MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Madeleine McCannContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME  
  LATEST NEWS  
  PJ FINAL REPORT  
  Member Messages  
  ►►SITE MENU◄◄  
  ►► MESSAGES �?/A>  
  All Messages  
  General  
  Messages For Maddie  
  Madeleine  
  Off Topic  
  Breaking News  
  Pet Memorials  
  MEMBER WELCOME  
  MEET THE MANAGER  
  ►►SUMMARIES◄◄  
  ►►�?MEDIA ◄◄�?/A>  
  NEWSPAPERS  
  Telegraph  
  Newspaper Thread  
  MAY Reports  
  JUNE Reports  
  SUN BOARD  
  TIMES BOARD  
  Daily Mail  
  MIRROR BOARD  
  GUARDIAN BOARD  
  Deleted EXPRESS  
  News Archives  
  News Articles  
  TV Program Links  
  Transcripts  
  TV News  
  Video Links  
  JOURNALISM  
  News Sniffer  
  ►INVESTIGATION�?/A>  
  Interviews  
  Suspicious  
  Re-enactment  
  Subliminal & Propaganda  
  Contrived Abduction  
  Facts  
  'Evidence'  
  Libel Threats  
  Lies  
  Quotes  
  Theories  
  Forged Photos?  
  McCann Travels  
  Timelines  
  FUND INFO  
  Fund  
  FUND INCOME / EXPENSES  
  Fund Compilation  
  FUNDRAISING  
  Fund 'Sources'  
  ►►►PEOPLE◄◄�?/A>  
  Kate McCann  
  Key People  
  Clarence Mitchel  
  Government  
  Brian Kennedy  
  Jon Corner  
  Metodo 3  
  Photofit  
  People MISC  
  Witnesses  
  Family  
  Unknown People  
  Esther McVey  
  Pol. Judiciaria  
  Tapas 7  
  Backers  
  ►►►► INFO◄◄�?/A>  
  Weather  
  The Law  
  Beachy  
  thentherewere4  
  Beachy Posts  
  AMBER ALERT  
  Information  
  M & E Children  
  Statistics  
  HUMAN BEHAVIOUR  
  Body Language  
  ►► CHAT ROOM�?/A>  
  Chat User Guide  
  ►► OPINIONS◄◄  
  Coldwater  
  HiDeHo  
  Jon Gaunt  
  Comments to Note  
  Gerry's Blog  
  Personal Attack  
  Misc Blogs  
  bb2002  
  Tabs poem  
  ►►WEBSITES◄◄  
  mccannfiles.com  
  Website Links  
  ►►PICTURES◄◄  
  Pictures  
  Manager Graphics  
  Pics fo Posting  
  Photo Curiosity  
  Backgrounds  
  ►►FORUMS◄◄  
  Digital Spy  
  Websleuths  
  THE 3 ARGUIDOS  
  3A Thread Lists  
  3A at Brussels Conference  
  3A Smiles  
  3A Ref. Threads  
  3A Distributions  
  3A Leaflets  
  MIRROR FORUM  
  M F Threads  
  Memorable Posts  
  Great Posts  
  Lost Pages  
  ►E-MAIL ADDYS�?/A>  
  ►►COMPUTER ◄◄  
  COMPUTER HELP  
  Computer Tips  
  HOW TO TIPS FOR 3A  
  3A How To Post  
  Avatars  
  ►►�?GAMES◄◄�?/A>  
  Brain Teasers  
  Time Wasters  
  Interesting Fact  
  Funnies  
  Points To Ponder  
  Nostalgia  
  Amateur Sleuth  
  For Skeptics  
  Estelle's Posts  
  Search  
  Priest  
  Remember Madeleine  
  Songs & Lyrics  
  'Source' Info  
  British Police  
  Sheree Dodds  
  PR & Spin  
  Trial  
  Your Web Page  
  3A Here To Stay  
  Documentaries  
  Diary  
  TEAM McCANN  
  Mgzne Interviews  
  TV INTERVIEWS  
  Robert Murat  
  Oprah  
  AMARAL'S BOOK  
  Fridge  
  McCanns History  
  McCann 'Defence'  
  Martin Brunt  
  Statements  
  Apologies  
  Investigate Fund  
  Statement Tables  
  MISC Web Pages  
  Millenium /Tapas  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Pol. Judiciaria : PJ - Following the trail
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 1 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzy  (Original Message)Sent: 2/6/2008 9:51 PM

Following the trail

How vital a role have the media played in Madeleine McCann's disappearance? And where does the investigation go from here?

Mark Williams-Thomas

 
May 31, 2007 8:30 AM |

It is over three weeks since Madeleine was abducted from the Mark Warner's Ocean Club, a resort in Praia da Luz. A description of a suspect that was given to the police on the evening of her disappearance was not circulated immediately, indeed it was not until 22 days after her abduction that the police made a direct appeal to the public. Why?

