MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Madeleine McCannContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME  
  LATEST NEWS  
  PJ FINAL REPORT  
  Member Messages  
  ►►SITE MENU◄◄  
  ►► MESSAGES �?/A>  
  All Messages  
  General  
  Messages For Maddie  
  Madeleine  
  Off Topic  
  Breaking News  
  Pet Memorials  
  MEMBER WELCOME  
  MEET THE MANAGER  
  ►►SUMMARIES◄◄  
  ►►�?MEDIA ◄◄�?/A>  
  NEWSPAPERS  
  Telegraph  
  Newspaper Thread  
  MAY Reports  
  JUNE Reports  
  SUN BOARD  
  TIMES BOARD  
  Daily Mail  
  MIRROR BOARD  
  GUARDIAN BOARD  
  Deleted EXPRESS  
  News Archives  
  News Articles  
  TV Program Links  
  Transcripts  
  TV News  
  Video Links  
  JOURNALISM  
  News Sniffer  
  ►INVESTIGATION�?/A>  
  Interviews  
  Suspicious  
  Re-enactment  
  Subliminal & Propaganda  
  Contrived Abduction  
  Facts  
  'Evidence'  
  Libel Threats  
  Lies  
  Quotes  
  Theories  
  Forged Photos?  
  McCann Travels  
  Timelines  
  FUND INFO  
  Fund  
  FUND INCOME / EXPENSES  
  Fund Compilation  
  FUNDRAISING  
  Fund 'Sources'  
  ►►►PEOPLE◄◄�?/A>  
  Kate McCann  
  Key People  
  Clarence Mitchel  
  Government  
  Brian Kennedy  
  Jon Corner  
  Metodo 3  
  Photofit  
  People MISC  
  Witnesses  
  Family  
  Unknown People  
  Esther McVey  
  Pol. Judiciaria  
  Tapas 7  
  Backers  
  ►►►► INFO◄◄�?/A>  
  Weather  
  The Law  
  Beachy  
  thentherewere4  
  Beachy Posts  
  AMBER ALERT  
  Information  
  M & E Children  
  Statistics  
  HUMAN BEHAVIOUR  
  Body Language  
  ►► CHAT ROOM�?/A>  
  Chat User Guide  
  ►► OPINIONS◄◄  
  Coldwater  
  HiDeHo  
  Jon Gaunt  
  Comments to Note  
  Gerry's Blog  
  Personal Attack  
  Misc Blogs  
  bb2002  
  Tabs poem  
  ►►WEBSITES◄◄  
  mccannfiles.com  
  Website Links  
  ►►PICTURES◄◄  
  Pictures  
  Manager Graphics  
  Pics fo Posting  
  Photo Curiosity  
  Backgrounds  
  ►►FORUMS◄◄  
  Digital Spy  
  Websleuths  
  THE 3 ARGUIDOS  
  3A Thread Lists  
  3A at Brussels Conference  
  3A Smiles  
  3A Ref. Threads  
  3A Distributions  
  3A Leaflets  
  MIRROR FORUM  
  M F Threads  
  Memorable Posts  
  Great Posts  
  Lost Pages  
  ►E-MAIL ADDYS�?/A>  
  ►►COMPUTER ◄◄  
  COMPUTER HELP  
  Computer Tips  
  HOW TO TIPS FOR 3A  
  3A How To Post  
  Avatars  
  ►►�?GAMES◄◄�?/A>  
  Brain Teasers  
  Time Wasters  
  Interesting Fact  
  Funnies  
  Points To Ponder  
  Nostalgia  
  Amateur Sleuth  
  For Skeptics  
  Estelle's Posts  
  Search  
  Priest  
  Remember Madeleine  
  Songs & Lyrics  
  'Source' Info  
  British Police  
  Sheree Dodds  
  PR & Spin  
  Trial  
  Your Web Page  
  3A Here To Stay  
  Documentaries  
  Diary  
  TEAM McCANN  
  Mgzne Interviews  
  TV INTERVIEWS  
  Robert Murat  
  Oprah  
  AMARAL'S BOOK  
  Fridge  
  McCanns History  
  McCann 'Defence'  
  Martin Brunt  
  Statements  
  Apologies  
  Investigate Fund  
  Statement Tables  
  MISC Web Pages  
  Millenium /Tapas  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Esther McVey : MF - Esther McVey's resignation
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzy  (Original Message)Sent: 2/17/2008 3:51 PM
 

Esther McVey's resignation
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 12, 13, 14  Next
  
  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Fretful_Porpentine
 
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 357
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:09 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Didn't Esther McVey confirm to own of the Mirror posters that the fund was not being used to fund Met3? Anyone else recall this? Somewhere around October I think.
 
