MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
withfairnessandjusticeforallContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  ~WELCOME~  
  JOIN BACK UP  
  Take Care of This First - Now -Today!  
  *DISCUSSIONS*  
  
  General  
  
  Groups A - I  
  
  Groups J - R  
  
  Groups S - Z  
  
  BonaFidePolitics  
  F&J RADIO  
  *OFFICIAL LINKS*  
  GRAPHICS  
  F&J COPYRIGHT  
  No Trackers  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : new tidbit inre jfk assassination
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametrickoftheflame4  (Original Message)Sent: 10/13/2008 3:38 PM
 
i watched an interesting piece on saturday, called secrets of jfks admin revealed, and amid it this revelation emerged.  seems the injury to the presidents back was more severe than many ever knew, he received massive does of procaine at his triggerpoints and so many oral steroids that his colestrol levels were over 400.
 
i found it very sad that his doctor appeared to be killing him, most times it didnt relieve his constant pain.  i digress however, the bombshell is that jfk didnt have to die, the truth is that on that day in dallas he was wearing a stiff full back brace, and it is that brace that prevented him from falling forward after being hit by the first shot, this of course resulted in him remaining upright allowing the headshot to kill him, only then did he fall sideways and still not forward.  truth historically is so bizarre, to think that  a back brace is what stood between live and death is boggling.  jerry


First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSTX49©Sent: 10/13/2008 7:03 PM
Be sure to notify the others that originated their own conspiracy theories so they can add your's to the list.

Reply
 Message 3 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametrickoftheflame4Sent: 10/13/2008 7:07 PM
i dont see this as a conspiracy theory i do however see it as providing some solid answers concerning the whys and why nots of what happened that day.;  jerry

Reply
 Message 4 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametrickoftheflame4Sent: 10/13/2008 7:18 PM
by the way im sorry i failed to mention that the info provided by the history channel came from then jfk admin officials, even ted kennedy spoke on the program.  jerry

First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Return to General