MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Madeleine McCannContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  WELCOME  
  LATEST NEWS  
  PJ FINAL REPORT  
  Member Messages  
  ►►SITE MENU◄◄  
  ►► MESSAGES �?/A>  
  All Messages  
  General  
  Messages For Maddie  
  Madeleine  
  Off Topic  
  Breaking News  
  Pet Memorials  
  MEMBER WELCOME  
  MEET THE MANAGER  
  ►►SUMMARIES◄◄  
  ►►�?MEDIA ◄◄�?/A>  
  NEWSPAPERS  
  Telegraph  
  Newspaper Thread  
  MAY Reports  
  JUNE Reports  
  SUN BOARD  
  TIMES BOARD  
  Daily Mail  
  MIRROR BOARD  
  GUARDIAN BOARD  
  Deleted EXPRESS  
  News Archives  
  News Articles  
  TV Program Links  
  Transcripts  
  TV News  
  Video Links  
  JOURNALISM  
  News Sniffer  
  ►INVESTIGATION�?/A>  
  Interviews  
  Suspicious  
  Re-enactment  
  Subliminal & Propaganda  
  Contrived Abduction  
  Facts  
  'Evidence'  
  Libel Threats  
  Lies  
  Quotes  
  Theories  
  Forged Photos?  
  McCann Travels  
  Timelines  
  FUND INFO  
  Fund  
  FUND INCOME / EXPENSES  
  Fund Compilation  
  FUNDRAISING  
  Fund 'Sources'  
  ►►►PEOPLE◄◄�?/A>  
  Kate McCann  
  Key People  
  Clarence Mitchel  
  Government  
  Brian Kennedy  
  Jon Corner  
  Metodo 3  
  Photofit  
  People MISC  
  Witnesses  
  Family  
  Unknown People  
  Esther McVey  
  Pol. Judiciaria  
  Tapas 7  
  Backers  
  ►►►► INFO◄◄�?/A>  
  Weather  
  The Law  
  Beachy  
  thentherewere4  
  Beachy Posts  
  AMBER ALERT  
  Information  
  M & E Children  
  Statistics  
  HUMAN BEHAVIOUR  
  Body Language  
  ►► CHAT ROOM�?/A>  
  Chat User Guide  
  ►► OPINIONS◄◄  
  Coldwater  
  HiDeHo  
  Jon Gaunt  
  Comments to Note  
  Gerry's Blog  
  Personal Attack  
  Misc Blogs  
  bb2002  
  Tabs poem  
  ►►WEBSITES◄◄  
  mccannfiles.com  
  Website Links  
  ►►PICTURES◄◄  
  Pictures  
  Manager Graphics  
  Pics fo Posting  
  Photo Curiosity  
  Backgrounds  
  ►►FORUMS◄◄  
  Digital Spy  
  Websleuths  
  THE 3 ARGUIDOS  
  3A Thread Lists  
  3A at Brussels Conference  
  3A Smiles  
  3A Ref. Threads  
  3A Distributions  
  3A Leaflets  
  MIRROR FORUM  
  M F Threads  
  Memorable Posts  
  Great Posts  
  Lost Pages  
  ►E-MAIL ADDYS�?/A>  
  ►►COMPUTER ◄◄  
  COMPUTER HELP  
  Computer Tips  
  HOW TO TIPS FOR 3A  
  3A How To Post  
  Avatars  
  ►►�?GAMES◄◄�?/A>  
  Brain Teasers  
  Time Wasters  
  Interesting Fact  
  Funnies  
  Points To Ponder  
  Nostalgia  
  Amateur Sleuth  
  For Skeptics  
  Estelle's Posts  
  Search  
  Priest  
  Remember Madeleine  
  Songs & Lyrics  
  'Source' Info  
  British Police  
  Sheree Dodds  
  PR & Spin  
  Trial  
  Your Web Page  
  3A Here To Stay  
  Documentaries  
  Diary  
  TEAM McCANN  
  Mgzne Interviews  
  TV INTERVIEWS  
  Robert Murat  
  Oprah  
  AMARAL'S BOOK  
  Fridge  
  McCanns History  
  McCann 'Defence'  
  Martin Brunt  
  Statements  
  Apologies  
  Investigate Fund  
  Statement Tables  
  MISC Web Pages  
  Millenium /Tapas  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Video Links : Vid -ANORAK - Madeleine McCann: The Tapas Group’s Movements On Tape
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzy  (Original Message)Sent: 2/12/2008 8:08 PM

