HSWC wrote: "the Holocaust has absolutely nothing to do with [HIV/AIDS]"
It's probably nitpicking, but I'd beg to differ. We've already condoned experimentation on unwilling non-white children, as at Auschwitz; there have been calls for the tattooing and/or quarantining of all HIV-positives; hundreds of HIV-positive black men are currently sitting in prison for the "crime" of having consensual sex with white women, and we've poisoned hundreds of thousands of homosexuals. In what way is this not a holocaust?
Hell, Hitler should have thought of this. If only he could have convinced all the Jews, homosexuals, immigrants, and non-whites in Germany that they all had some virus that was targeting them selectively, and which could only be stopped by ingesting poisons, not only would he have succeeded in exterminating the lot of them, but we'd probably remember him as a humanitarian rather than a monster.
Of course, I understand your original point, and for what it's worth, I agree with it for the most part. However, I would counter by saying that an accusation (even one that's true) almost always reveals more about the accuser than about the accused. In this light, you should consider that the orthodoxy's choice to bring the Holocaust into this is not coincidental, for they are in fact perpetrators of a modern-day holocaust, and are, as we speak, in denial of this fact. This makes them the ultimate holocaust deniers, for they deny the existence of an ongoing holocaust in which they are participants.
--- Gos
"Nobody here but us heretics..."