MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Lithium Orotate vs Lithium Carbonate
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameJamieDH4  (Original Message)Sent: 7/29/2007 11:33 PM
Hans-

I was thinking of taking Lithium Orotate to help improve my mood. I did a search for 'lithium orotate' and all of the "credible" websites, such as John's Hopkins. all say that Lithium Orotate has not been proven to be effective like lithium carbonate and lithium citrate are.
I was wondering.... why would they think that? Is the difference in between them that different? Lithium is still the active ingredient, so I don't seem why thy think it would not work. I have searched and searched for a REASON as to why they think it won't work and all I find are declarations that it hasn't been studied. Does the ion that its attached to really make that much of a difference? I see them recommending calcium carbonate and calcium citrate as if though they are interchangeable, so what is wrong with lithium orotate?


First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 7/30/2007 5:53 AM
I don't see how the carbonate form could have better absorption than the citrate form, but I've only seen the orotate form being sold as a supplement, so that is why I've mentioned that in the past. Keep in mind that I would open the capsule and take a tiny amount, so that it might take a week to consume the contents of the lowest dosage capsule being sold to the public. The idea is that a little bit over the course of a couple of weeks or so might help, and if not, how could it do any harm? Again, my reading of the evidence leads me to believe that once you get the AA out of your cells and normalize you biochemistry, then you don't need this kind of supplement, though as I said, a very small amount now and then seems to be a worthwhile thing to try, though at this point I just take a little nutritional yeast with my meals rather than supplementing with things like lithium. I would suggest you make sure you are getting enough magnesium, especially in the citrate form - that seems to be more important, in general.