MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
MrWonder's Bible Chat[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
    
  Home page  
  SEARCH SITE  
  Why Join?  
  Message Board  
  General  
  NLS Devotionals  
  Jesus Christ Claims To Be God  
  Pictures  
  Paradise/Hell 1  
  Paradise/Hell 2  
  Paradise/Hell 3  
  Spiritual Headship  
  Dynamic Atonement  
  Original Sin  
  Sabbath Answers  
  Sabbath Revisited  
  Chess Page  
  Chess Games  
  Chat  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : polar bears
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 7 in Discussion 
From: Dandelion  (Original Message)Sent: 1/12/2008 10:47 PM
Alaska > Governor > News > News Archive

<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Alaska</st1:State></st1:place> Submits Polar Bear Comments  <v:shape id=_x0000_i1027 style="WIDTH: 12pt; HEIGHT: 9.75pt" type="#_x0000_t75" href="http://www.gov.state.ak.us/print_news.php?id=275" o:button="t" alt="Print Now"> <v:imagedata src="file:///C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\msohtml1\01\clip_image004.gif" o:href="http://gov.state.ak.us/images/printer_icon.gif"></v:imagedata></v:shape> Printer Friendly

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 07-077 <o:p></o:p>

State of <st1:State w:st="on">Alaska</st1:State> Submits Polar Bear Comments to <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place> Fish & Wildlife<o:p></o:p>

Governor Palin Writes Letter to Secretary Kempthorne<o:p></o:p>

April 10, 2007, Juneau, Alaska �?Governor Sarah Palin wrote a second letter to Secretary Dirk Kempthorne opposing the listing of polar bears as “threatened,�?while the State of Alaska submitted comments on deadline, compiled into four reports, to U.S. Fish & Wildlife expressing the same concerns.<o:p></o:p>

The State’s opposition criticizes the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s analysis in four areas: 1) predictions of sea ice retreat related to climate change models; 2) existing regulatory mechanisms for conservation of polar bears; 3) criteria for listing, status, and trends of polar bears and their prey; and 4) unsubstantiated assumptions to support their petition and status assessment. The State’s formal comments to the Service were conveyed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game in a detailed letter accompanied by considerable corroborating evidence. <o:p></o:p>

Governor Palin wrote a second letter to Secretary Kempthorne to re-emphasize <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Alaska</st1:State></st1:place>’s opposition to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed listing of the polar bear as “threatened�?under the Endangered Species Act.<o:p></o:p>

“I am concerned that the determination made by the Service is based on incomplete information,�?Governor Palin said. “I want Secretary Kempthorne to have all the facts at his disposal before he makes a final decision. The consequences of listing the polar bear will have widespread social and economic impacts without providing any more protection for the bears.�?lt;o:p></o:p>

In a phone conversation with Secretary Kempthorne last December, Governor Palin discussed the possibility of launching a joint effort by federal, state, local, and Native governments to collaborate on research and planning for polar bear conservation throughout the circumpolar north. Both concluded such an effort will be important to address the polar bear challenge in a realistic, proactive, and productive fashion. Governor Palin offered Secretary Kempthorne her personal commitment to fully engage the State of <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Alaska</st1:State></st1:place> in this joint effort, and to work to ensure its success.<o:p></o:p>

“He assured me of his abiding commitment to work with the state to take actions to conserve polar bears, protect their habitat, and manage sustainable uses,�?Governor Palin said. �?lt;st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Alaska</st1:State></st1:place> is home to a healthy population of polar bears. We intend to keep it that way.�?lt;o:p></o:p>

What do you all think? Should polar bears be on the endanger list? I live in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Alaska</st1:State></st1:place> I have talked to a photographer that takes pictures of polar bears. He said that he sees polar bears with 2 to 3 cubs. That he sees at lease 45 bears each time he goes of to take their picture. But think for a moment. The snow melts up here every summer for a short time. The bears swim miles out in the ocean without drowning. Check the temperature it is too cold for melting. In fifty years it will still be to cold for melting. Remember in the eighty's they told us we would all die from acid rain. Well we are still here. I believe this is just another way to get into our pockets and for Al Gore to get rich by scaring people.<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>



First  Previous  2-7 of 7  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 7 in Discussion 
From: DandelionSent: 1/13/2008 4:17 PM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 07-077

State of Alaska Submits Polar Bear Comments to region Fish & Wildlife

Governor Palin Writes Letter to Secretary Kempthorne

April 10, 2007, Juneau, Alaska �?Governor Sarah Palin wrote a second letter to Secretary Dirk Kempthorne opposing the listing of polar bears as “threatened,�?while the State of Alaska submitted comments on deadline, compiled into four reports, to U.S. Fish & Wildlife expressing the same concerns.