Back to top      
 
 
jackieL
 
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 1263
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:11 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="Fretful_Porpentine"]Didn't Esther McVey confirm to own of the Mirror posters that the fund was not being used to fund Met3? Anyone else recall this? Somewhere around October I think.[/quote]
===========================
Yes. I think it's in that long thread started by Nbrado. I'll dig around for it.
 
Back to top      
 
 
ShuBob
 
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 4051
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:11 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I have very little doubt that this story is true!
 
Back to top      
 
 
Fretful_Porpentine
 
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 357
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:12 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Thanks
I think these fund director resignations are important, and that the Met3 farce may be at the bottom of it.
 
Back to top      
 
 
redsquare
 
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 725
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:13 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="Fretful_Porpentine"]Didn't Esther McVey confirm to own of the Mirror posters that the fund was not being used to fund Met3? Anyone else recall this? Somewhere around October I think.[/quote]
***
??? Are you sure? So why are they bleating about the money running out? Where is it going?
 
Back to top      
 
 
ShuBob
 
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 4051
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:13 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="Fretful_Porpentine"]Didn't Esther McVey confirm to own of the Mirror posters that the fund was not being used to fund Met3? Anyone else recall this? Somewhere around October I think.[/quote]
===================================================
Indeed and she also famously denied that the McCanns had asked to use the Fund to fund their legal case!
 
Back to top      
 
 
Fretful_Porpentine
 
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 357
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:17 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="ShuBob"][quote="Fretful_Porpentine"]Didn't Esther McVey confirm to own of the Mirror posters that the fund was not being used to fund Met3? Anyone else recall this? Somewhere around October I think.[/quote]
===================================================
Indeed and she also famously denied that the McCanns had asked to use the Fund to fund their legal case![/quote]
It now seems that Met 3 were subcontracting someone (Hogan?) to do what was essentially legal grunt work on witness statements. I doubt this was the most egregious use of funds either.
 
Back to top      
 
 
diddy
 
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 1712
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:20 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
That piece seems quite damning.
On the face of it, I don´t understand why they money to look for Madeleine.
Apart from the fact that she is more than likely no longer alive, it´s up to the police to look for her.
The "detectives" they hired fared no better.
If they want to keep publicity up so that she is not forgotten, I understand that to a point, but as time goes on, there is less chance of her being alive, less chance of her being spotted, and apart from the "eye defect", it won´t be that long before she has perhaps changed beyond recognition of any photo, so that even that sort of publicity unfortunately becomes worthless.
So in some ways, I don´t understand what they "need" more money for.
Anybody know why people have resigned from the board?
Is it the film, perhaps?
 
Back to top      
 
 
jomk2
 
Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 279
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:21 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I don't believe the resignations will be to do with Met3, in which case they would have occurred way back. This is eitherto do with the blood in the car being Madeleines or something we don't know about yet.
It's also very encouraging news, it shows cracks have formed in the Ivory Tower at last and are now big enough to result in people bailing out of the McCann bubble. From here it is only one step to seeing any of the Tapas 9 break ranks.
project save@ss is now in effect! 
 
Back to top      
 
 
Blamhappy
 
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
Posts: 2318
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:22 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I think you're right, jom. It's probably the blood in the car. Other things can be explained, but the blood is damning. Even a friend of the McCanns would be questioning things after that.
 
Back to top      
 
 
IrishEyes
 
Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 314
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:22 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I think the movie deal is a smoke screen for the fact that board members have resigned. Mitchel knows that the movie deal will cause an uproar and take the heat off the resignations.
Note how they want the arguido status lifted so that they can get sympathy money rolling in.  
 
