There's actually a book that shows how the claims about "HIV" and "AIDS" changed over the years, from the tentative initial reports to possessing a sense of definitiveness, within the space of several years, despite no additional evidence of importance being published. I know I cited it somewhere. It was written by a woman who was a historian but then became a journalist. If I remember, I'll post back here with the citation. That one section about how "HIV/AIDS" reporting changed was certainly worth reading, in the context of this thread. |