Madeleine McCann: The Tapas Group’s Movements On Tape

PAULO Reis in Portugal writes on Madeleine McCann:

A team headed by two university professors has created a computer-animated video with the movements of the Tapas group, during the crucial hours, on May 3, before Kate McCann found Madeleine was missing. The two experts, Paulo Sargento and Paulo Gamito, based their study on time lines and statements from witnesses published by The Times, BBC and the Portuguese newspapers Público and Sol.

Paulo Sargento told TV channel SIC that after the McCann arrived at the restaurant, almost every 5 minutes there was somebody leaving the table…going out to the apartments or coming from that direction �?7 persons went out 14 times in a period of two hours.The criminal expert considered the possibility of a kidnap as “not consistent�?with so many regular checkings. “It will be very difficult, there was a very short period of time�?available for a kidnapper to act, without being spotted, he said. The team is now working on another virtual scenario: a walk from Ocean Club to the church.

Spotter: Paulo Reis



First  Previous  2-7 of 7  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/12/2008 8:17 PM

146 Responses to “Madeleine McCann: The Tapas Group’s Movements On Tape�?/H3>
  1. 1
    Carmen Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:03 am

    I’m lonely in here!

  2. 2
    fence sitter Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:10 am

    not any more

  3. 3
    Carmen Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:16 am

    Ah good!
    So, can we debate the relative merits of a computer programme based on ‘reports from newspapers�?being able to untangle the time line?

  4. 4
    Pollyanna Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:16 am

    Anorak is early today. He never has his new threads up before 9AM.

    Boo Hoo - I wanted to be the first today�? ;-(

  5. 5
    Tony Bennett Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:23 am

    Computer programs like this are very useful and in this case appear to show that an abductor would have little chance of entering the apartment and removing Madeleine without being seen by one of the ‘Tapas 9�? But another thing they can do is expose those making contradictory statements as liars. Which I am sure this program did in this case.

    To assume that all members of the Tapas 9 may be lying about the day’s events is I think a very usefiul starting point in analysing this case

  6. 6
    Pollyanna Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:30 am

    Tony Bennett - do you ever sleep? If I didn’t know better, I’d have thought you’re a wind up doll or a robot at least�?lol!

    Really, I do believe you must eat breathe and sleep the Madeleine McCann case. At least when you do sleep, you are still dreaming and processing this information and storyline. Come now, fess up here!

  7. 7
    Pollyanna Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:33 am

    Well - It’s 11:30pm out West here. We are just going to sleep and it’s still just October 8th. Fancy that one�?Sleepless in Seattle.

    Good night or Good morning wherever you are�?

  8. 8
    Carmen Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:45 am

    5 Tony Bennett
    I can agree on a computer analysis as a good tool, but based on newspaper time lines?
    That seems as much use as one based on forum theories!

  9. 9
    soothsayer Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:51 am

    morning all,as with all computers they only process the information that is fed to them using programs that have been installed and written by humans also.there are so many discrepencies in the statements of the tapas9 (allegedly),that the computer could throw up any number of scenarios,again any results are interpretated by humans,as they see them.i have seen reports that flatly contradict what is being fed into the computers,the people who will find the answer are the police the have the power and are in a position to know all of the available evidence,leave it to them.

  10. 10
    bc Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:54 am

    I find it odd that
    1.Gerry wanted to be the only spokes person for his group
    2.That the Find Madeleine site does not have a direct link to other missing children or feature a missing child a day, but Gerry can go to the White House to promote missing children
    3.That in his blog he appeal to the abductor includes the word ‘accident�?BR>4.That one of the family at home, I think his sister apparently said that the abductor could have drugged Madeleine, I think this may have been just before the forensics were due back
    5. That their ‘own baby sitting arrangements were not more streamlined if all the apartments were all close to each other - a lot of disruption to their meal without offering more protection for the children
    6.That the family at home were apparently told in the first phone call that the flat had been clearly broken into which did not appear to be the case from other reports
    I also find it odd that I am sitting here in the early morning worrying about it so much.

