MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : The new religion known as nutritional advice.
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  (Original Message)Sent: 8/29/2006 1:11 AM
QUOTE: According to Saher, in most cases people’s everyday thinking and beliefs are in line with expert views, but sometimes they lead to an opposite conclusion from what scientific evidence would suggest. Such beliefs can seldom be shaken by rational arguments. It has been suggested that some of these beliefs come close to superstition. UNQUOTE.

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/08/060822102824.htm

If I had not decided to do my own research, focusing on the data generated by the experiments rather than anyone's opinion, it's unlikely I'd be writing this today.


First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 1/9/2007 9:24 PM
It's amazing how often reports of nutritional studies, such as the one below, contradict the dogma, and yet "nutritional experts" often talk with great authority, sometimes even acting indignant that anyone would question the dogma they spout:

STOCKHOLM, Sweden, Jan. 8 (UPI) -- Full-fat dairy products have a more slimming effect than low-fat foods, researchers at Stockholm's Karolinska Institute said.

The findings were based on interviews with nearly 20,000 women whose dietary habits were tracked since 1987, The Local newspaper said Monday. When the study began, the women had an average body mass index of 23.7. Ten years later, the women who consumed full-fat milk or cheese had a lower BMI than those who didn't.

Based on their findings, researchers said a glass of whole milk every day will result in 15 percent less weight gain. Full-fat cheese showed even better results: a portion a day yielded a 30 percent less weight gain.

"The surprising conclusion was that increased consumption of cheese meant that overweight women lost weight," said Alicja Wolk, a Karolinska Institute professor.

Copyright 2007 by United Press International. All Rights Reserved.

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20070108-17564400-bc-sweden-dairyproducts.xml