MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : Can antiioxidant supplements function as a kind of pollution?
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 1 of 31 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  (Original Message)Sent: 5/2/2007 4:07 AM
The following two reports appeared on the same day, and when you read a great deal of the evidence, as I do, you come to realize that these kinds of reports always depend on the context.  That is, to say something like, "antioxidants are very important and everyone should take them" is dangerous, due to its lack of specificity.  Without specificity, one can simply point to a "study" and claim that he or she is "right."  What is necessary is an understanding of the underlying mechanisms, and that seems to be something few people possess in the diet and health arena:
 
 
QUOTE:  Those phytochemicals -- natural plant-based compounds that give fruits and vegetables a reputation as healthy food -- could be unhealthy if consumed in high doses in dietary supplements, teas or other preparations, scientists in New Jersey have concluded after a review of studies on the topic.

In their article, scheduled for the current issue of ACS's Chemical Research in Toxicology, a monthly journal, Chung S. Yang and colleagues analyze available data on the toxic potential of polyphenols. That group of dietary phytochemicals includes flavonoids, whose suggested beneficial effects in fruits and vegetables include prevention of heart disease and cancer. The data was from studies done in humans and laboratory animals.

The report cites specific examples of toxic effects, including reports of liver, kidney, and intestinal toxicity related to consumption of high doses of green tea-based dietary supplements...  UNQUOTE.

SOURCE:  http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070430224756.htm

QUOTE:  According to a study in the May/June 2007 issue of the journal Ground Water, pharmaceuticals are being found in septic tanks and, consequentially, ground water due to incomplete human metabolism and excretion into the waste stream or by disposal of unused medications in the toilet or down the sink...  UNQUOTE.

SOURCE:  http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070430181148.htm

 

 



Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: Can antiioxidant supplements function as a kind of pollution?   MSN Nicknametaka00381  5/15/2007 4:46 AM
     re: Can antiioxidant supplements function as a kind of pollution?   MSN Nicknametaka00381  5/15/2007 4:57 AM
     re: Can antiioxidant supplements function as a kind of pollution?   MSN NicknameJamieDH4  9/3/2007 5:20 PM
     re: Can antiioxidant supplements function as a kind of pollution?   MSN Nicknametaka00381  10/18/2007 9:59 AM