  11. 11
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:56 am

    considering there was a pub quiz on

    its like musical bleeding chairs

  12. 12
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:58 am

    Gerry McCann told of an “extraordinary experience�?inside the church in Praia da Luz just days after Madeleine’s disappearance. The experience inspired him to launch the global campaign to find his daughter.

    He said: “I had this mental image of being in a tunnel and instead of the light at the end of the tunnel being extremely narrow and a distant spot, the light opened up and the tunnel got wider and wider and went in many different directions �? I can’t say it was a vision because I am not clear what a vision is but I had a mental image and it certainly helped me decide. I became a man possessed that night. The next day I was up at dawn, making phone calls.�?/P>

    i anxiously look forward to more cgi of mccann and crew. i would love to see this moment in gerry’s life computer animated with carmina burana swelling as he becomes ‘a man possessed�?

  13. 13
    PeterMac Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:59 am

    Nice one. But the police should have done this. It is a classic way of trapping the guilty. You ask questions but do not contradict at any stage, You let the subject build up a huge and elaborate story, and you both concentrate on the end of the story, not the beginning or the middle.
    Then you let them dictate it, in the form of a signed statement with the warning about perjury.
    And then, and only then, do you casually observe that one of the key pillars of their story is in fact wrong, inaccurate, or even a lie.
    And for a few moments you watch as they wriggle and squirm and try to think of a way to keep the story together.
    And they fail, and you start again, this time with a Voluntary Statement, amounting to a full and frank confession.
    It is what makes being a cop so rewarding.

  14. 14
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:59 am

    me too bc

    still …………�?.maddie deserves to have people care about what happens/ed to her

    a job her parents should have done on may 3

  15. 15
    soothsayer Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:06 am

    peter mac i think the fact that the PJstopped looking for a living Madeleine months ago,perhaps infers that they know or have reasonable grounds for suspicion,as to the validity of certain statements from certain parties and as to the fate of Madeleine.

  16. 16
    matty Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:26 am

    Peter Mac quote- And they fail, and you start again, this time with a Voluntary Statement, amounting to a full and frank confession.

    Or as has been reported (I think,mods admin libel thing) the Mcs said “no comment�?40 times.

  17. 17
    Yankee Interloper Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:30 am

    I’ve been lurking on this site for weeks, fascinated by the British reaction to this case, and here are some observations I feel compelled to share:

    -First and foremost, when you make fun of people’s names (i.e. Gerrykins, Comical Clarie, McConns, Phatomina, etc, etc, ad nauseum) it makes you sound about five years old. Most people realize somewhere between the ages of five and ten that people cannot help the names they are given, and that therefore it’s a really cheap shot to make fun of their names. It doesn’t make you look clever, it makes it look like you can’t figure out what’s a valid reason to mock someone. Please stop it immediately and pass this on to your fellow countrymen, or risk being called “quaint hobbit people�?by the rest of the world from now on.

    -Ditto for making up “parody songs�?based on real songs but inserting your “funny names�?for people and forcing atrocious near-rhymes into unholy juxtaposition with each other. There is a reason songs are written by professional songwriters, please do not attempt this, at least not in public where others can be exposed to it.

    -Posting lyrics for entire songs is also right out. Everyone else has Google too, it will save us all a lot of time and bandwidth if you just post the name of the song you’re thinking of, although to be honest, it’s really pretty pointless. Yes, there are lots of songs about lying people. No, that’s not really that clever of an observation.

    Moving on to science, which for some reason we in the US had been led to believe Brits were good at:

    -”Sniffer dogs�?are considered in the United States to be police officers equivalent to human ones. This is because they are incredibly reliable and don’t know how to lie. It is naive to think that just because your pet gets excited at lots of smells, a trained canine officer is similarly easy to distract. If the sniffer dogs say they smelled cadaverine or blood, their indicating they have found these scents is evidence by itself, as any officer’s observation would be.

    -There are some bodily fluids that don’t get outside the body unless serious bodily harm has occurred, such as cerebrospinal fluid. If you find cerebrospinal fluid, and the person it came from is not in a hospital, you can be pretty sure they are dead.

