MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Greenland Ice in Climate Change
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameThe_Great_Society  (Original Message)Sent: 7/11/2008 9:37 PM
The following is fodder for a debate between Edmund and I on climate change, from the publication "Science." Sometimes Edmund denies the earth is warming at all. When he can bring himself to admit it, he insists that warmer temperatures are good, not bad, and that loss of species, crop land, and so on are just little clouds with huge silver linings.


A Greener Greenland

Melting of the Greenland ice sheet is expected to cause much of the rise in sea level that will occur as global climate continues to warm, although it still is not clear how much of the ice sheet will disappear as air temperatures rise. One way to infer how vulnerable the ice sheet is to temperature variations is to determine how it was affected by climate change in the past. De Vernal and Hillaire-Marcel (p. 1622; see the Perspective by Steig and Wolfe) constructed a pollen record for southern Greenland for the past million years, from a marine sediment core just off the coast. Large changes in ice extent and vegetation accompanied changes in temperature, illustrating the susceptibility of the ice sheet to climate change, and providing a guide as to what to expect with future warming.


First  Previous  No Replies  Next  Last