Back to top      
 
 
jackieL
 
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 1263
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:26 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="ShuBob"][quote="Fretful_Porpentine"]Didn't Esther McVey confirm to own of the Mirror posters that the fund was not being used to fund Met3? Anyone else recall this? Somewhere around October I think.[/quote]
===================================================
Indeed and she also famously denied that the McCanns had asked to use the Fund to fund their legal case![/quote]
===================
I've just bumped the Thread which refers to this. On page 22 on 8th November, you'll see bjr quoting Nbrado as follows:
bjr says: <<Nbrado has made his telephone call to Esther McVey re the Fund and information of call is posted below. Thanks Nbrado.
**RESULT**
I have spoken with esther this morning.
The original number she gave me kept going through to an answerphone I went through to the switchboard and waited on hold... this time we spoke.
There is no recording of the call as esther could not agree to this and personally I do not blame her.
I raised my initial question regarding why there was an omission of the fact that the mortgage payments had been stopped when their status changed.
Esther did not comment on why it was omitted but went through the fund guideline information and basically pointed out that it was ok up to the point they changed status to use the fund money to pay such things.
nothing we didnt already know just the legal stance stance that in the guideline under supporting the family it was ok to use the money up until the point that their legal status changed.
she told me that at no point did gerry and kate ask for money.
I raised the point that gerry found it frustrating not to be able to use the money for legal defence and therefore would suggest that HE or someone asked.
esthers response was he must have been taken out of context by the reporter.
make of that what you will.
Next I raised the question how do we get a refund.
Esthers answer was
" I do not want to give anyone false hope but I honestly dont know "
She does not know at this time the standing for people to get a refund however she is having a board meeting on the 14th of november and has promised to raise the question and formulate a response to those wishing to obtain one.
She did point out obviously that anyone seeking a refund would have to provide proof they donated but at this time she again stated she does not know yet but will on the 14th how the public can make a request of a refund.
Esther actually asked me a question!
why do people feel they need a refund what have they been saying.
I told her that its a moral issue and that people expected the money to fund a search not a mortgage and the hiring of companies that do not specialise in missing persons has people upset.
her answer to this was that brian kennedy and richard branson are footing the bill for the investigators at the spanish phone company and current campaign actions in process.
so officially people brian and richard are paying ALL bills at the moment not the fund.
I thanked her for her time and she will contact me after the 14th to advise what the fund board situation is on refunds.
until then as esther said no false hope people...>>
 
Back to top      
 
 
biryana
 
Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 60
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:26 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="urcrazy"]We have no idea if it's true.
Does it not strike anyone as a bit odd that they would release this ifno, and no-one picks up on it?[/quote]
****
[qote="redsquare"] Possibly because the murky inhabitants of the media and PR worlds are as thick as thieves.
I absolutely agree redsquare. There is total silence from both BBC and ITV news regarding anything to do with the McCanns. When it was anounced a few days ago that they were still the prime suspects at the 8 month stage and that their arguido status was not going to be lifted there was not even a mention. Instead we had bulletin after bulletin showing Britney Spears being carted off to hospital. I know which item I would consider to be of most importance to the British public and it ain't Britney Spears.
 
Back to top      
 
 
Billie3
 
Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 446
Location: Canada
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:30 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="IrishEyes"]I think the movie deal is a smoke screen for the fact that board members have resigned. Mitchel knows that the movie deal will cause an uproar and take the heat off the resignations.
Note how they want the arguido status lifted so that they can get sympathy money rolling in.  [/quote]
Sympathy money? Don't bet on it! 
 
Back to top      
 
 
radiolady
 
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 453
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:31 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="biryana"][quote="urcrazy"]We have no idea if it's true.
Does it not strike anyone as a bit odd that they would release this ifno, and no-one picks up on it?[/quote]
****
[qote="redsquare"] Possibly because the murky inhabitants of the media and PR worlds are as thick as thieves.
I absolutely agree redsquare. There is total silence from both BBC and ITV news regarding anything to do with the McCanns. When it was anounced a few days ago that they were still the prime suspects at the 8 month stage and that their arguido status was not going to be lifted there was not even a mention. Instead we had bulletin after bulletin showing Britney Spears being carted off to hospital. I know which item I would consider to be of most importance to the British public and it ain't Britney Spears.[/quote]
======
But you also have to understand that as there is such a washing machine of spin going on, editors are as spun out as the rest of us....they are now at the stage of saying "with so much hearsay and rumour about we are staying clear until something comes from the mouth of the PJ or the McCanns'.
 
Back to top      
 
 
Display posts from previous:   
 
       Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 12, 13, 14  Next 
Page 2 of 14


First  Previous  2-6 of 6  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/17/2008 3:54 PM
Page 9
 
Esther McVey's resignation
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
  
       Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
odarbn
 
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 498
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:07 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
nope sorry confused for someone else.
 
Back to top       
 
 
cazzacazza
 
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Posts: 127
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:10 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
It was NBrado that was liasing with Esther Mcvey not spudgun and as far as I recall we never got to hear what the outcome was of the questions that were collated for the board meeting. Although that happened to be around the time the firworks flew on here and splinter forums were created, so I may have missed the follow up.
Anyway, odarbn..... that is NBrado in reverse.... is that you? 
 
Back to top      
 
 
odarbn
 
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 498
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:14 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
eh?
nope its a mistaken case of identity bit like the egg man.
we are in touch though.
 