The State’s opposition criticizes the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s analysis in four areas: 1) predictions of sea ice retreat related to climate change models; 2) existing regulatory mechanisms for conservation of polar bears; 3) criteria for listing, status, and trends of polar bears and their prey; and 4) unsubstantiated assumptions to support their petition and status assessment. The State’s formal comments to the Service were conveyed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game in a detailed letter accompanied by considerable corroborating evidence.

Governor Palin wrote a second letter to Secretary Kempthorne to re-emphasize Alaska’s opposition to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed listing of the polar bear as “threatened�?under the Endangered Species Act.

“I am concerned that the determination made by the Service is based on incomplete information,�?Governor Palin said. “I want Secretary Kempthorne to have all the facts at his disposal before he makes a final decision. The consequences of listing the polar bear will have widespread social and economic impacts without providing any more protection for the bears.�?/SPAN>

In a phone conversation with Secretary Kempthorne last December, Governor Palin discussed the possibility of launching a joint effort by federal, state, local, and Native governments to collaborate on research and planning for polar bear conservation throughout the circumpolar north. Both concluded such an effort will be important to address the polar bear challenge in a realistic, proactive, and productive fashion. Governor Palin offered Secretary Kempthorne her personal commitment to fully engage the State of Alaskain this joint effort, and to work to ensure its success.

“He assured me of his abiding commitment to work with the state to take actions to conserve polar bears, protect their habitat, and manage sustainable uses,�?Governor Palin said. �?Alaska is home to a healthy population of polar bears. We intend to keep it that way.�?/SPAN>

I notice how hard it was to read so I copied it to make this easier to read. This global warming scam has gotten out of control. As a Christian I pray that other Christians don't fall for this. Polar bears are fine. What do you all think? Should polar bears be on the endanger list? I live in  Alaska I have talked to a photographer that takes pictures of polar bears. He said that he sees polar bears with 2 to 3 cubs. That he sees at lease 45 bears each time he goes out to take their picture. But think for a moment. The snow melts up here every summer for a short time, maybe two months. The bears swim miles out in the ocean without drowning. Check the temperature it is too cold for melting. In fifty years it will still be to cold for melting. Remember in the eighty's they told us we would all die from acid rain. Well we are still here. I believe this is just another way to get into our pockets and for Al Gore to get rich by scaring people.

 


Reply
 Message 3 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname_MrWonder_Sent: 1/14/2008 10:13 PM
I don't know enough about this subject to answer coherently.
 
Has there been any kind of wildlife survey, such as capturing and tagging polar bears?  Do wildlife authorities have any estimate on their numbers?  Any idea of whether they are increasing or decreasing in number?  Any estimate on whether or not there is enough habitat and enough food to support greater numbers?

Reply
 Message 4 of 7 in Discussion 
From: DandelionSent: 1/27/2008 10:48 PM
 
Polar bears are great swimmers.

1. Polar bears are strong swimmers; they swim across bays or wide leads without hesitation. They can swim for several hours at a time over long distances. They've been tracked swimming continuously for 100 km (62 mi.) (Stirling, 1988).

2. A polar bear's front paws propel them through the water dog-paddle style. The hind feet and legs are held flat and are used as rudders.

3. A thick layer of blubber (fat), up to 11 cm (4.3 in.) thick, keeps the polar bear warm while swimming in cold water (Stirling, 1988).

4. Polar bears can obtain a swimming speed of 10 kph (6.2 mph) (Stirling, 1988).

5. The hair of a polar bear easily shakes free of water and any ice that may form after swimming.

6. A polar bear's nostrils close when under water.

 
It is not cold enough to melt in the winter. Yes, it warms up enough to melt in the summer. The glaciers everywhere has been melting for thousands of years. Did you know there is a glacier in Africa?
section of the Arctic Meteorology and Climate Atlas.

temperature vs radiation


Reply
 Message 5 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname_MrWonder_Sent: 1/28/2008 1:07 PM
Those bears are tough, aren't they? 

Reply
 Message 6 of 7 in Discussion 
From: DandelionSent: 1/29/2008 5:02 PM
Mr. Wonder,
Yes, they are tough. I just don't want Christians to be fooled into giving money to a cause that doesn't need money.  We need to be informed about this crazy idea of global warming. It is a fake. Just think in the 80s they said in 20 years we would all be dead from acid rain. We are still here. Plus God is in control. He will allow and hinder us from destroying this planet (which I know we are not destroying). God made this planet to clean itself. Whether by insects, animals, plants or weather this planet is made very good. God has the perfect design when He made this planet, with Him in charge.
 
Dandelion

Reply
 Message 7 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname_MrWonder_Sent: 1/30/2008 1:44 PM
And in the 70's the scientists swore we were entering a new Ice Age.  Now here we are in global warming.
 
I don't believe them either.  The earth is warmer because God said so.  The polar ice caps on Mars are melting too, and there's no men there causing it to happen.

First  Previous  2-7 of 7  Next  Last 
Return to General