    -Please take this to heart and apply it to all future situations: WHENEVER you come across someone who has built a miraculous machine of their own devise, which is based on “secret�?scientific principles that they are not willing to explain to you, go ahead and assume they are lying to you. You do not need to waste any further effort trying to collect anecdotal reports of their success or failure in the past, or imagining what incredible breakthrough the “secret�?scientific principles will be revealed to be. It’s a trick. Get an axe.

    -DNA testing can be done two ways, a quick way, where they test only a portion of the points of information in the DNA, and a long way, where they examine all the points of information in the DNA that they can. Apparently, the original DNA tests were quick tests on samples so degraded that they could only get 80 percent accuracy, and your forensic science service is now conducting the longer type of test, which will be much more accurate even with the degradation. This is taking a long time because they are doing a lot more work. Please be patient, nobody is trying to stall anybody, this is just how science works.

    And finally, on whether or not it is “right�?to even be having this conversation:

    -No, you are not doing anything “useful�?or “good�?by speculating back and forth endlessly on this case.

    -Neither are you doing anything “bad�?or “libelous�?

    -Your are simply exercising free speech, which is its own purpose. It does not need to benefit anyone or accomplish anything, it is merely a human urge that you have the right to satisfy. If your country’s laws do not agree, then simply point your legislators to the United States Declaration of Independence, in which we clearly state that you are endowed by your Creator with the right to speculate freely and wildly on any topic of your choosing, even if it hurts someone’s feelings and is of no benefit to anyone, and so therefore anyone who tries to repress you can suck it.

    As for the case itself, the thing that makes it so fascinating is that all explanations are equally implausible. Given the facts as they are presented to us, the McCanns simply did not have the time or the materials to hide and then preserve the body (no, “clingfilm�?would NOT work, please just trust me on this and do not try it at home with small dead animals, that’s digusting), yet also the chances of a stranger abduction in a luxury resort are astronomically low. It is a mystery! Clearly, some crucial facts are missing.

    However, luckily we live in an age where DNA testing will allow us to rule some things out. If Madeleine’s DNA is in that hire car, there is absolutely no question the parents are guilty of disposing of her body, and thus probably of killing her, accidentally or not. If the DNA is not present, then we’ll probably never know for sure just what happened, and the likeliest explanation may be that she wandered down to the sea and drowned or fell in a construction hole and was covered by falling debris.

    Until the forensic results are finally in, or someone confesses, feel free to carry on your god-given right to say any damn thing you want! Just please, for the love of all that is right and good in the world, no more “silly names�?

    Have a nice day.

  18. 18
    matty Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:36 am

    Do you think they beeen given a nod and a wink from their legal advisers that the new Chief will have them back asap to answer a few questions, possibly around 40. Hence the reported possible voluntary return to Portugal to voluntarily visit friends and voluntarily visit religious places and possibly voluntarily visit the PJ to voluntarily answer said questions and possibly voluntarily visit their lawyers to see if their aguido status has been removed.

  19. 19
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:36 am

    Yankee Interloper

    ‘First and foremost, when you make fun of people’s names (i.e. Gerrykins, Comical Clarie, McConns, Phatomina, etc, etc, ad nauseum) it makes you sound about five years old. Most people realize somewhere between the ages of five and ten that people cannot help the names they are given, and that therefore it’s a really cheap shot to make fun of their names. It doesn’t make you look clever, it makes it look like you can’t figure out what’s a valid reason to mock someone. Please stop it immediately and pass this on to your fellow countrymen, or risk being called “quaint hobbit people�?by the rest of the world from now on.�?/P>

    Your right, I can’t help the fact that my parents called me Willoughby and I grrew up on a council estate in Grimsby!

    I think it ironic that Americans dare offer anyone advice on how the rest of the world perceive them.

  20. 20
    Stickler Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:39 am

    Yankee Interloper, if they are all like you at home, then I support any attempt your President may care to make for the USA to be re-admitted to the British Empire.