Back to top       
 
 
Sickened
 
Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 87
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:16 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="ShuBob"]Esther's resignation has been confirmed:
Mr Mitchell confirmed reports that one of the directors of the fund, former GMTV presenter Esther McVey, had resigned from the board, but denied it was because of any rift with the McCanns.
He said she wanted to concentrate on her role as a Conservative parliamentary candidate and was also about to start studying for a demanding MBA qualification.
"She has a lot of commitments and realised she could not devote the time she wanted to the fund," he said.
"She felt the New Year would be a good time for the change, and spoke to Kate about her decision.
"Kate and Gerry were disappointed but they both understood her reasons. She is an old friend of Kate's and continues to support the fund."
Mr Mitchell said other directors might also want to "rotate" their position on the board, as it had created a lot more work than was originally anticipated in May.
..[/quote]
Thanks so much for that Shubob.
I wonder why this little gem was hidden away in the Daily Mail report in the way it was, if there was such an innocent explanation. I wouldn't have thought that the duties imposed on fund directors (signing off on mortgage payments etc) were so onerous that it prevented you being a Conservative candidate, or studying for an MBA? I have some colleagues who are studying for MBA in conjunction with full time jobs, in fact as I understand it that is what normally happens.
Has life as a Conservative MP suddenly got more demanding for Esther then? I am not aware of a General Election in the offing?
I wish we could get a statement from someone other than Clarence.
If Esther was brave enough to state her real reasons for jumping ship, I might even be tempted to vote Conservative next time! 
And I would love to see what this directors "rotation" actually means in practice. This REALLY smells like spin Clarence, but very grateful for the confirmation that the jumping ship is actually true.
 
Back to top      
 
 
JTennison
 
Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Posts: 370
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:18 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Before I go, my turn to cook tonight...I'd just like to say that this isn't meant to be a personal dig at Esther - she just happens to be on the fund board that I and many others would like some answers from. And as she has gone very quiet after her resignation - I don't think it is too much to ask her if she could explain her reasons for leaving the fund.
Keep this thread and the other one going ShuBob. I'd love to log back on tomorrow, and find that you and some of the others have got a bit further on finding out what has happened to the 'Fund'.
See ya
JT
 
Back to top      
 
 
ShuBob
 
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 4282
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:25 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="JTennison"]Before I go, my turn to cook tonight...I'd just like to say that this isn't meant to be a personal dig at Esther - she just happens to be on the fund board that I and many others would like some answers from. And as she has gone very quiet after her resignation - I don't think it is too much to ask her if she could explain her reasons for leaving the fund.
Keep this thread and the other one going ShuBob. I'd love to log back on tomorrow, and find that you and some of the others have got a bit further on finding out what has happened to the 'Fund'.
See ya
JT[/quote]
=================================================
Would do my best, JT 
Have a good evening 
 
Back to top      
 
 
jackieL
 
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 1412
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:28 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
update: Just tried Esther's work no. and mobile again, but no reply. I have texted her and left messages on voicemail to call me.
Esther, if you're reading this sweetheart, we would like to know:
1) Is it true you resigned?
2) Which other directors resigned?
3) What is the reason for your resignation and the reason of the other directors?
Just text me...................
Cheers.
Jackie
 
Back to top      
 
 
HAL
 
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 5227
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:30 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Esther the Unsteady & Unready...certainly took her long enough to jump off of the board.
Personally, I wouldn't have touched a directorship with a 10-foot pole, and I would have gone in a flash as soon as the request was made for the Fund to pay the arguidos's legal fees.
 
Back to top      
 
 
Gilly37
 
Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 566
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:34 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="HAL"]Esther the Unsteady & Unready...certainly took her long enough to jump off of the board.
Personally, I wouldn't have touched a directorship with a 10-foot pole, and I would have gone in a flash as soon as the request was made for the Fund to pay the arguidos's legal fees.[/quote]

************************
I posted this on another thread but will try it here too.
Excuse my ignorance but, would it make a difference to votes if another family member was put on the board.
This instance when John Mccann and Brian Kennedy left the meeting.
 

The directors of the Fund discussed this today. The two family directors, Brian Kennedy and John McCann withdrew from the meeting when the decision was made. Esther Mcvey chaired the meeting.
 
Back to top      
 
 
csiturkey
 
Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 540
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:34 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
There's talk that the fund is closing down , so as to avoid showing the funds accounts at the end of the financial year (they have to be made public)
Rumour has it that the Mccanns are looking for more control over 'their' money.
If the fund closes they may be able to hide all the years accounting details.
 
Back to top      
 
 
ShuBob
 
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 4282
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:36 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="csiturkey"]There's talk that the fund is closing down , so as to avoid showing the funds accounts at the end of the financial year (they have to be made public)
Rumour has it that the Mccanns are looking for more control over 'their' money.
If the fund closes they may be able to hide all the years accounting details.[/quote]
================================================
Surely, they won't be able to hide ANY details from the police????
 
