MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : Caffeine, Aspirin, Paleo Diet
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 17 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGalkonis  in response to Message 15Sent: 8/19/2008 10:23 PM
Ok, an update here coming up on 3 months taking the HCL supplements:
 
Up until January,as explained before, I was on an all meat/eggs/raw milk etc Primal Diet which made my bowel movements nice and regular, usually around the same time a day, and they were always nice and formed (compared to back a year ago when I was on the SAD when they were always loose and messy and resulted in painful over whiping). Come January/February when I started eating low PUFA in general intead of all raw (my raw diet was very low PUFA as well), adding back in some carbs like potatoes and sprouted bread it made my stools a little looser, required some whiping, though still little compared to the SAD days, and they were less regular.
 
Now, with the use of the HCL my stools are back to regular (though now they are less one larger chunk and now more lots of little "nuggets" or a single piece that is very obviously composed of the "nuggets" with some nugget companions. That isnt an issue, is it?) requiring little to no whiping and are more regular around the same time of day.
 
In addition, I believe I am obtaining more energy from my food. In the earlier days of low PUFA (before HCL) I had good energy but would sometimes have periods where I would get very tired for a little while and would need to take a short (10-15 min) nap and I would be fine. Now I dont ever get tired during the day and am more clear headed in general.
 
My rosacea, though, has not seemed to have gotten any better. I have been very low PUFA for a year now and it only seems to have gotten worse (though It hasnt really changed in the last 5 months or so). I am taking 2 pills (each pill contains 650mg Betain HCL and 162mg Pepsin.  Solaray brand) in the middle of each meal (I tried taking 3 and it usually made my chest burn after a little bit so I reduced it to 2), but over the three months I havent had to reduce the dosage to less than 2 pills (once in awhile my chest will burn slightly with the two pills, but its very rare, once ever several days, and I think thats because I didnt eat much food).
 
What do you think Hans? Should I continue taking 2 pills with each meal until it starts making my chest burn, or increase/decrease the dosage? Take something else? Is Pepsin useful? Do you remember how long you were low PUFA before your rosacea went away? Of course considering "doctors" dont know what causes rosacea, ours could have different points of origin.
Thanks!
 
-Drew


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: Caffeine, Aspirin, Paleo Diet   MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  8/20/2008 7:03 PM