  21. 21
    Ronald McDonald Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:40 am

    Just one thing�?what kind of a name is Yankee Interloper? LOL
    Couldn’t resist�?/P>

    …is all

  22. 22
    GBH Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:40 am

    What worries me about all this is that the Maddie story could become one of those unsolved crimes that always has people guessing.

    So many people question the behaviour of the McCann family but how on earth can you say how someone should behave in these circumstances?

    If my daughter went missing my head would be in a complete mess and I wouldn’t cope with the media attention that they have had.

    Until Chief Wiggum and Co get their act together how can anyone use such ridiculous rumour to build a case against the McCanns?
    Why did the police not seal the ports and check boats etc on within the first 12 hours of her disappearance? I would have thought that was obvious but that’s my point - I wasn’t there, I am not a policeman and I am not involved.

    Why don’t people get back to discussing the route an abductor might have taken rather than the Tapas 9 or whatever you anoraks like to call them?

  23. 23
    soothsayer Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:40 am

    yankee thats us told then,i’ll just get my coat�?.er no on second thoughts why dont you get your coat and while your at it give america back to the Indians.

  24. 24
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:42 am

    Morning soothayer.

    Any news from Brum?

  25.  


Reply
 Message 3 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/12/2008 8:18 PM
  • 25
    PeterMac Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:43 am

    15 Soothsayer
    16 Mattie
    Quite so !
    And as an aside, IF there has been a cover up of some sort, how does the main guilty party ENSURE the continued silence for all time of all the rest. It could cost millions !

  • 26
    GBH Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:44 am

    What news could there be in Brum?

  • 27
    matty Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:44 am

    Yankee Interloper quote–”Sniffer dogs�?are considered in the United States to be police officers equivalent to human ones. This is because they are incredibly reliable and don’t know how to lie. It is naive to think that just because your pet gets excited at lots of smells, a trained canine officer is similarly easy to distract. If the sniffer dogs say they smelled cadaverine or blood, their indicating they have found these scents is evidence by itself, as any officer’s observation would be.

    The Mcs have reportedly had their legal team contact an American lawyer who reportedly had sniffer dog evidence in a case in America discredited by a judge .The sniffer dog evidence was a contributing factor to the man getting a custodial sentence.

  • 28
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:46 am

    GBH

    ‘What news could there be in Brum?�?/P>

    soothsayer understands nudge, nudge, wink, wink ;-)

  • 29
    Legui Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:47 am

    We don’t have free speech in the UK, we have somnething even better, JS Mill’s harm principle, as in say what you like as long as it does not harm someone, plus hyour liberty ends where someone else’s begins.

    This means that with Nazi hate sites we just close them down, rather than protect them like in the US.

    Please go on the Sun Website and expound your trite observations, because on their forum they think that they have freedom of speech from watching too much US TV all the time, so you will get a more ready and credulous audience, which is obviously what you need, like the McConns.

  • 30
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:51 am

    yankee, i hope you’ll interlope again.

  • 31
    GBH Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:52 am

    UK papers are this morning stating that certain police officers are under inquiry for alledgedly beating confessions out of people.

    If this is the case how can these people be trusted? We had this in the UK in the 70’s and early 80’s where innocent people were ’stitched�?up. They served time (Birmingham 6 etc) before being released.

    Should these people have ever been allowed to interview the McCanns?

    Can you ever believe anyone (the unanswered 40 questions rumour etc) that beats confessions out of people?

    It’s funny how you’ll all moan about Guantanemo Bay being a brutal place but the McCanns must be guilty if they don’t answer the questions that were put to them by aggressive interrogators!

  • 32
    GBH Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:55 am

    A detective who interrogated Kate McCann is to face trial over accusations that he beat up an innocent man during a police interview.

    Tavares Almeida and two other Portuguese officers will be tried over claims they assaulted a robbery suspect and left him with four broken ribs and severe bruising to his throat, stomach and back.

    The chief inspector is the second senior detective on the Madeleine McCann inquiry to be implicated in allegations of violence towards suspects in other cases.

    His boss Goncalo Amaral was accused of helping to cover up an assault on the mother of another missing girl.