Back to top      
 
 
HAL
 
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 5227
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:41 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="Sickened"] And I would love to see what this directors "rotation" actually means in practice. This REALLY smells like spin Clarence, but very grateful for the confirmation that the jumping ship is actually true.[/quote]
Heh, heh. Rotation and spin--similar, lol.
Like fighting over the best deckchairs on the Titanic, innit?
 
Back to top      
 
 
Sickened
 
Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 87
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:43 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="HAL"][quote="Sickened"] And I would love to see what this directors "rotation" actually means in practice. This REALLY smells like spin Clarence, but very grateful for the confirmation that the jumping ship is actually true.[/quote]
Heh, heh. Rotation and spin--similar, lol.
Like fighting over the best deckchairs on the Titanic, innit?[/quote]
JUST like that Hal!
 
Back to top      
 
 
jackieL
 
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 1412
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:50 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
People like Bmen took a big risk. He phoned Cameron McCrae in the early summer, at the height of Maddy Mania, and sussed out the Paypal scam.
That guy took a hell of a bashing on here, from the pro-McCanns. I often think of him........he posted he was very ill.......Bmen, are you there??
Look what you achieved. You pushed at least one of them off the gravy train. Well done. You did well.
Justice for Madeleine. Rest in peace.
 
Back to top      
 
 
HAL
 
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 5227
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:52 pm    Post subject:    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[quote="Gilly37"][quote="HAL"]Esther the Unsteady & Unready...certainly took her long enough to jump off of the board.
Personally, I wouldn't have touched a directorship with a 10-foot pole, and I would have gone in a flash as soon as the request was made for the Fund to pay the arguidos's legal fees.[/quote]

************************
I posted this on another thread but will try it here too.
Excuse my ignorance but, would it make a difference to votes if another family member was put on the board.
This instance when John Mccann and Brian Kennedy left the meeting.
 

The directors of the Fund discussed this today. The two family directors, Brian Kennedy and John McCann withdrew from the meeting when the decision was made. Esther Mcvey chaired the meeting.[/quote]
The objects of the fund are:
"Madeleine’s Fund was set up to:
1..Find Madeleine;
2..Support the Family; and
3..Bring the abductor or abductors to justice "
I'm pretty sure that anything that the McCanns propose would be rubber stamped (the McCanns hired Metodo and then presented the Fund with the facts of what they'd done), and jerry-built has certainly not been shy about parading his arrogance and deceitfilness before the public.
 
Back to top      
 

Reply
 Message 3 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/17/2008 4:14 PM
Page 10
Esther McVey's resignation
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy
Author Message
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Gilly37



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 515

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:57 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="HAL"][quote="Gilly37"][quote="HAL"]Esther the Unsteady & Unready...certainly took her long enough to jump off of the board.

Personally, I wouldn't have touched a directorship with a 10-foot pole, and I would have gone in a flash as soon as the request was made for the Fund to pay the arguidos's legal fees.[/quote]


************************

I posted this on another thread but will try it here too.

Excuse my ignorance but, would it make a difference to votes if another family member was put on the board.

This instance when John Mccann and Brian Kennedy left the meeting.



http://bringmadeleinehome.com/fund/


The directors of the Fund discussed this today. The two family directors, Brian Kennedy and John McCann withdrew from the meeting when the decision was made. Esther Mcvey chaired the meeting.[/quote]

The objects of the fund are:
"Madeleine’s Fund was set up to:
1..Find Madeleine;
2..Support the Family; and
3..Bring the abductor or abductors to justice "

I'm pretty sure that anything that the McCanns propose would be rubber stamped (the McCanns hired Metodo and then presented the Fund with the facts of what they'd done), and jerry-built has certainly not been shy about parading his arrogance and deceitfilness before the public.[/quote]


***********************



Thanks for that Hal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
widowan



Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 210

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:07 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="UtterlyBaffled"][quote="TheAcademic"]I agree with Tigger, Esther McVeigh is guilty of only one thing, being Kate McCann's friend.

Was it not Esther McVeigh that liaised with spudgun about questions to raise at the fund's board meeting?

