MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : FYI - Various
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameStuart189  (Original Message)Sent: 7/5/2007 5:44 PM

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cabi/bjn/1987/00000057/00000003/art00013<o:p></o:p>

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=442970<o:p></o:p>

Don’t know if either of these files would be of interest, but I have been wondering whether it might be at least partially as simple as what isn’t subject to anabolism ends up in the gut (with the comparative ratios of the present fatty acids determining metabolism). I’m just getting into this.<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

I have developed an Excel spreadsheet of the lipids/fatty acids content of the standard oils, but Yahoo’s system prevented me from sending it to you. Is there a way to get it through? I have asked the USDA to list properly clarified butter in its Nutrients Database. I think butter may have too high a standard error depending on whether the cows are grass fed or feed lot fed. I guess I should have mentioned that as well in my communication with the USDA. I didn’t bother to list the oils I would be unlikely to use like flax seed oil, but I could do it if there was interest. My goal was to get to see the lipids content of the major oils on one page. Is there a better database for oils that would link more properly to the above articles?<o:p></o:p>

Stuart//<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>



First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 7/5/2007 10:08 PM
From the first study you cite, this is interesting: "...By contrast the low oxidation rate of C,, fatty acids, like dihomo-y-linolenic acid and arachidonic acid, suggests that they share a common pathway, which could be quite different from that of the C,, poly-unsaturated fatty acids. In the few reports on the oxidation of arachidonic acid, it was found to have a very low..."

However, I'm not sure about why you cited these studies. If you mean obesity by "ends up in the gut," then I don't think that is what they are saying. Instead, they are saying that the AA is incorporated into cells, in phospholipids. In fat cells, the cell expands, but in all (or nearly all) cells there are phospholipids, and there needs to be one long-chain PUFA in the "sn-2 position." This is used to make medicine-like metabolites when certain stresses occur.

The other study is about dietary SFAs increasing LDL (or not), but that's not relevant if you don't have oxidized LDL, so it's not of much interest to me. It would seem important, however, to someone who does not realize that oxidation of LDL is the key, not SFA consumption.

As to the lipid chart, it's important not to get too caught up with these kinds of abstractions. This is one of my major criticisms of the nutritional establishment. Just because a fat source has a certain lipid profile does not mean it is "healthy" or "unhealthy." One example is "heart-healthy monounsaturates," which is what a lot of "experts" are babbling about these days (notice that they still have yet to explain why the "heart-healthy polyunsaturates" they used to recommend is no longer part of the mantra). High-quality olive oil is acceptable, if it is fresh and you don't cook with it. Low-quality olive oil should be avoided, as should canola and rapeseed oil. If you provide a chart, people can get confused. I prefer to get people to think for themselves, and judging from what I've seen up to this point, I think it's working fairly well. Rome wasn't built in a day, so it's important to have some patience, and just read through the material on this site, without getting distracted by specifics that are not especially important.