That woman's story is evidence that "HIV/AIDS" cannot be accurate, but since they never supply a formal hypothesis, there is actually nothing that can be refuted!
Another interesting this is that they say she is controlling the virus. How do they know? It is just an assumption, which they believe in because in their minds "HIV/AIDS" has been "proven," even though there is still no hypothesis for it! Keep in mind that they did not take samples of her blood and look for the virus, because if they did, they would find nothing different than others, whether those others are "infected with HIV" or not. Those undergoing certain kinds of stress will likely have more cellular fragments, and other signs of this stress, but they'll never find the abundant "HIV" that would have to be present in those said to have "high viral loads" in any human being. The evidence suggest that the person would not be able to live if there were such high amounts of a retrovirus, because this is a sign of a huge amount of stress. It would be interesting to experiment on common lab animals to determine exactly how much real "retroviral" activity a mammal could survive. |
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Prev Message