It is never too late to do the honorable thing and step down on principle, if that is what she has done, she deserves our respect, not our desire to see her ruined.[/quote]

I hope Esther has extricated herself from this mess in time to save her career. She is at least guilty of incredible gullibility, as she could have surely seen through the McCanns as long ago as most of us did - a lot of information is out there for those who are determined to find it, provided in the main by our wonderful Portuguese friends. I suppose we should give her the benefit of the doubt that she was trying to support her friends, but she is a trained barrister and should have exercised better judgement IMO. The Bar Council don't look kindly on things like this either, so hopefully she will become a politician where it wouldn't matter particularly.[/quote]

Yeah, the mcCann bandwagon looked like a good bet when Beckham, Rowlings etc were jumping on it - what's not to like? Lots of people had the wool pulled over them and I think the idea that these people made a stupid mistake and now are paying the ulitimate price for it made people feel sorry for them -

In the UK isn't being on a BOD a fiduciary responsibility or don't you have some personal liability if you are on the Board? I wonder if she wants off before the money runs out. Friend or no friend of Kate's, that is asking a lot of an aspiring politician or of anyone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HAL



Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 5085

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:14 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="widowan"]
[
In the UK isn't being on a BOD a fiduciary responsibility or don't you have some personal liability if you are on the Board? I wonder if she wants off before the money runs out. Friend or no friend of Kate's, that is asking a lot of an aspiring politician or of anyone.[/quote]

Should there be charges and convictions, will the UK voters hold McVey's directorship against her?

In Canada, someone running for public office has to be squeeky clean (a totally different matter once they've been elected to office--once entrenched, it's hard to get them out). Do the parties in the UK review the records of new candidates in the same way?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jomk2



Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 333

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:17 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

HAL Yes generally politicians 'start out as clean as possible' although it doesn't necessarily stop skeletons in the closet coming back to haunt them later. However recent scandal normally means a candidate falls out of favour or is put out to pasture for a while until trying again when memory fades.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HAL



Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 5085

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:36 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Thks, jomk2.

So Esther may end up really rueing what was likely an error of judgement?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
odarbn



Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 295

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:59 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="HAL"]Thks, jomk2.

So Esther may end up really rueing what was likely an error of judgement?[/quote]

agreed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Reply
 Message 4 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/17/2008 4:16 PM
Page 10 cont...
 
LogicMan



Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 4648

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:02 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="urcrazy"]We have no idea if it's true.

Does it not strike anyone as a bit odd that they would release this ifno, and no-one picks up on it?[/quote]

=========

Just thought I'd drag this one up from earlier .....

Not having a very good day are you........

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jackieL



Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 1327

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:03 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="widowan"][quote="UtterlyBaffled"][quote="TheAcademic"]I agree with Tigger, Esther McVeigh is guilty of only one thing, being Kate McCann's friend.

Was it not Esther McVeigh that liaised with spudgun about questions to raise at the fund's board meeting?

It is never too late to do the honorable thing and step down on principle, if that is what she has done, she deserves our respect, not our desire to see her ruined.[/quote]

Credit where credit's due. Bmen, a fantastic poster who swam against the tide, had the courage to ring Cameron MaCrae, father of the stooge Calum, and quiz him about Paypal payments etc.

Nbrado took up the baton and phoned Esther McVey before the Board meeting of 14th November.

I fired Bmen's bullets at her......the rest is history.

WELL DONE BMEN!!!!!!!!! Where are you?? Come on the forum and take a bow!!
Justice for Madeleine!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
observed



Joined: 31 Oct 2007
Posts: 947

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:11 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="LogicMan"][quote="urcrazy"]We have no idea if it's true.

Does it not strike anyone as a bit odd that they would release this ifno, and no-one picks up on it?[/quote]

=========

Just thought I'd drag this one up from earlier .....

Not having a very good day are you........

.[/quote]

-------------------------------------------

No.

The fact that other directors have resigned is another nail in the coffin.

Let's face it, the claim that it's more work than they expected is, as Clarrie puts it, ludicrous.

Of course, Glenfield has a new CEO arriving later this year, and I would imagine that one of his requirements was that Doug Skehan would stop raising money for the personal expenses of a fellow employee..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
karmakat



Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 649

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:19 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Can someone please sum up which BOD members ("key" the article said) resigned besides McVey?

This is rats leaving a sinking ship - FINALLY!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
endreas



Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 4575

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:11 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="jomk2"]HAL Yes generally politicians 'start out as clean as possible' although it doesn't necessarily stop skeletons in the closet coming back to haunt them later. However recent scandal normally means a candidate falls out of favour or is put out to pasture for a while until trying again when memory fades.[/quote]

it has to be money or sex scandal, it seems anything else can slip past.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
catinthehat



Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Posts: 727

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:13 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="LogicMan"][quote="urcrazy"]We have no idea if it's true.

Does it not strike anyone as a bit odd that they would release this ifno, and no-one picks up on it?[/quote]

=========

Just thought I'd drag this one up from earlier .....

Not having a very good day are you........

