MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Post "Global Warming" issues here.
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  (Original Message)Sent: 9/6/2008 7:41 PM
I created this thread to keep "global warming" posts from becoming too numerous on this site. This subject is basically one of judgment, because it cannot be invalidated by the scientific method. In such situations, I am one to err on the side of caution, but seeing how so few others seem think along the same lines, I've essentially "given up" on this. I think people will have to see the devastation their actions cause before there will be the "political will" necessary to stop environmental destruction that is irreversible or will take decades or centuries to reverse. However, I don't mind reading the opinions of those who have devoted a lot of time to this issue, and in general, I believe that flawed arguments only become more tenuous apologists are given "plenty of room to hang themselves" with their own words. Censorship only serves to attract a lot of people to "bad" arguments.


First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 9/6/2008 7:46 PM
The following are posts by "Edmund129" which I moved to this thread:

The Great Ozone Swindle:

http://thedeadhand.com/Journal/tabid/160/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/83/Ch-2--The-Great-OzoneHole-Hoax-Part-2-of-6-.aspx

It turns out that O2 has the exact same spectral absorption properties that O3 has in the UV spectrum. It is mostly O2 that is absorbing UV, not O3.

The Greens have “alerted�?all of us to the alarming possibility that we are destroying the Earth’s ozone layer and threatening all life on Earth.

It’s an interesting premise. Let’s examine this acorn more closely.

Ozone is an unstable molecule formed when free oxygen atoms are released in an oxygen-rich atmosphere. That fresh smell following a thunderstorm is the ozone created by the electric bolts we call lightning. O3 �?ozone �?is a molecule consisting of three oxygen atoms, unlike O2 �?oxygen �?which consists of two oxygen atoms. Free oxygen atoms cannot exist by themselves. They immediately combine to form O2, oxygen. When free atoms of oxygen are released in an oxygen atmosphere, one of two things happens: they either combine with each other to form more O2, or they combine with O2 to form O3 �?ozone. Because ozone is naturally unstable, over time it will decay, losing one of the oxygen atoms. The free oxygen atoms so formed combine with themselves to form O2.

Post # 2:


http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4492
The Arctic Ice Is Not Cooperating
By Bob Parks Saturday, August 16, 2008

Environmentalists have been warning us for months about big chucks of ice that were going to break off, raising the sea level worldwide, ocean temperatures would changes, storms would intensify, and we will all be dead before the release of An Inconvenient Truth II.

Just a few weeks ago, predictions of Arctic ice collapse were buzzing all over the internet. Some scientists were predicting that the “North Pole may be ice-free for first time this summer�? Others predicted that the entire “polar ice cap would disappear this summer�?

One problem: arctic ice doesn’t listen to environmentalists.

The Arctic melt season is nearly done for this year. The sun is now very low above the horizon and will set for the winter at the North Pole in five weeks. And none of these dire predictions have come to pass.

Data and models are only as good as the info inputted.

Anyone who feels morally free to scare little kids with pictures of drowning polar bears that weren’t, would have no problems basing their dire predictions on fudged data.

When the facts get in the way of truth, fear is the environmentalist weapon of choice.

Post # 3:

Judge blocks the construction of a coal fired power plant because he has been brainwashed by Global Warming propaganda:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/07/01/georgia-judge-blocks-a-coal-fired-globe-warming-power-plant/

This is yet another example of how Man Made Global Warming lying Propaganda is being used to drive the cost of energy through the roof and turn America into another 3rd world country.

Inspite of the fact that water vapor is 270 times the greenhouse gas that CO2 is based on having more spectral absoption bands and higher concentration, and is also 100 times the concentration in our atmosphere than what CO2 is. And if you look at Man made CO2 contribution it is even smaller as this pie chart shows. This pie chart shows all of the greenhouse gases in our atmosphere. Our atmosphere only contains 4% green house gases and water vapor is clearly the most domenant...

Reply
 Message 4 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 9/14/2008 7:30 PM
QUOTE: Contrary to 40 years of conventional wisdom, a new analysis published in the journal Nature suggests that old growth forests are usually "carbon sinks" - they continue to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and mitigate climate change for centuries... UNQUOTE.

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/09/080910133934.htm

Reply
 Message 5 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 9/30/2008 6:40 AM
Very interesting stuff:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/09/080922184922.htm

First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Return to General