MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : I would like to do my own experiments with mice
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 19 of 19 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametaka00381  in response to Message 18Sent: 2/25/2008 3:06 AM
One possibility to fund the "1940 EFAD rats" verification experiment:

http://www.opensourcescience.net/

OpenSourceScience offers grants to graduate and undergraduate university students, scientists, and scholars to encourage replication of experiments examined on this website. The awards are administered by OpenSourceScience. Up to eight awards of $1,000 to $5,000 will be granted each year. The awards are intended to fund the direct costs of conducting research and will vary according to the complexity and difficulty of the experiment. For example, we expect to award grants for the first experiment in the $1,000 to $2,000 range.

Applicants should submit a research proposal with a clear description of the methodology and planned analysis, including a description of how the experiment will interface with the OpenSourceScience website. Applicants should also include a budget and a schedule for completion. The best of these proposals will be anonymously published on OpenSourceScience and publicly reviewed by our editors and contributors.

Resumes and/or curriculum vitae should be supplied for the primary investigator and assistants. Student applicants should provide a letter of reference from at least one person who will be involved in supervising and helping with the research. The proposal should discuss additional plans for publication of the work on the Internet and/or in print.

Decisions will be made based on the quality of the proposal, its professionalism, and prospects for providing a useful contribution to the field. Grantees will be expected to provide a research report at the completion of the study and participate in a discussion of their results on the OpenSourceScience website.

Email attachments of plain text or Word documents are preferred. Please send all materials and inquiries to:

[email protected]