|
|
 |
Reply
| | From:  Neddy™GT (Original Message) | Sent: 5/4/2008 2:52 PM |
Ever since McMahon and Bischoff made it run-of-the-mill to have owners and commissioners and the like, it seems every promotion has them now. What we want to know is should we keep Jerm and Hamid on-screen, or take them off except in extreme circumstances like Jack Tuney in WWF back in the day? - There is no need to have an on camera-owner always in the mix because it takes up too much time that could go to a debut, or progressing a promo-ing member of the roster.
- WTF WILL WE DO WITHOUT AN ON-SCREEN OWNER?????????????????????? |
|
 First
Previous
2-7 of 7
Next
Last
|
Reply
| |
Just because W2K is what I see it as, Big Indy. I mean lets face it, W2K is huge and granted while a lot of promotions this day in age do have owners and such, W2K is still original with it because Jerm and Hamid hate each other. We've been built upon having a fued and such with certain owners. If those fueds came to a close, then it could work - but I think the owners should still play a roll in the on-camera scene, they just shouldnt be the primary factor. |
|
Reply
| | | From: ¤Ðªn†e¤ | Sent: 5/4/2008 11:49 PM |
- I like on camera owners, gives everyone something else to write about, one more tool in the box. I like to hate the Jerm. I know the comcept is pretty cliche but if the charrie works, it just works. And I like having the two owners, one hell and one face b/c you never know when one of them is going to make a power play and shake things up. |
|
Reply
| |
- There is no need to have an on camera-owner always in the mix because it takes up too much time that could go to a debut, or progressing a promo-ing member of the roster.
Honestly I think that the fued between Jerm and Hamid is pretty cool but I think it'd be better to keep them out of the picture for a bit. I like the idea of having a sort of comissioner who does their bidding instead, then you could sort of have him represent who is winning the power-struggle between the two. |
|
Reply
| |
- WTF WILL WE DO WITHOUT AN ON-SCREEN OWNER?????????????????????? I like on screen owners, they're either going to be the ultimate good or evil and you can push things around that. |
|
Reply
| |
- WTF WILL WE DO WITHOUT AN ON-SCREEN OWNER?????????????????????? W2K without at least Jerm or Hamid on-camera wouldn't seem right these days. |
|
Reply
| |
w2k isn't w2k without the jerm being a bitch to everyone |
|
|
First
Previous
2-7 of 7
Next
Last
|
|
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Return to - Polls