MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : I would like to do my own experiments with mice
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 7 of 19 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  in response to Message 6Sent: 5/1/2007 3:51 AM
This is the problem with current "nutritional science."  If you consume an oil like rapeseed, which is rich in erucic acid, you are probably going to cause yourself major harm.  However, if you choose high quality olive oil and don't cook it or eat it in a rancid state, that is fine.  Low qualilty olive oil is pretty bad, though.  Even "red meat" is not specific enough, for various reasons, which is why it makes sense to feed animals the kinds of diets people actually eat, or what is being recommended by the "experts."  I prefer the latter, to show that there is a big problem with their advice.  If the animals get plenty of canola oil with fish oil supplementation, and no "red" or "processed" meat, then if they don't like as long as the coconut fed animals, all other things being equal, you have demonstrated clearly that their advice cannot be correct.  It is a direct, undeniable refutation.


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: I would like to do my own experiments with mice   MSN Nicknametaka00381  12/7/2007 9:08 AM