MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : AA supplementation
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 23 of 34 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametaka00381  in response to Message 22Sent: 5/5/2007 5:12 AM
I agree that intense exercise without proper regeneration is quite damaging to the overall health and longevity. However, humans have evolved to accommodate certain level of exercise so sedentary lifestyle with omega-6 PUFA diet is probably what's killing most people. Also, recently scientists compared the levels of oxidative damage in mole rats (20 years lifespan) versus mice (2 years lifespan) and found no differences. They concluded that rather the resistance to occasional bouts of intense stress may be what determines the species longevity. From that point of view low intensity high frequency/continuous exercise (e.g. gardening) may be the best strategy. Unfortunately some people like myself are confined to the chair and computer most time of the day or even several days in a row and then try to compensate by a vigorous workout in the gym. Combined with a poor climatic conditions/environment in a metropolitan city and some stupid countermeasures based on the "experts" recommendations like consuming omega-3 supplements is then a prescription for disaster.

As for bodybuilding I don't think AA catalyzes production of a scar tissue in muscles because scar tissue would not be functional but these people possess impressive power and physique. I would be really interested to see if weight training can deplete AA in the body (can AA or the omega-6 precursors be stored in adipose tissue?). The strategy in bodybuilding is to induce muscle "damage" by training followed by regeneration. The quicker the regeneration the sooner next training can begin and the faster the progress ... With the Mead acid in muscle cell membranes the regeneration would take longer though with less long-term damage side effects and this may be quite enough for natural levels of "exercise". The greatest deleterious side effects would be probably with omega-3 in the cell membranes. One thing which puzzles me is the mechanism how testosterone/anabolic androgens speed up the regeneration process. Young men with high testosterone levels or bodybuilders taking anabolic steroids can exercise with high frequency and regenerate not only muscles but also the connective tissue and cartilage incredibly fast. Could this be that testosterone affects the AA deposits in cells or is another mechanism at play?


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: AA supplementation   MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  5/6/2007 4:53 AM