MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Results on a "brownie" study I did.
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameJamieDH4  (Original Message)Sent: 7/8/2007 7:26 AM
I did a study on brownies. The purpose of the study is to see which batch would last the longest with no sign of staleness.

Methods: 4 different brownies were made, using canola oil(CAO), palm oil (PO), butter (B), and coconut oil (CO).

Results:
At first, the CAO, PO, and B brownies were all smooth, and rich. People noted that the PO and B Brownies were much better tasting, versus the CAO or CO brownies. People generally did not like the taste or texture of the CO brownies. They tended to think that they were "hard", and there wasn't very much creamy-ness.
After a few days the CAO brownies began developing mold, and were no longer edible. The B and PO brownies were still both rich and tasty at this point, with a trend towards a harder exterior.
After a few more days, the B and PO brownies were getting harder, but still edible.
The coconut brownies were technically edible but most people didn't like the texture difference. They noted that it was very "solid". The coconut oil brownies were the same throughout the study. They were as edible on day 1 as they were on day 10, with no mold, and little noticeable increase in stiffness of the exterior.


First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 7/8/2007 10:08 PM
This sounds about right. If you decide to do this again, you might want to try making a simple shortbread. I used coconut to make a shortbread, and it tasted very good. You just mix sugar, flour, and the fat source, with a little salt. You can add vanilla extract if you like. You mash everything together until you see a lot of small "balls," then pound it down. I don't even use a mixing bowl, since it is so rich in fat that you don't need to grease the pan. I bake it at 340 degrees for less than half an hour.

Reply
 Message 3 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameJamieDH4Sent: 7/16/2007 5:45 AM
Why would the coconut oil one not develop mold?

Reply
 Message 4 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 7/16/2007 10:17 PM
I think it would eventually. There are several possibilities. Enig and others have said that the particular fatty acids in coconut oil have "antimicrobial properties," meaning that the "bugs" can't live very well. Also, with such a saturated fat, there is little lipid peroxidation. Here are some things you might want to take a look at:

http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/abstract.cgi/jafcau/1994/42/i08/f-pdf/f_jf00044a006.pdf?sessid=6006l3

http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=3423336

First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Return to General