MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : Egg Yolks
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamecelineofca  (Original Message)Sent: 2/24/2008 10:04 PM
For Hans:

I appreciate this forum!! (I have found it from Bruce on Yahoo). I read many of what you write but not found if you think it is better to eat egg yolks raw to avoid oxidising the cholesterol and denaturing the proteins? Also are egg yolks too high in PUFAs and better to leave out anyway if you eat many of quality proteins from dairies?
Thank you.

(sorry for my english!)


First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrectSent: 2/25/2008 11:57 PM
Well, remember that oxidation requires oxygen, so boiling the eggs should be fine. Denaturing the proteins shouldn't be a problem, either, unless you have severe digestive issues. There's not a lot of any fat in eggs, so PUFAs aren't an issue, only the cholesterol is. You may even be able to make scrambled eggs without too much conern, but I'd avoid that until I see more evidence about oxidation and also the material used to make the pans people use.

Reply
 Message 3 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamerensielkSent: 2/26/2008 8:37 AM
Eggs have about 4.5g of fat, and anywhere from about 0.5g PUFA to 1.0g of PUFA. I always look for the ones with 0.5g PUFAs, which they are probably rounding up from 0.3g. The eggs with a gram of PUFAs are probably fed soy. The eggs with 0.5g or less are probably fed grains mainly.

I've heard that hard-boiled eggs are not as easy to digest as soft-boiled. Raw eggs are in-between, they digest faster than hard-boiled eggs, but slower than soft-boiled.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,754626,00.html

Here is a study showing that the protein in raw eggs is much less digestible than cooked eggs. There is also more wide variation in the degree of digestibility of raw eggs.

http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/128/10/1716

Also, there is not a scientific consensus that oxysterols are the cause of heart disease or any other disease, in humans. There might be a combination of factors required to cause the damage and faulty repair in heart disease.. Leib Krut has done studies and he argues that oxysterols are healthy, and prevent crystallization of cholesterol.

http://www.thincs.org/discuss.cordainagain.htm#Leib
http://www.thincs.org/discuss.atherosclerosis.htm#Leib2
http://www.thincs.org/discuss.atherosclerosis.htm#Leib3

Reply
 Message 4 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametaka00381Sent: 2/27/2008 1:39 AM
Eggs can be causing problems because people are immunized with vaccines grown in the eggs.

It is interesting to compare oxidized cholesterol to oxidized PUFAs. I have not seen any study showing that oxidized cholesterol attaches to and damages vital biomolecules like DNA and proteins while oxidized PUFAs do this readily!

Reply
 Message 5 of 5 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamerensielkSent: 3/1/2008 3:37 PM
Another thing to consider is that ovomucoid in raw egg white seems to be the cause of egg allergies.

http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2783719

There are also enzyme inhibitors in raw egg whites that may block protein digestion by about 40%, as shown by the study about raw and cooked egg protein digestion.

Here's an abstract about enzyme inhibitors in raw egg white. They block trypsin and chymotrypsin function.

http://www.springerlink.com/content/j64736t3p4644182/

First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Return to Nutrition