firearms1

Important Announcement

The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More

EDITORIAL EXEGESIS

"Gun Control: Barack Obama says he won't take folks' guns away as long as

they're hunters. But when the hunted are his constituents, well, that's

different: He opposes concealed carry and the right to self-defense. There's

something about an election that brings out the sportsman in a Democratic

presidential candidate. Recall John Kerry's sudden fondness for hunting

four years ago. And speaking in Idaho earlier this year, Barack Obama

told the crowd, 'We got a lot of hunters in the state of Illinois, and I

have no intention of taking away folks' guns.' Except he does. In a 1996

questionnaire, Obama wrote that he 'supported banning the manufacture,

sale and possession of handguns.' He says now that the survey was filled

out by an aide who misrepresented his views. Yet his record since then is

consistent with that view. Never mind that Illinois and the other 49 states

have a lot of two-legged predators... On the subject of the total ban on gun

ownership in the District of Columbia, a Second Amendment case before the

U.S. Supreme Court, the Nov. 23 Chicago Tribune said Obama believes in the

right of local communities to enact common sense laws to combat violence and

save lives. Obama believes the D.C. handgun law is constitutional... Obama's

Web site says: 'He will protect the rights of hunters and other law-abiding

Americans to purchase, own, transport and use guns for the purposes of

hunting and target shooting'... Not, apparently, for you to protect your

wife and children." ---Investor's Business Daily

How could this country become so ignorant that the three candidates for President are basically embarassing on their best days, and someone so inexperienced in public office so close to winning the the Dem nomination. Obama is bad news for everyone, and especially the law abiding gun owners. I cannot believe the people in Illinois are so stupid as to vote for such a weak Senator rated as the most liberal in a liberal zoo.

Consider this. If he wins the Democrat nomination he will look very inexperienced when he goes up before McCain. Right now he is our only chance to break up the Clinton dynasty. I predict that he will self destruct when he has to debate against an old hand like McCain.

Sarge, What makes you think McCain is any better? Look at his record. As far as I'm conserned all 3 of the front runners are the same. We need a true conservative patriot to run. But then our propaganda medias and the powers that be won't allow it.

You are right on that Shovel head (Harley?) but I am thinking this:

First: he is a Republican.

Second: he will have the Republican congress backing him but also controlling him.

Third: If you have seen him on the stage with his young wife and considering his age and health he may not be around long enough to bother us. We need to make sure he picks a good conservative vice president.

the lesser of 3 evils.... well I always said the worst republican is better than the best democrat. Time to put up or shut up I guess.

Important Announcement The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
firearms1	[email protected]