.[/quote]


When all you are doing is trying to deny an innocent child justice and the right to be laid to rest officially I dont think this poster deserves a good day tbh Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
endreas



Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 4575

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:14 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="HAL"]Thks, jomk2.

So Esther may end up really rueing what was likely an error of judgement?[/quote]

i doubt it.

anyone suggesting there is any impropriety can be sued if she is a candidate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
endreas



Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 4575

PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:16 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="LogicMan"][quote="urcrazy"]We have no idea if it's true.

Does it not strike anyone as a bit odd that they would release this ifno, and no-one picks up on it?[/quote]

=========

Just thought I'd drag this one up from earlier .....

Not having a very good day are you........

.[/quote]

hey logic, are you stooping....?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
McNEMESIS



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 207
Location: spirit of divine retribution
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:21 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Hey endreass! Your P45 is in the McPost!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
  

Reply
 Message 5 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/17/2008 4:31 PM
PAGE 13
 

Esther McVey's resignation
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 12, 13, 14  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy
Author Message
View previous topic :: View next topic  
lynnkx



Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Posts: 2031

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:20 am    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Maybe they have resigned because they have a responsibility to ensure that the fund money is spent wisely - and not on scammers who actually take the mick out of the little girl they are being paid to search for [the d*cks said they knew where she was Twisted Evil - and would get her home for Christmas Twisted Evil Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad ]

Not only that - the 'fund' is said to be employing another set of d*cks - which cannot be reasonably justified - surely Confused

That - plus the dna in the boot - plus the Tapas 9 statements that _the_police_are_NOT_HAPPY_WITH Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HAL



Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 4973

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:26 am    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="Blamhappy"][quote="HAL"]Thks, ShuBob. Resigned and didn't attend. or resgned at the meeting?

There are reports that more directors want to jump ship, so the word of what she had done or hearing her say it would have had quite an impact.[/quote]

I don't get it - why can't the others just refuse to show up?[/quote]

I believe that another poster said that they were asked to stay on until replacement directors could be found.

I don't know if there is a requirement under UK law for a private company to have a minimum number of directors, or what would happen if all but the family members resigned.

In North America, it is not all that unusual for all of the directors of a troubled publicly trading company to resign if they figure that they have or may have exposure to financial liability.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShuBob



Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 4049

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:24 am    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Any official word from Ms McVey yet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JTennison



Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Posts: 306

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:08 am    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Morning ShuBob and everyone. Mighty pleased to see that the thread's alive and well.

Interesting to hear that Ms McVeigh - not only has she experience of the political world, the Broadcasting world, runs her own PR Agency, but she's a trained Lawyer to boot - according to her No 1 fan Tigger who shouldn't ever think about a job in PR because she's just plainly detailed how Esther can never be described as somebody who would be easily duped.

Face it Tigger - she went into this with both eyes wide open. Now is the time for her to face her critics and explain where all the public's kindly donated money has gone - only then will she be able to redeem some kind of dignity in my eyes.


JT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chalice



Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 1485

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:42 am    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

The meeting is tonight , 9 th january . Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
terrybull



Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 2485

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:51 am    Post subject: Re: Esther McVey's resignation Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="redsquare"]Yes, I know this has been touched on in other threads but I believe it deserves its own thread.

We need to know why she resigned. .[/quote]

++++++++++++++++++++++

No, redsquare, I *don't* need to know why she resigned.

I think you're confusing me with someone who gives a damn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tigger1



Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 2067

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:15 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Morning JT,
In response to your earlier post, I would like to say that I totally respect your opinion and would ask you to totally respect mine Wink . It is after all an opinion. There is no need to take such an arrogant tone which in truth is not appreciated. Noone wants justice for Maddy more than me, noone wants to see those responsible come to book and I hope this is the beginning of the end of Kate and Gerry, to lump others who were meaning well in their NASTY SMELLY SEWER is a tad strong.

I will leave this thread and all others regarding Ms McVey, as it would appear I am in the minority. I was just trying to give her the benefit of the doubt as I think Gerry and Kate have duped her along with the rest of the nation. Like I say it is just my opinion and it is still a free country isn't it?

She quietly turns and leaves quietly,closing the door gently Wink

Reply
 Message 6 of 6 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/17/2008 4:32 PM
Page 13 cont...
 
Hare



Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 348

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:46 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

I'm no fan of Ester McVey but I can sympathize with her position.

I suspect that Ester's motives where partially selfish, there's nothing wrong in wanting to generate some good publicity for someone in her position. She weighed up the risks, and decided it was a safe bet.

Esters position of the board is that of spokesperson. Ive been watching this case quite closely, and yet I can only really remember 3 or 4 occasions where Ester actually made official (and contradictory) statements on behalf of the fund. The workload associated with the fund surely cant be that great.