  • 33
    soothsayer Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:56 am

    morning will,all i know is that the PJ are and always have been on the right track,despite what you have been hearing the samples are from the renault, the apartment and area around the stairs,again rumour and i cannot stress that enough, says that there are no doubts as to these results and the indications of a corpse having been responsible for large parts of the results.any one ever stop and think what kind of life the twins will have,as they grow up due to this case,worst scenario is that the case is not solved,twins will be forever tainted by association,we all know how cruel kids can be to one and other,once kids start repeating what their parents or family say human nature being what it is,noy a very nice prospect.the twins as Madeleine is,are helpless innocents in all of this.

  • 34
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:56 am

    matty,

    american solicitors, like many solicitors of different nationalities, will often do anything for money and/or attention. this doesn’t degrade the accuracy of sniffer dogs.

  • 35
    matty Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:56 am

    New head of enquiry was supposed to have been appointed yesterday,Paulo Rebelo. Sorry if this has already been posted, too many to read. Wasn’t he the officer that suggested the Mcs be brought in for questioning?

  • 36
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:57 am

    Have asked this before.

    Do you think it is ever justified in the search for justice to apply a little physical persuasion in obtaining a confession or evidence that will help secure a conviction?

    This applies to any cases not just this one.

  • 37
    GBH Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:59 am

    Soothsayer

    Is it kids that are cruel or is it the adults that will gossip and rumour and suggest that they know something more about a case than they really do?

  • 38
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 8:59 am

    anyone else read about the de-scrambled paedo photo interpol is asking the world to help id? http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/127199/paedophiles-photograph-unscrambled-by-interpol.html

  • 39
    SteveT Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:02 am

    Yankee Interloper,

    1). No one over here believed in the “miraculous machine�? It was our press just trying to fill up pages with a tongue in cheek report to go along with the many others.
    2). The names thing can be but down to the British sense of humour. We like to break down serious matters sometimes with a bit of humour. Likewise, the songs.
    Did you know that one out of three Americans weighs as much as the other two?

  • 40
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:03 am

    Without defending the timelines provided by the group, I think it is too much to ask people who have spent a night out drinking to provide precise accounts of their movements.

    I would guess they checked less often than stated, but have no way of knowing if this is true or not.
    Often I don’t wear a watch on holiday - and how time flies when I’m here on anorak! Sometimes we lose all track of time.

  • 41
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:03 am

    soothsayer

    you are not wrong - there is a syingthat says ‘�?the sons always pay for the crimes of the fathers�?

    Did you see my post yesterday that stated that cadaverine cannot be removed from car air conditioning systems and rubber as used in door window seals?

  • 42
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:03 am

    interpol link international paedo search: http://www.interpol.int/

  • 43
    matty Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:05 am

    Thea- I am not discrediting the abilities of sniffer dogs, if they were useless what would be the point in the high cost of using them. What I was saying was, if a judge can have the sniffer dog evidence thrown out as a means to send a man down it could open the flood gates for other cases. Hence reportedly the Mcs lawyers contacting the lawyers on the American case.
    I am lead to believe that the Porugese judge will not use sniffer dog evidence alone to charge the Mcs.

  • 44
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:07 am

    Am I the only one thinking if I recognised the person in the interpol pic, there wouldnt be much for the old bill to apprehend?

    Also will publishing the pic force this scum (will not dignify with term man) to go underground?

  • 45
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:08 am

    41, Will,
    I noticed your post - what were you up to, making cadaverine?! What an interesting life.

  • 46
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:10 am

    will i don’t believe violent actions by the police are ever justified and simply jeapordise the case and public’s faith in them to uphold the law and protect.

  • 47
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:11 am

    Rosemary

    I believe (as stated last week) the key to this case lies in reconstructing everything and applying everything that is known to all sensible theories.

  • 48
    Jim P Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:12 am

    Two point:

    1) When you see Portuguese written down, it looks like Spanish. When you hear it, it sounds so different it takes me a while to recognise it as a Latin language.

    2) Yankee Interloper’s point: As for the case itself, the thing that makes it so fascinating is that all explanations are equally implausible. Given the facts as they are presented to us, the McCanns simply did not have the time or the materials to hide and then preserve the body (no, “clingfilm�?would NOT work, please just trust me on this and do not try it at home with small dead animals, that’s digusting), yet also the chances of a stranger abduction in a luxury resort are astronomically low. It is a mystery! Clearly, some crucial facts are missing.

