MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : Introductions: Dr. C here. Who are you?
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 4 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  in response to Message 3Sent: 11/27/2007 10:19 PM
If I hadn't "self-diagnosed," I'd be dead now, so I'll just add that you can apply the scientific method to your problem (doctors later confirmed by diagnoses). One thing to do is to eliminate possible causes and give it a few months. At this point, obviously, I don't have enough information to even guess at possible causes. For example, does any other "blood" relative have this condition, or a similar one? What is your diet like? Do you stress certain parts of your bodies in ways that are unusual? What about mineral/vitamin supplements? Etc.

As to gravity, I've seen some TV shows on string theory, but it seems like it should be called a string hypothesis, at best. I've found the biological fields much more interesting, because things like health and longevity are involved, and one can experiment on oneself. One thing you might want to explain here is why you conceive of gravity as more of a pushing force. Also, let's say there was an announcement tomorrow, and everything was resolved - a grand, unified field theory was discovered. It would supply details, of course, but we already know that everything does "work," and the only question is exactly how?

On the other hand, there are all kinds of contradictory health, medical, dietary, and biological claims (have you been to www.gilbertling.org). Moreover, it should be a lot easier to use the scientific method here than in string theory, and yet decades go by, and old, directly-refuted dogma persists. Thus, there are also social, political, economic, and psychological issues involved. Being trained as a "social scientist," I can't help but to find these things interesting as well.


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: Introductions: Dr. C here. Who are you?   MSN NicknameSpaceArterPhD007  11/29/2007 4:23 PM