MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
ByLandSeaorAir_AllUniformsWelcome[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Welcome To Land, Sea or Air  
  25th Anniversary Falklands War  
  Disclaimer  
  OPSEC  
  Group Rules  
  Copyrights  
  Site Map  
  Going MIA?  
  Our Back Up Group  
  Meet the Managers  
  â™¥Side - Boy�?/A>  
  General Messages  
  Pictures  
  Photos from NZ 07  
  VOTE FOR US  
  Our Special Days - January  
  Our Days  
  In Memory of Cpl Mike Gallego  
  In Memory of Sgt. Nick Scott  
  In Memory  
  Pro Patria  
  All Military Pages  
  Our Heroes  
  Military/News Items  
  Remembering London 7/7  
  Remembering 9/11  
  Members Pages  
  Banner Exchange & Promoting  
  Our Sister Sites  
  Email Settings  
  Links  
  MSN Code of Conduct  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Canadian News : Deaf-mute man to stand trial, judge rules
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 1 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknameglitterbaby113  (Original Message)Sent: 7/5/2005 10:54 PM

A Nunavut judge has ruled that a deaf and mute man will stand trial, despite objections that it would violate the man's Charter rights because he can barely communicate.

Bobby Suwarak, 35, of Baker Lake in central Nunavut, was charged with sexual assault and break and enter in March, 2004.

Two months ago, a lawyer acting as a "Friend of the Court" applied for the charges to be stayed, arguing that Suwarak wasn't able to get the fair trial that is guaranteed under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Lawyer Tim Kavanaugh said he can't communicate with Suwarak, who can only communicate with a few people using a special system of signs and charades, and therefore can't represent him in court.

Kavanaugh also said the courts had done nothing in the past to provide a qualified legal interpreter to ensure Suwarak understood the legal proceedings. The lawyer said a man who acted in court as Suwarak's interpreter for past offences didn't fully understand the legal process and hadn't been properly trained.

But Justice Earl Johnson of the Nunavut Court of Justice dismissed that argument, saying that the legal system had tried to improve Suwarak's ability to understand others.

In a 18-page ruling, the judge said no one could have known that Suwarak would be back in the courts.

Johnson gave the court administration until September 2006 to complete a training program for both the accused and the people who will act as his interpreters during his trial.

Crown prosecutor John Solski said he was pleased with the ruling.

"This gives everyone an opportunity to be in a position where they have their day in court," Solski said.

Kavanaugh said the decision means that Suwarak won't face trial until the fall of 2006, at the earliest �?more than 2½ years after the charges were laid.

"Any delay...is going to raise the constitutional right to be tried within a reasonable time," Kavanaugh said.

He said he'll decide in the next few weeks whether he'll appeal the ruling.



First  Previous  No Replies  Next  Last