    I agree wholeheartedly. I suspect we’ve been told some major fib about events: perhaps no one saw Maddie on the fateful day at all. And why hasn’t the British press tracked down other holiday makers at the resort? It is so unusual for there to be so few eye independent witnesses produced, especially in a case of this size, and no, I don’t believe this is due to the Portuguese secrety laws.

  • 49
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:13 am

    36, Will,
    I suggest truth drugs and hypnosis.

  • 50
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:13 am

    will, i hope not. maybe they’re already on his trial? i thought it interesting because someone on this forum stated interpol doesn’t work on missing children or paedo cases and also the amazing technology which has brought this criminal’s face to light.


  • Reply
     Message 4 of 7 in Discussion 
    From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/12/2008 8:19 PM
  • 50
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:13 am

    will, i hope not. maybe they’re already on his trial? i thought it interesting because someone on this forum stated interpol doesn’t work on missing children or paedo cases and also the amazing technology which has brought this criminal’s face to light.

  • 51
    Soothsayer Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:15 am

    gbh my tenet in life is and always has been make up your own mind,do you think Madeleine knew any one who was and is violent,some one close to her perhaps,can you make up your own mind on that,or perhaps you will prefer to say you don’t know,which does not mean that some one out there does not know the answer,be it yes or no.i realy do wish we were discussing something more pleasant,but the public have woken up to the fact that the press here are feeding us a crock of shit,i think the simple reason is that they are making a fortune out of selling papers,simple financial mercanaries,at the expense of the truth and above all the life of Madeleine.

  • 52
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:15 am

    thea

    I am not disagreeing with you - I am just interested in the differing answers.

    You say that any use of violence leads to loss of faith in the police by the public. However, it could be argued that the public lose more faith in the police every time a ‘guilty�?suspect walks free, having never faced trial due to the police having to conduct themselves within tight restraints, whilst by defenition criminals don’t. Not saying its what I believe but the argument does exist.

  • 53
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:18 am

    50, Thea,
    I think this paedophile was careless to use an off-the-shelf computer programme to scramble an image.
    One identified it wouldn’t be difficult to reverse the programme and reveal the original image.
    It would have been wise to have understood the technology if he intended to use it as a cover-up.

  • 54
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:18 am

    Rosemary

    I am warming to truth drugs - know nothing about how effective they are but sounds good in theory.

    Not sure about hypnosis, but if Paul McKenna was in the interview room I would confess straightaway rather than hear him drone on and on!

  • 55
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:20 am

    morning all

    two points to add - can’t see numbers so sorry!!

    Pic of paedophile - i thought it looked a lot like someone we often discuss on this forum!!!

    And as far as I’m aware the Birmingham 6 were not acquited- they were released because their conviction was found to be unsafe. They never explained the TNT underneath some of their finger nails etc. I get thoroughly cheesed off when people are released from prison on a technicality and they are reported as being ‘innocent�?/P>

    I remember a mother being released because an expert had stood up in court and claimed the likely hood of all three of her children dieing from Sudden Infant Death syndrome was (can’t rememeber the figures) but say 350mill to one. Later his evidence was disclaimed and though the figure was still over a million to one chance of this happening - she was released. She was never acquited, nor were the Birmingham six.

    If they had a retrial with the new evidence who knows what the outcome would have been (I suspect they would still have been found guilty).

  • 56
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:20 am

    i see your point matty. i agree sniffer dogs alone won’t stand up in court. i don’t know how portuguese court deals with so called “experts�? in the states they are often used to cause confusion so beyond reasonable doubt is reached without a doubt. causing a hung jury or not guilty verdict. with portuguese courts i understand the trial is conducted by 3 judges and possibly a jury . hopefully if a jury’s decision has any weight it is thoughtfully and judiciously measured by the presiding judges.

  • 57
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:20 am

    53,
    Once, not one identified, I meant to say

  • 58
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:23 am

    54, Will,

    Yes, I bet Paul McKenna has this figured.

  • 59
    Carmen Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:23 am

    SteveT Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:02 am
    Did you know that one out of three Americans weighs as much as the other two?

