MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : Grandparents
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameViveUtVivas  (Original Message)Sent: 7/29/2007 8:06 AM
Hans,

In several posts you mentioned your grandparents, their diet, and their longevity. (I wanted to post this as a reply to a pertinent thread, but I'm having a hard time navigating here, it seems there is no way to search the text of the messages.)

Could you elaborate on their habits:
1. What kind of environment did they live in (country/farm/city/suburb/etc.?)
1.5 What were their sleep habits like?
1.7 Did they do any exercise at all, were they sedentary? Did they walk or hike or spend time outdoors?
2. Did they eat breakfast (that is, a morning meal not too long after waking), and if so what and how much?
3. Did they eat three meals per day?
4. What were the major food items in general? In other words, were there some 2 or 3 food items that they depended on more than others, or that they ate with most meals.
5. Were they very disciplined or did they allow more flexibility in their habits and eating schedules?
6. Did they have access to sweet fruits, and other sweet foods? How much of them did they eat? In what context?
7. What was their dental health like? Did they keep their teeth to the end?

Please make any other points outside of these questions that are pertinent to health and nutrition.

Thanks and appreciation in advance for your answer.




First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 7/29/2007 9:48 PM
They were born in the 1880s, came to this country while in their teens, got married young. Social security for old people came into effect at just the right time for them, so they were able to retire and not worry about money. They kept themselves busy doing stuff around the house. My great grandfather enjoyed gardening especially. They did like to watch TV too - never did any "exercise." They used olive oil, but didn't cook as much as people do today. They liked fruit and cottage cheese especially. When they ate meat, it was always in small portions. They rarely ate fish, and never ate fatty fish. They would eat cookies, cake, pastry, etc., but again, only in small amounts at a time. I don't remember any dental issues or even health problems, until they got very old. He had a cancerous growth removed when he was about 90 or so, but it was on his head, and he was bald and would garden with no hat on in the sun. She slipped and fell in the bathroom at 96, and he died of pneumonia several months after his 100th birthday, when a bad flu was going around. They were generally calm people who had an easy life at that time (1970s/80s), and basically did the same thing every day. In the winter, he didn't garden, but other than that they lived a rather simple life - no smoking, a little red wine once in a while and in small amounts.