MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : What is the basis for all these “saturated fat�?causes this or that “disease�?st
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 30 of 37 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  in response to Message 29Sent: 2/15/2008 12:08 AM
Here's a relevant abstract, which contradicts "mainstream advice:"

J Nutr. 2003 Jan;133(1):78-83.

"The serum LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio is influenced more favorably by
exchanging saturated with unsaturated fat than by reducing saturated
fat in the diet of women."

Müller H, Lindman AS, Brantsaeter AL, Pedersen JI.
University College of Akershus, Bekkestua, Norway.

We compared the effects of a high fat diet [38.4% of energy (E%) from
fat; HSAFA diet, polyunsaturated/saturated fatty acid (P/S) ratio =
0.14], a low fat diet (19.7 E% from fat; LSAFA diet, P/S = 0.17), both
based on coconut oil, and a diet with a high content of mono- and
polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA; 38.2 E% from fat; HUFA diet, P/S =
1.9) on serum lipoproteins. The 25 women studied consumed each diet
for 3-wk periods in a crossover design. The two high fat diets were
identical except for the quality of the test fat. The LSAFA diet was
identical to the HSAFA diet except that half the fat was replaced by
carbohydrates. Serum total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and apoB
concentrations did not differ between the HSAFA and the LSAFA diet
periods. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and apoB were lower when
women consumed the HUFA diet than when they consumed the other two
diets. HDL cholesterol and apoA-I were 15 and 11%, respectively,
higher when women consumed the HSAFA diet than when they consumed the
LSAFA diet; HDL cholesterol and apoA-I were lower when women consumed
the HUFA diet than when they consumed the HSAFA diet, but not the
LSAFA diet. The LDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol and apoB/apoA-I ratios
were higher when women consumed the LSAFA diet than when they consumed
the HSAFA diet. The LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio was higher when women
consumed either the LSAFA or the HSAFA diet than when they consumed
the HUFA diet, whereas apoB/apoA-I was higher when women consumed the
LSAFA diet than when they consumed the HUFA diet. Triacylglycerol and
VLDL cholesterol were higher when women consumed the LSAFA diet than
when they consumed either the HSAFA or the HUFA diet. We conclude
that, to influence the LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio, changing the
proportions of dietary fatty acids may be more important than
restricting the percentage of total or saturated fat energy, at least
when derived mainly from lauric and myristic acids, both of which
increase HDL cholesterol.


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: What is the basis for all these “saturated fat�?causes this or that “disease�?st   MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  2/17/2008 10:30 PM