MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
firearms1[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME HOME  
  "THE FIRING LINE"  
  RULES OF FIREARMS1  
  CHATROOM  
  Emoticons  
  Emoticons #2  
  Pictures  
  Survival Library  
  Critical Gun Links and Info  
  Spell Checker  
  How To Fire The Shot  
  Use of the Sling  
  Recommendations  
  Links  
  Documents  
  Events   
  Downloadable Targets  
  FFL INFO  
  The Patriot Post  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Supreme court Ruling  
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 3 in Discussion 
From: Muskrat  (Original Message)Sent: 6/26/2008 4:42 PM

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Americans have a right to own guns for self-defense and hunting, the justices' first major pronouncement on gun rights in U.S. history.

The court's 5-4 ruling struck down the District of Columbia's 32-year-old ban on handguns as incompatible with gun rights under the Second Amendment. The decision went further than even the Bush administration wanted, but probably leaves most firearms laws intact.

The court had not conclusively interpreted the Second Amendment since its ratification in 1791. The amendment reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

The basic issue for the justices was whether the amendment protects an individual's right to own guns no matter what, or whether that right is somehow tied to service in a state militia.

Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for four colleagues, said the Constitution does not permit "the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home."

In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority "would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons."

He said such evidence "is nowhere to be found."

Joining Scalia were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. The other dissenters were Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter.

'Landmark victory'
The ruling quickly became fodder for the presidential race. Sen. John McCain lauded the decision in a written statement, calling it a "landmark victory for Second Amendment freedom in the United States."

The Republican presidential hopeful criticized his rival Barack Obama's stance on the issue, saying the Democrat had refused to sign a statement calling for Thursday's ruling.

"Unlike the elitist view that believes Americans cling to guns out of bitterness, today's ruling recognizes that gun ownership is a fundamental right �?sacred, just as the right to free speech and assembly," McCain said.

The White House also praised the ruling.

"We are pleased by the Court's decision upholding Americans right to bear arms. We look forward to reading the ruling in detail," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said.

Capital's strict gun law
The capital's gun law was among the nation's strictest.

Dick Anthony Heller, 66, an armed security guard, sued the District after it rejected his application to keep a handgun at his home for protection in the same Capitol Hill neighborhood as the court.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in Heller's favor and struck down Washington's handgun ban, saying the Constitution guarantees Americans the right to own guns and that a total prohibition on handguns is not compatible with that right.

The issue caused a split within the Bush administration. Vice President Dick Cheney supported the appeals court ruling, but others in the administration feared it could lead to the undoing of other gun regulations, including a federal law restricting sales of machine guns. Other laws keep felons from buying guns and provide for an instant background check.

></SCRIPT>
 
 

Scalia said nothing in Thursday's ruling should "cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons or the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings."

The law adopted by Washington's city council in 1976 bars residents from owning handguns unless they had one before the law took effect. Shotguns and rifles may be kept in homes, if they are registered, kept unloaded and either disassembled or equipped with trigger locks.

Opponents of the law have said it prevents residents from defending themselves. The Washington government says no one would be prosecuted for a gun law violation in cases of self-defense.

></SCRIPT>
  More from msnbc.com



First  Previous  2-3 of 3  Next  Last 
Reply
Recommend  Message 2 of 3 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLazarusUsaSent: 6/27/2008 12:22 AM
Thak God!  It's about damn time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Recommend  Message 3 of 3 in Discussion 
From: GlockmanSent: 6/29/2008 11:05 PM
Great decision.  It certainly took long enough.  I just can't believe that the vote was 5-4.  It should have been 9-0.  It's sad that liberals believe that rights of "The People" exist in some sections of the constitution, but not in others.  They should accept all the amendments equally or move to some other country with less freedoms.  Maybe China is taking new immigrants.  Mexico might be more to their liking.  It is closer.