MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
A Lot Of Crazy Friends[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Welcome  
  READ THIS FIRST  
  Message Boards  
  Members Mailboxes  
  Art Gallery  
  Creative writing  
  Gardening  
  General  
  Laughing Stock  
  â™«Piemans Place�?/A>  
  Photography  
  Poetry  
  Speakers Corner  
  Techy Stuff & PC  
  Wildlife  
  Currency Converter  
  World Times  
  Friends R Us  
  Pictures  
  Book Review  
  Film Review  
  Games People Play  
  Music/Concert Review  
  Members Birthdays  
  Banner Exchange  
  Links  
  How do I ??  
  Reflection Room  
  Documents  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Wildlife : A Dilemma
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOcker�?  (Original Message)Sent: 5/17/2003 12:09 PM
As a countryman I have always tried to strike a balance between nature and my own needs. Sometimes we can work in harmony, other times my needs overcome that of other creatures. Foxes for instance.
I keep poultry and as a result me and foxes are at daggers drawn over who should enjoy my fowl. I know the fox needs to eat but my fowl have rights too and being eaten by Reynard is not one of them. I am anti fox hunting for many reasons but perversely would not support a ban on it. Hunts are one of the main contributors to countryside conservation. I may not agree with hunting but I respect the wishes of those who choose to do so.
Now back to foxes, I will shoot any fox on my land, no question, and no second thoughts or regrets. I have had a large flock of rare ornamental breeds of duck decimated in one night by a fox, so yes i am biased ! The other night I was driving through a very small village when I came across 6 fox cubs, very young about the size of a kitten. They were playing on the grass verge and in the road. Stopping the car I watched them for a few moments. Two of them were mesmerized by the car headlights and I got out expecting them to flee. Strangely enough they didn't but proceeded to examine my boots and legs, no doubt lots of doggy smells !
No vixen or dog fox seemed present and certainly no warning bark was given, so I assume these were orphan cubs. I did debate taking one home but common sense prevailed, and I decided against. Now my dilemma .
Should I return home, about a mile , get my gun and dispatch these vermin ? Or let them take their chance ? If they were orphans a pretty slim chance unless they caught some mice or voles. If they lived they may well be predators of the future after my hens and ducks, on the other hand they did look so dammed cute.
Sentimentality won out and I left them to play and take their chance in life, but I did warn them if they ever did venture on my land then no second chance would be given. I drove home thinking I had done my good deed for the day, time will tell .


First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 2 of 8 in Discussion 
Sent: 5/18/2003 1:47 PM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 3 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOcker�?Sent: 5/21/2003 12:10 PM
Thanks for the pic Mad Max, the cubs I saw were half this size, very young. A foot note or paw note to my tale and indeed to your comment, the next day one of the cubs was dead on the road, hit by a car, not mine.
I hope the others make it but in true farmer speak 'KEEP ORFF MY LAND ' !

Reply
 Message 4 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameJìbbsSent: 5/21/2003 7:44 PM
oh that's such a sad story. Poor ickle cubs  Trouble is, I can sympathise with your dilemma Ocker. I too live in the country, up a track from a forest and common, so I get to see foxes and deer and muntjac <chinese deer> and rabbits etc. I am a soppy sentimentalist, and hate the idea of killing anything...unless...it kills something I'm fond of. I have never had chickens but I did rear a clutch of guinea fowl and I know I would have been very upset had I found them dead or maimed. hmmm six little foxes I may well have been tempted to leave, but one, or possibly two I think I would have taken them to some sort of animal rescue.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 5 of 8 in Discussion 
Sent: 9/10/2003 8:20 PM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 6 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOcker�?Sent: 9/17/2003 9:23 PM
Well I don't think it's a woman thing Spacey, a love of all God's creatures is fine and noble. However I have to disagrre with you on your comment that 'no wildlife is vermin', rats, mink, mice, foxes, rabbits, pigeons........and many others are vermin. OK some are cutesy to look at but they are still vermin.
 
Now as to a proper chicken house, yes of course I have one, ditto my ducks. However surely my poultry have the right to free range during the day time ? it's an urban myth that foxes etc. only hunt at night . I could of course enclose my birds in a confined space with little or no scratching areas or access to dust baths or pond. I prefer to give my birds a modicum of freedom and as they provide me with eggs ans occassionaly meat it's a fair contract.
 
The fox gives me nothing. To some he provides sport but that's another issue. As to sheep kills by dogs via foxes or rather lamb kills, foxes don't kill sheep, dogs kill both, I know in Ireland the incidence of fox's taking lambs is serious enough for the I F U (Irish Farmers Union ) to pay a bounty of £10.00 a tail for evey fox shot. ( or whatever that is in Euros now ). The bounty is paid for by sheep farmers and I can assure you they don't put money into anything that does not give them a return on investment.
 
I find foxes attractive creatures and admire their cunning, but if they come on my land I shoot them without a second thought, and I sleep easy at night.
 
So we must agree to disagree, but it's nice to debate differing views.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 7 of 8 in Discussion 
Sent: 9/19/2003 11:59 AM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 8 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameOcker�?Sent: 9/22/2003 1:14 AM
Pats Spaceys head, sorry if that sounded patronising, don't worry your pretty little head about it my dear . LOL
 
OK that should piss of the feminists as well as you or are you both, so better point out I was joking.
 
Very interested in your comments on rabbits in Glosc, ditto game birds, now at the risk of hair splitting , or should that be hair splitting *groans*, whilst I live in Oxon, my post code is Glosc. I travel a lot in Glosc. work wise. The incidence of rabbits on the verges at night means either your friends efforts are paying off or the little beggars were more resilient than first thought. The smaller game birds are sadly like many other birds in decline but pheasants are plentiful.
 
Our village has loads of em, we even have one that sits on our fence and demands to be fed when we feed the ducks and chickens. We call him Donald ( Donald Pheasants, film buffs wil se the joke) and whilst still a wild bird he comes to us every evening for an easy meal. Now as to your point about killing for killings sake, I really don't. My original posting was exactly about this. I will kill to protect those creatures that provide me with food, and assist me in keeping down slugs and snails etc. without the need for chemicals. However I won't go out and shoot anything just because it is there or for target practice, and to me that is the essential difference.
 
As to wandering away from the sublect that is one of the joys of this medium *smiles* hey we may even find we agree on some points.

First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Return to Wildlife