs to individuals, leaving the question as what constitutes
reasonable regulation.
 
As the NRA-ILA reports, 31 state attorneys general, many former senior DOJ
officials, and Congress have filed amicus briefs opposing DC's position in
the case. "The congressional brief had the largest number of co-signers
of a congressional amicus brief in American history," the NRA-ILA said,
"with 250 House Members, 55 Senators and the Vice President of the United
States, acting in his capacity as President of the Senate." Perhaps the most
encouraging sign came during the hearings last Tuesday when Justice Anthony
Kennedy said, "[T]here's a general right to bear arms quite without reference
to the militia either way." It appears the "swing" Justice may have his head
on straight for this one. After all, it is clear that this case dealing with
what former Justice Joseph Story called the "palladium of the liberties of
a republic" is one of utmost importance to our nation.

Reply
Recommend  Message 7 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameShovelhead8080Sent: 4/9/2008 8:14 PM
Sadly, we have no one to vote for this year, they are all of the same mind set on our bill of rights. Our 2nd amendment I'm affraid will be lost no matter who gets in office.

Reply
Recommend  Message 8 of 9 in Discussion 
From: SteveSent: 4/10/2008 2:45 AM
Shovelhead,
Vote for conservative Senators and Representatives, and just maybe by the grace of God we can prevent the worse from happening. I cannot believe that we have three anti-gunners (recall that McCain wanted to close the gun show loophole and register everyone who attended gun shows whether they bought a gun or not) running for Prez. I fully expect a major terrorist event this summer on American soil, and my betting is that George Soros is paying off street trash to create mayhem at the Republican National Convention. If at all possible, attend one of the April 19th weekend Appleseed events, and team up with as many conservative Americans as possible before the General Election. Maybe this is the year we write in George Washington or even Donald Duck....

Reply
Recommend  Message 9 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameShovelhead8080Sent: 4/15/2008 2:11 AM
Hey Steve, We need to write in someone thats for sure. I remember when I was a small boy,( I turnned 60 Saterday,) my Dad would always tell us to vote for the first timer, as once they are in office for over one term they have learned how to rip us off. So get rid of them all and lets start over.

First  Previous  2-9 of 9  Next  Last 
Return to General