We are now told, Ms McVey wishes to spend more time pursuing her political ambitions, and studying for an MBA qualification. The fact that she thinks that these are more important, than assisting a childhood friend locate an allegedly abducted child sends out a negative message. Its even more inappropriate to resign at a time where her friend has been wrongfully accused by an allegedly corrupt foreign police force. The reason Ester got into this was to help her friend, and yet in her friends darkest hour, when she needs the greatest possible support, her friend very publicly withdraws that support. She'd certainly make a great MP, someone you can rely on when the chips are down !

Ester could well have remained a director, simply as a figurehead. She did not need to take an active part in the day to day running of the fund.

Clarance Mitchell is a man stuck in the 80's whose grasp of public relations is outdated and inappropriate, but even he understands the message that Esters resignation sends out.

Ms McVey certainly understands the score, and she definately understands the message this sends out. So why the hell would she want to send that message.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lynn



Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 4081

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:49 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

I bet Ms. McVey is pleased she's out of it today - Clarence has just asked the public to just send money in an envelope marked to the McCanns in rothley "it'll get there!" Sending cash to the parents, and not the fund? Well, this is new....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShuBob



Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 4049

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:56 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

Has Ms McVey spoken out about her resignation yet? What's stopping her? She was very quick to defend the use of the Fund in the past after all!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
catinthehat



Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Posts: 713

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Esther McVey's resignation Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="terrybull"][quote="redsquare"]Yes, I know this has been touched on in other threads but I believe it deserves its own thread.

We need to know why she resigned. .[/quote]

++++++++++++++++++++++

No, redsquare, I *don't* need to know why she resigned.

I think you're confusing me with someone who gives a damn.[/quote]

I don't think so - I don't think ANYONE - outside of your ego thinks you "give a damn".
Most of us realise that in fact - you DON'T give a damn about any of this - certainly NOT about the missing child. You never have - never will. What's important to YOU is being "right" - and even that luxury is going to be denied you - they will be questioned and CHARGED - both which you "swore" was NEVER going to happen - shows how much YOU know eh smart guy?
Hay Einstein - thought they were (sic) dropping the investigation against the McCanns because of their "innocence"?
"There will never be a trial" Yeah right.
Sad loser.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jomk2



Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 278

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:22 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

I thnk it will pan out that McVey's political ambitions died the day she jumped on the McCann bandwagon. Her judgement is now in question and West Wirral will be seeking a new candidate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pear



Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 3035

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Esther McVey's resignation Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="catinthehat"][quote="terrybull"][quote="redsquare"]Yes, I know this has been touched on in other threads but I believe it deserves its own thread.

We need to know why she resigned. .[/quote]

++++++++++++++++++++++

No, redsquare, I *don't* need to know why she resigned.

I think you're confusing me with someone who gives a damn.[/quote]

I don't think so - I don't think ANYONE - outside of your ego thinks you "give a damn".
Most of us realise that in fact - you DON'T give a damn about any of this - certainly NOT about the missing child. You never have - never will. What's important to YOU is being "right" - and even that luxury is going to be denied you - they will be questioned and CHARGED - both which you "swore" was NEVER going to happen - shows how much YOU know eh smart guy?
Hay Einstein - thought they were (sic) dropping the investigation against the McCanns because of their "innocence"?
"There will never be a trial" Yeah right.
Sad loser.....[/quote]

Being right? Not even that! Just feeling intelligent by writing a smartass post on as many threads as possible, regardless of the content Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goldfinch



Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 830

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:33 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

[quote="JTennison"]Interesting to hear that Ms McVeigh - not only has she experience of the political world, the Broadcasting world, runs her own PR Agency, but she's a trained Lawyer to boot - according to her No 1 fan Tigger who shouldn't ever think about a job in PR because she's just plainly detailed how Esther can never be described as somebody who would be easily duped.

T[/quote]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Considering she runs her own PR agency, wouldn't it be good PR for the McCanns if Ms McVey spoke publicy about her reasons for leaving and to wish them luck in their search etc.......
I'd be more inclined to believe the reasons for her departure if I heard it from the horses mouth so to speak ,rather than Comical Clarries
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Katherine



Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 844

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:37 pm    Post subject: Report this post Reply with quote

so far I have read:
- MBA
- Political career
- Pressure of work - but very amicable (Clarrie in the Star)

I expect that very soon we will be reading that she wants to spend more time with her family Very Happy Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> The hunt for Maddy All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 12, 13, 14  Next
Page 13 of 14

First  Previous  2-6 of 6  Next  Last 
Return to Esther McVey