MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : New study on liver "inflammation."
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 3 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameAIDSMythRethinker  in response to Message 1Sent: 3/21/2008 2:10 AM
I think that I have read something interesting in this article : http://www.liversupport.com/wordpress/2008/03/sulfasalazine%e2%80%99s-potential-for-reversing-fibrosi/

QUOTE :
The Signals Responsible
A well-known protein that controls the activity of over 200 genes, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) emerged as the agent responsible for instructing cells to resist death. Mann explained that the activation of hepatic stellate cells into myofibroblasts was accompanied by an increase in their NF-κB activity. The presence of this protein is believed to be the primary reason why hepatic stellate cells are able to resist death, their demise of which could allow liver tissue to heal. The NF-κB activity is a key player in how much scarring a liver incurs. As hepatic stellate cells resist death, scar formation persists and the liver progresses towards cirrhosis.
UNQUOTE

And they say also that sulfasalazine could be very useful against cirrhosis.

And I have read that sulfasalazine inhibits the arachidonic acid metabolizing enzymes.

See for instance here : http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b2.pharmaceutical/b2.1.monographs/CPS-%20Monographs/CPS-%20(General%20Monographs-%20S)/SALAZOPYRIN.html

QUOTE :
On the lipoxygenase side of the arachidonic acid cascade, sulfasalazine has been shown to exert an inhibitory activity on several enzymes including 5-LO and LTC4 synthetase. In line with this effect sulfasalazine has been shown to inhibit the release of lipoxygenase product from inflammatory cells and tissue.

Taken together, these effects of sulfasalazine on arachidonic acid metabolizing enzymes would lead to a decrease in pro-inflammatory lipoxygenase products with a simultaneous increase in immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory prostaglandins, which may have a bearing on the clinical activity.
UNQUOTE

Therefore I think more and more that if we haven't arachidonic acid in the cells, it would be possible to cure hepatitis, for instance hepatitis C.

Any thought ?