MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : Cholesterol studies you have probably never hear of.
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 20 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  in response to Message 19Sent: 9/28/2007 4:01 AM
Here are two posts I wrote up on a thread I started on another newsgroup:

Compared to the "studies" you hear about in the mainstream media, this
one is excellent:

QUOTE: ...LDL vitamin E levels were highest in rabbits fed corn oil
with added cholesterol. The significant elevations in linoleic acid
[18:2(n-6)] in serum and LDL may partially explain the high
oxidizability of LDL in rabbits fed corn oil. LDL isolated from
animals fed corn oil, lard or milk fat had significantly greater
albumin transfer across cultured endothelial monolayers compared with
those of the low fat diet group. Their oxidative modification further
contributed to endothelial barrier dysfunction. Dietary cholesterol
supplementation to the corn oil diet decreased oxidizability of LDL
and partially protected the oxidized LDL-mediated endothelial cell
dysfunction as compared with the corn oil diet group... UNQUOTE.

They found that beef and chicken fat were best, but they did not test
any of the highly saturated fat sources, like butter or even better,
coconut oil. This is an on-point study because it focuses on LDL
oxidation, which begins the heart disease process. Rabbits are more
susceptible than people, but the underlying biochemical mechanisms
appear to be the same (and there is no alternative to it).

Source: J Nutr. 1995 Aug;125(8):2045-54.Click here to read

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView...

Moreover, this study is consistent with other molecular-level
evidence, for example:

"Cholesterol protects the phospholipid bilayer from oxidative damage."

Source: Free Radic Biol Med. 1995 Oct;19(4):511-6.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView...

Just keep in mind that you should not eat foods with a rancid taste,
and there is no reason to use high-heat cooking. Boiling eggs is a
much better idea than frying, for example. Cholesterol can be
oxidized before it gets to your mouth, but if you take precautions,
it's unlikely that this will be a problem for you.


Some studies find that highly polyunsaturated oils lower cholesterol,
or LDL levels, but if LDL is not oxidized, it's not a problem, and non-
oxidized cholesterol, as we've seen, is protective. However, in some
of these kinds of studies, the researchers find some disturbing
aspects to corn oil-rich diets, such as the following:

"...In contrast [to animals fed lard or palm kernel oil], animals fed
the CO [corn oil] diet exhibited a shift of more buoyant to denser LDL
particles..."

This is due to oxidative processes, though the authors do not talk
about them in the abstract.

Source: Arterioscler Thromb. 1993 Oct;13(10):1418-28.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView...

Now for those unwilling or unable to understand the evidence (such as
"Ron Peterson," apparently), you have my sympathies, though I do wish
you sould stop misleading others.