B.) Does it have potentiol for growth as is.
The way I see it yes and no. Yes, being how they are bringing in people from the past, and trying to give some of them second chances. No, because They are not well produced. Look at them, they are trying to hard to fit them in, when RAW and Smackdown are cleaning their clock. The only thing is, if your going to have ECW, keep it as the old ECW.
2.) ECW of Old V.S. ECW Of New, which is/was the better product.
The old ECW by far. None of this regular match shit!! It is either hardcore wrestling, or its nothing at all. ECW was based to be hardcore, and nothing else. Extreme rules all the way from what I remember it. But now it is shot down to WWE standards and it is nothing like it used to be.
3.) What should be done differently with the current ECW OR if you don't feel anything should be done differently, why is the current way the right way?-
I feel it needs to go back to where Hardcore should be. Not some oh your gonna get DQ'd if you hit some poor fucker with a chair. This is ECW not WWE. This is where rules are thrown out the fuckin window. These wrestlers like Sabu and Sandman, gave it their all, and they are hardcore. You can see it when they wrestle now, they are not into wrestling as much even though wrestling is still a part of the show.
Now thats my piece i know you can disagree and thats fine, but this is what i am seeing as of late