MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : Can antiioxidant supplements function as a kind of pollution?
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 17 of 31 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameAIDSMythRethinker  in response to Message 15Sent: 8/31/2007 10:15 AM
I’m not really surprised with that study. With (for instance) only 500 milligrams of vitamin C every day, there could be only one result : no results ! And then they will say that vitamin C (and other vitamins) have no utility (here : against heart attacks) !

As far the vitamin C is concerned, it’s well known that that vitamin can have utility only with at least a few grams every day.

Another (very) recent study has extra opposite conclusions !

See : http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=252337

QUOTE :
Vitamin C, E can help prevent cardio-vascular diseases, finds LU

Asit Srivastava

Lucknow, August 22: Researchers at the Biochemistry department of Lucknow University (LU) have found that Vitamin C and E can help prevent heart attacks and other cardio-vascular diseases. The clinical trials have been proved successful and the research has also been published in various International journals.

The research was carried out by a three-member team, headed by Prof M K Mishra of the varsity’s Biochemistry department. Mishra said, “In our study we have found that Vitamin (C and E) can efficiently regulate the blood and oxygen supply to heart. These vitamins also act as clot busters, thereby making the heart to function normally.�?

He added, the study has been published in various international journals on health like Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (Canada), Bill Sardi Knowledge of Health (USA), Experimental and Clinical Cardiology (Europe), PUBMED USA (a service of the US National Library of Medicine).

The researchers term their study a boon for those who have already suffered heart attack.

The clinical trials were conducted on 65 heart patients. It showed that the vitamins considerably reduce potentially harmful free radicals formed inside the heart.

Prof Mishra explained: “Basically, when heart patients opt for angioplasty or ballooning to remove blockages in arteries, the patients become vulnerable to a burst of oxygen consumption. The heart experiences a sudden rise of oxygen supply, which in turn triggers formation of toxins. Ultimately, the toxins have an adverse effect on heart that may lead to heart attack. But, in our clinical trails we have observed that the post-heart attack patients if administered Vitamins C and E can be protected from the burst of oxygen.�?

Happy by their research study, LU researchers have worked extensively for over four years to get the breakthrough.

“We have taken up the study in 2002. Initially, we did not get the expected results. But, now as we are getting the desired results we are working to further improve our research work. The varsity is in continuous touch with renowned cardiologist of India and abroad,�?said one of the members of the research team
UNQUOTE


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: Can antiioxidant supplements function as a kind of pollution?   MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  9/1/2007 5:45 AM