MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : How little scientists really know.
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 63 of 65 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametaka00381  in response to Message 62Sent: 10/24/2008 2:24 AM
Well said Hans, but the problem is perhaps that the ordinary people prefer the Hollywood movie way rather than the more complex explanation and approaches. It's easier for them to swallow a pill or have an expensive surgery and blaim the failure on genetics rather than give up their present lifestyle addicted to fast food, stress and different stimulants from the real Hollywood movies to hard drugs. The environment created by the civilization further encourages this. The "experts" are then presented by the massmedia as heroes with extraordinary intellectual powers...

Hopefully, thanks to your explanations such as "putting the gasoline with sugar or rocket fuel in the car tank", "hitting the nail with a hammer while smashing your hand" or this "Hollywood movie style maximum firepower solving all problems" at least some normal people can understand what this is all about. I wish you found the time to put all this in a book ...


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: How little scientists really know.   MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  11/2/2008 7:07 PM