Yesterday the psuedo psychologist posted an edited version of this case.  Of course he edited out key elements and went on to proclaim that this man was guilty because he impersonated this woman on the internet.  Some of you may have caught the exchange.  I asked the good fake doc if it would have been acceptable for this man to post her personal information using his real name.  After much evasion he finally said if there were no impersonation, there would be no crime.  There are a couple of things I find interesting in all of this.  First of all, where and why did he find this info:

 

 

Kind of a strange place to be hunting around.

 

Secondly, his either ignorance to the real issue or his inability to recognize and accept responsibility for his own behavior.

 

I post this as a warning to those unconvinced of this.  He is an unstable man not to be trusted.

 

Case 2. The defendant had become fixated upon the victim, who refused to engage in a romantic relationship with him. After several years, the defendant began to pose as the victim on the Internet. He placed several sexually graphic "want ads" on Internet bulletin boards and in this way began to correspond with men while posing as the victim. He then solicited the men to rape the victim, by claiming that he/she enjoyed rough sex and rape fantasies. As part of the solicitation, he provided the men with the victim's address, phone number, and other personal information. When the victim learned of these events from one of the men so solicited, she went to local police and was told there was nothing they could do. Eventually, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) referred her to STAT. After extensive investigation by STAT and the FBI, a felony stalking complaint was issued. The defendant eventually pled guilty and received a six-year sentence to state prison.