MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : "Fresh" coconut oil
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameJamieDH4  (Original Message)Sent: 8/31/2007 9:55 PM
Hans-

You continuously use the term "fresh coconut oil" when referring to coconut oil. Why? I thought studies on coconut oil showed little to no rancidity whatsoever after a period of 2+ years. So what does it matter whether or not it is "fresh"? Coconut oil also contains no cholesterol to oxidise so heating it to high temperatures is not likely to cause any problem, unless the food you are cooking in it contains PUFA's or cholesterol.


First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 9/1/2007 5:36 AM
It is about 8% UFAs, and I once had a batch that went "bad," though it was after a year. It should either taste like coconut or have no taste. If it has an acidic quality or weird taste or odor, it should not be used, except perhaps to lube up machinery, though I'm not even sure it would be good for that purpose.

Reply
 Message 3 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameJamieDH4Sent: 9/3/2007 7:07 PM
Hans-

I did the experiment you asked me to do in another thread, where I left Olive Oil out to sit to se how long before it went rancid.

What I did was placed about a tablespoon of Olive Oil, not newly purchased and already opened for 2+ months, in 2 different small bowls. One I placed in front of a window and the other on a countertop away from the sun and other sources of light. I did not cover either.
Before I started the experiment I dipped my finger into the Olive Oil and tasted it and found no evidence of any rancidity. It tasted nutty and flavourful. After leaving the oil out each day I would dab a Q-Tip into them and then to my tongue to see if I could detect and rancidity and smelled it as well.
The one left out in the sun began to go rancid after about 9 days. The one that was not exposed to any light, but just sitting on the counter took about 17 days.

Reply
 Message 4 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 9/3/2007 9:37 PM
That sounds about right. Some old master oil painters would leave their paintings out in the sun to "dry." Now here's the problem: if you have olive oil that is low-quality, or if it's old, there is no way to know what it's going to do in your gut. In other words, it might generate a lot of free radicals there.

Reply
 Message 5 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 9/5/2007 12:02 AM
And here's a new report that is relevant to this issue:

QUOTE: Fat in the stomach may cause vitamin C to promote, rather than prevent, the formation of certain cancer causing chemicals, reveals research published ahead of print in the journal Gut... UNQUOTE.

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070903204800.htm

Reply
 Message 6 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 9/5/2007 12:04 AM
And here's another passage from that report:

QUOTE: ...Without fat, vitamin C curbed the levels of two nitrosamines by a factor of between five and 1000. And it completely eliminated the production of the other two.

But when 10% fat was added, vitamin C actually boosted the production of nitrosamines between 8 and 140-fold. Fat remains in the proximal stomach for some time after a meal and also makes up a substantial amount of the cells lining the stomach, say the authors... UNQUOTE.

Note that the "fat" probably was highly unsaturated.

Reply
 Message 7 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameJamieDH4Sent: 9/5/2007 12:51 AM
Vitamin C in high doses can also act as an oxidising agent. So sayeth the Perth Group.

Reply
 Message 8 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 9/5/2007 9:38 PM
The key point is the context, and in this case, the evidence suggests that it's not "fat," but unsaturated fatty acids, especially polyunsaturated ones. It's too bad the researchers did not control for the saturation of the "fat" used.

First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Return to Nutrition