MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Censorship on AME
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 6 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  in response to Message 5Sent: 2/6/2008 10:49 PM
An AME story of my own: I once asked for a moderator to intervene because one poster was not reponding to a simple and direct question I was posing to him. As a result, my posts were screened afterwards, resulting in a disruption to discussions on various threads (because the moderators there are often slow to review the messages). I created a post about this issue, asking a moderator to explain what their policy is, but that post never got posted, and so nobody who reads the information on that site will know what is actually occurring. It may seem to be a "minor" point, but this is a clear case of intellectual dishonesty as far as I'm concerned. If they want to review my messages, that is fine, but they should explain why, and make their policy clear. When I reject a post, which is very uncommon, I include a note explaining why, in detail (unless the post is spam, includes racial slurs, or something else that is obviously not acceptable).


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: Censorship on AME   MSN Nicknamegos2u  2/7/2008 3:28 PM