MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : AA supplementation
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 24 of 34 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  in response to Message 23Sent: 5/6/2007 4:53 AM
My great grandfather, the one who lived to be over 100, was strong but short.  His son, who is now 93, is a little taller, lives a sendentary lifestyle, and does eat his share of omega 6 PUFAs (but hardly anything in the way of omega 3s).  He had a pacemaker put in nearly 20 years ago, has had hypertension for decades, and now has pain in his back and legs that can be severe.  I saw the mole rat story - Ray Peat pointed out that this animal has less oxygen available to it, which is of course necessary for oxidative stress.  Do you have a citation for it, so that I can see if it is the same story that I read?  If you look at the top killer "diseases" for humans, "heart disease" and cancer, and then look at the molecular-level mechanisms, you see that it's all about oxidized LDL (for heart disease) along with AA metabolites, in the vast majority of cases.
 
As to the muscle build up, you might want to think along the lines of cell stressors.  If cells are stressed, and there is "fuel," as well as the "building blocks" for new tissue available, there should be no "disease" in the young and healthy.  Ray Peat said something about testosterone and/or androgen having the potential to be helpful in this context, if I remember correctly.  Did you look on his site to see if he has anything on this subject?  He has more of a hormone and tissue understanding, whereas I find the molecular and cellular level to be easier to understand and more basic, at least in certain ways.


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: AA supplementation   MSN Nicknametaka00381  5/7/2007 2:22 AM
     re: AA supplementation   MSN Nicknametaka00381  5/7/2007 2:40 AM