MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Cholesterol
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameViveUtVivas  (Original Message)Sent: 8/9/2007 10:34 AM
What is oxidized cholesterol?

Doesn't "fresh" cholesterol oxidize after ingestion or during digestion?

What parameters are required to cause fresh cholesterol to oxidize?

Can "free radicals" in the human body react with unoxidized cholesterol creating foreign or disease causing substances?



First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 8/9/2007 10:41 PM
Actually, cholesterol seems to be quite resistant to oxidation, for example:

"...In the presence of the physiological concentration of cholesterol in phopholipid bilayers, the amount of hydroperoxides produced by ionizing radiation is dramatically reduced. The packing effect of cholesterol in phopholipid bilayers is well recognized, as well as its influence on the reduction of water concentration in the bilayer. The dramatic reduction of hydroperoxides concentration observed when irradiation is performed in the presence of cholesterol probably originates from a steric hindrance to the radical chain reaction through the unsaturated lipids due to the presence of cholesterol."

Source: Free Radic Biol Med. 1995 Oct;19(4):511-6.

The biggest problem seems to be oxidized LDL. LDL is a protein molecule that "holds" lipids - cholesterol and fatty acids. When LDL contains a lot of PUFAs, experiments have shown that it is much more susceptible to becoming damaged, which then leads to "coronary heart disease." I don't know if the evidence is so clear on oxysterols, which is what oxidized cholesterol molecules are called - you can do an internet search for oxysterols in food and see if there is something really on point. I found the following, which is problematic because they used rabbits, which are animals that don't naturally ingest cholesterol:

"...oxidation of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins was significantly greater in rabbits fed oxidized cholesterol compared to the pure cholesterol-fed animals. The oxidized cholesterol-fed animals also had a 64% increase in total aortic cholesterol, despite lower plasma cholesterol levels compared to the pure cholesterol control animals. Taken together these results suggest that dietary oxysterols may substantially increase the atherogenicity of lipoproteins."

Source: The Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 39, 1995-2004, October 1998.

If you read this study on the internet, at http://www.jlr.org/cgi/content/full/39/10/1995, you can go to the bottom of the page and read through the references. My guess is that if you follow a diet such as the one I do, there will be very little oxidized cholesterol in it.