The Portuguese police are governed by a "Judicial Secrecy", law, which effectively prevents them from revealing anything about an investigation. This includes any identification of possible suspects, for fear of jeopardising a future trial. This precludes them from working with or using the media in any way to publicise appeals, or to ask for targeted intelligence - or does it?

I understand that the police can only work within their laws, even if they are draconian and seriously restrictive on an effective investigation. So why, 22 days after Madeleine's abduction is it alright to release information? I don't know the answer. What I do know is that in a community which is transient and international, an appeal three weeks after Madeleine was abducted is of little use. Could such a vague description really interfere with any criminal proceedings? Is it not true that such information was vital in the early hours of the investigation and should have been released then to the public via the world's media?

Interestingly, the description they have now released is of a white male, 35-40 years old, medium build, and 5ft 10in tall- I wonder how many people would fit this very vague description in the area.

The first few hours of any critical incident are, "golden", as this is when the trail is fresh and witnesses are around. The initial stages were vital, in order to assess the nature of Madeleine's disappearance. Was she abducted from her bedroom, which would require an offender to have gained entry to the apartment, or did she wander off?

Examination of the scene and speaking with the Gerry and Kate McCann would have answered many of these questions almost immediately. Questions such as; were the patio doors open or insecure? Were the shutters up or down? Did she take a teddy or comforter with her? Did she have shoes on? What did they tell Madeleine to do if she woke up and wanted them?

The ACPO Guidelines of dealing with missing persons, state that when the circumstances are suspicious or unexplained the incident should be treated as a serious crime. "It is always easier to rein back from the early stages of a major investigation than it is to recover missed opportunities resulting from miscalculating the early stages."

It was not until Friday that the police treated Madeleine's disappearance as an abduction. Were vital clues lost in the first few hours, because they failed to categorise the incident correctly? I would suggest that this is the case.

So how could the media have helped in the early days? In the recent Ipswich murders, the police had a clear media strategy and appointed a designated senior officer for the entire media liaison. In the Madeleine's abduction the media should have been utilised in exactly the same way to put out crucial public appeals immediately.

For example, when Madeleine was abducted she was wearing distinctive pyjamas, yet this information was not made public until four days after she had gone missing, by the parents. At the same time the media happened upon the police website which contained brief details about her disappearance. Once again I ask, if they were able to release information onto a website, which is in the public domain, then why were they not able to make a public appeal? Incredibly the Portuguese police still have not released an incident room number, to which the public can call and provide information.

So how have the Portuguese police worked with the world's media? I would suggest they are keeping them at a long arm's length and telling them very little. The first press briefing, which I attended, was forced upon the police by the Portuguese media. Although the police succumbed to this demand, in order to make a point they turned up three hours late and gave the briefing in Portuguese, much to the disgust of the 50 or so British journalists.

Further press briefings have provided little information about the course of the investigation to the media or indeed the family. The lack of information has unfortunately resulted in some of the media being generous with their reporting.

Of course the media should be a balanced. The moral panic of "naming and shaming", which followed the murder of Sarah Payne in 2000, was neither helpful nor constructive. While the last three weeks have seen the media pre-occupied with the Madeline McCann abduction, it is vital to get the balance right. Stranger abductions are extremely rare in the UK and stranger abductions where the child is killed have remained statistically static since about 1970, at between five and seven a year.

So where does the police investigation go from here? I know that the British police have been providing specialist help, for example with family liaison and specific intelligence of expatriates now living in the Algarve as well as offender profilers. I have my reservations about offender profiles as the motivation of an offender varies. In cases like this, there are three elements that are vital and motivation is for me the last and least important.

Firstly, access. How did the offender(s) gain access to the apartment? How did the offender(s) get away after the abduction? How did the offender(s) know about Madeleine?

Secondly opportunity. How did the offender(s) know that Madeleine would be alone in the apartment? How did the offender(s) know they would not walk into an apartment full of adults? And how did the offender(s) know they would have time to get away from the scene before the alarm was raised?

Thirdly, motivation. Why was Madeleine taken and not the other two children? And what was Madeleine taken for?

These are just some of the elements of access and opportunity which need to be focused upon before the motivation of the offender is considered. There are other contributing factors as well, such as formal and informal controls. Formal controls being, CCTV (of which there is none) and the police (one officer responsible for the area of Praia da Luz) and informal controls being the public (possibly many).

Given that the abduction of a three year old child is so rare, it cannot be expected that the Portuguese police have the necessary knowledge and skills to handle such an investigation. So they should ask for help, in the same way that a British police force would have an outside force conduct a review. Such a review is not about apportioning blame or criticising, but about pooling the expertise that exists around the world. To pull together every investigative technique, along with the minds of the best detectives to find out who has abducted Madeleine and where she is, before the trail goes too cold.



First  Previous  No Replies  Next  Last