 |
Reply
| | From:  gos2u (Original Message) | Sent: 11/6/2007 7:41 PM |
Given that Rod probably will not post my resignation from his forum, I am reproducing it here, so that all can read it: Rod, OK -- that's it, I'm outta here. I will not participate in a censored forum. You do no service to the debate by censoring it, and you only serve to further discredit our movement, especially when you refuse to censor ad hominem attacks and paranoid accusations of being a "fake persuader". Are you working for the orthodoxy, or are you merely unwittingly doing your damnedest to make us all look like a bunch of tinfoil hats who bury our heads in the sand at the first sight of contrary "evidence", no matter how specious? --- Gos "Nobody here but us heretics..." |
|
 First
Previous
2-8 of 8
Next
Last
|
Reply
| |
| As I said in the other post, if posts are going to be deleted, it's important to make clear exactly why, either on a page dedicated to the "rules" of the group or in a commentary submitted with the rejection. When your posts were deleted/rejected, were you told why? |
|
Reply
| | | From: gos2u | Sent: 11/7/2007 2:06 AM |
No, I wasn't, and this isn't the first time my posts have been deleted at AME without explanation. --- Gos |
|
Reply
| |
| Well, if you want, why don't you submit them on this thread, so that people can see what the "big deal" was? |
|
Reply
| | | From: gos2u | Sent: 11/7/2007 4:32 AM |
I don't have copies of any of them, but I will be submitting my posts here in the future. Thanks for maintaining a scientific debate forum where actual debate is allowed to occur. --- Gos |
|
Reply
| |
| An AME story of my own: I once asked for a moderator to intervene because one poster was not reponding to a simple and direct question I was posing to him. As a result, my posts were screened afterwards, resulting in a disruption to discussions on various threads (because the moderators there are often slow to review the messages). I created a post about this issue, asking a moderator to explain what their policy is, but that post never got posted, and so nobody who reads the information on that site will know what is actually occurring. It may seem to be a "minor" point, but this is a clear case of intellectual dishonesty as far as I'm concerned. If they want to review my messages, that is fine, but they should explain why, and make their policy clear. When I reject a post, which is very uncommon, I include a note explaining why, in detail (unless the post is spam, includes racial slurs, or something else that is obviously not acceptable). |
|
Reply
| | | From: gos2u | Sent: 2/7/2008 3:28 PM |
Speaking of which -- I updated that BioLad debate a couple of weeks ago, and I'm about to update it again sometime soon (hopefully within the next week. It's getting pretty interesting... --- Gos "Nobody here but us heretics..." |
|
Reply
| |
| You have a lot more patience than I do, but then again, this individual refused to answer a basic question I had about "Hep C," namely, why actual "HCV" particles could not be found though an abundance of genetic material he claims must be from "HCV" can be found. I didn't see anything in his responses on your site that was noteworthy. Instead, he seems to assume what he is trying to demonstrate, which of course is meaningless - reminiscent of Medieval philosophical notions, actually. |
|
|
First
Previous
2-8 of 8
Next
Last
|
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Return to General