An AME story of my own: I once asked for a moderator to intervene because one poster was not reponding to a simple and direct question I was posing to him. As a result, my posts were screened afterwards, resulting in a disruption to discussions on various threads (because the moderators there are often slow to review the messages). I created a post about this issue, asking a moderator to explain what their policy is, but that post never got posted, and so nobody who reads the information on that site will know what is actually occurring. It may seem to be a "minor" point, but this is a clear case of intellectual dishonesty as far as I'm concerned. If they want to review my messages, that is fine, but they should explain why, and make their policy clear. When I reject a post, which is very uncommon, I include a note explaining why, in detail (unless the post is spam, includes racial slurs, or something else that is obviously not acceptable). |