MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Immune system issues, beyond "AIDS."
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 1 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  (Original Message)Sent: 8/7/2007 10:34 PM
I've posted a lot of interesting material on the "HIV/AIDS" debate thread, but I decided to start a new post with material that may be relevant to "HIV/AIDS," but appears to have broader implications. Since my examination of the evidence has led me to think that "HIV/AIDS" would be thought of better as premature aging of the immune system, there is no real difference as far as the molecular-level mechanisms involved. Here is a new report that illustrates my point:

QUOTE: Scientists have discovered that at the same time the immune system is vigorously attacking invading viruses or bacteria, it is unexpectedly reducing its production of a particular type of factor that directs the movement of immune cells.

The new finding, which could help explain the transient immune suppression often seen during acute infections, shows that the immune system is even more complex than previously believed...

The findings could help scientists devise better dosing schedules for multi-dose vaccines and also could provide a better understanding of how the immune system responds to multiple infections. A likely result is a lowering of the body's ability to respond to a second infection.

"If you have an acute viral infection, your immune system may be suppressed in its ability to respond to secondary infections during that brief period," Dr. Mueller says. "If you have a nasty flu infection in the lung, for example, you are more susceptible to secondary bacterial infections, and this chemokine reduction could contribute to that..."

"The discovery of this basic phenomenon - that these lymphoid chemokines are reduced during an immune response - was quite a shock to us. It illustrates another dramatic level of complexity in the immune system and demonstrates in greater detail how the traffic of immune cells is regulated."

Dr. Mueller believes the down-regulation of lymphoid chemokines, which occurs for a one- to two-week period during the height of an immune response, may be the body's way of shutting down the immune response and avoiding excessive and damaging inflammation. In addition, reducing these immune factor could be beneficial for the immune cells that are actively responding to a virus, he points out.

IIn a massive inflammatory response to infection, many immune cells divide into great numbers of cells, Dr. Mueller explains. Once the immune response is complete, 95 percent of those cells die and leave a smaller population of memory cells to circulate in the body and protect against subsequent infections by that same pathogen... UNQUOTE.

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/08/070802182038.htm

Thus, these researchers have discovered an "AIDS," that is, if you are subjecting yourself to constant viral infections, you may develop an immune system disorder which is literally an acquired immune deficiency problem. I think it's highly likely that this is the problem that really killed many gay men in the early 1980s in New York City and San Francisco, for example. The fact that they were the first generationn of young adults, most of whom had arachidonic acid in their cells, is probably very important as well, but I've explained this on other threads.


First  Previous  No Replies  Next  Last