One group of people that it seems one needs to be very wary of are the "public health experts." With all the promises unfulfilled and failures of the "HIV/AIDS experts" and "researchers," one would think that our "public health experts" would be concerned, and perhaps questions exactly why there is no "cure" yet. Instead, such people seem more interested in attacking those who would dare to question the scientific claims supposedly supporting the "HIV/AIDS" notion, which, of course, is exactly what is supposed to occur in science. There is a vicious, circular logic that appears to have gripped such "experts," and they seem totally unaware that they possess it. They tell us that nobody should question the "HIV/AIDS" notion because it might drive hords of people to do something that will somehow lead to their untimely deaths, yet if the "HIV/AIDS" notion is in fact wrong and worse, misleading, millions of people are being driven to their untimely deaths by doing things like taking toxic "medicines" and not changing their lifestyles.
Thus, the only possible explanation for their position is that if a small number of scientists make a claim, everyone should act as if it is some sort of religious dogma. We should all be like "good Catholics" and not question what our infallible Pope tells us. Of course, this is ludicrous, because scientists are making claims all the time, and these claims are often contradictory. What makes the claims presented by the Gallo and Montaigner teams so much more credible than any other scientist's claims? The answer is supposed to be found in the evidence they present, and not in their interpretations of the evidence, yet with "HIV/AIDS," the exact opposite is the case. We are not supposed to look at the evidence, unless, perhaps, we are going to agree with the "HIV/AIDS experts" regardless of what the evidence is. Again, this may be fine for some religions, perhaps one can regard it as something of an apotheosis in that context, but it is the nadir for science. |