    Thank-you for the science lesson Steve - I’d always believed that hot air was weightless. Silly me.

  • 60
    Teddy Boy Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:24 am

    So the PJ man is an out and out bastard because he is alleged to have beaten a suspect (never happened here I imagine), whereas our boys in blue are the worlds finest because all they do is pump 15 bullets into a totally innocent man, whose only crime appears to be hurrying to catch his train.
    The press in this country are going overboard in their efforts to portray the PJ as Third World bunglers and the McCanns as paragons of virtue - what are they going to do when these shits are wearing prison weeds?

  • 61
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:27 am

    Rosemary

    It was recently announced that Paul McKenna was the UKs biggest selling non-fiction author. I don’t know what my point is - but another bit of trivia to the collection lol

  • 62
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:29 am

    Teddy Boy

    Todays front pages (only a glance at the newsagents at this stage) seem to be very different to yesterdays!

  • 63
    Carmen Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:29 am

    Matty
    Rebelo was the officer that investigated the famous Lisbon paedophile ring many years ago.

  • 64
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:29 am

    rosemary,

    i am not a computer imaging expert but i feel the german specialists who descrambled the photo deserve credit. i personally don’t care if the paedo was ‘careless�?with his programme choice. even the most organised criminals make mistakes. i for one am thankful. since this is a forum about an alleged missing child i thought the subject matter relevant.

  • 65
    matty Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:31 am

    Teddy Boy-Good move on the Porugese officials side to get this man off the case, whether he is the bogey man or not, whether they demoted or promoted him in his new position. Imagine the press the case would get if the Mcs are charged and the bogey man is still head of investigation. I would imagine there will be no dirt to dish on the new bloke. He is described as a veteran and I think the new bloke was the one that suggested the Mcs be taken in for questioning.

  • 66
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:32 am

    36 will

    Are you kidding? The answer is NO and must always be that.

  • 67
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:35 am

    The Real Stig

    Am I kidding? No, I think it is a valid question. Can I ask you why you say no?

  • 68
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:36 am

    64, thea,

    I agree, all credit to the German computer specialists, and yes the story is relevant - thought so myself when I read it last night.

  • 69
    matty Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:36 am

    New head of investigation and Clarences talk of the Mcs making a voluntary return to Portugal. Good advice on the voluntary return looks a bit better that they are already in the country when they are asked to go back in to be requestioned. ie well we were having dinner and quiz at the Tapas bar and just popped in to see the new head for a coffee.

  • 70
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:36 am

    will, i didn’t think we were disagreeing only discussing the pros an cons of police brutality. although i see your pov, i still believe the police have to maintain diplomacy. i think they can use other forms of coercion like psychological which can be even more effective than physical harm.

    i do see your point but feel conflicted because if they do employ violence to get a confession or important information then this will be tainted. if it doesn’t effect the outcome of that trial then it will eventually come back to haunt them. so i don’t believe the shortsightedness of violence or even physical threats is beneficial in the long term.

  • 71
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:38 am

    An excerpt from the UK times article this morning.

    “Meanwhile, in the latest blow to the police investigation, it was revealed that the Portuguese detective who questioned Mrs McCann is being prosecuted for allegedly torturing an innocent robbery suspect.

    Tavares Almeida was the deputy head of the inquiry but recently asked to be taken off the case on unpaid leave.

    It has emerged that he is facing trial for allegedly inflicting a severe beating on innocent man along with two other police officers.

    The Portuguese daily newspaper Jornal de Noticias reported that 48-year-old Almeida will face trial over allegations that seven years ago he beat up a railway worker suspected of being part of a notorious gang who sexually assaulted children in a park and coerced them into mugging people.

    The suspect, who suffered four broken ribs and bruising to his throat, stomach and back, was later acquitted of all charges at trial.

    The Policia Judiciaria refused to comment on the allegations, as did the McCann family’s spokesman�?/P>

  • 72
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:39 am

    63, Carmen,
    The Lisbon case is ongoing - not ancient history!

  • 73
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:40 am

    35 noseycow

    When you think statistical probability is enough to convict someone of a crime, you no longer have a legal system, you have a casino.

  • 74
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:42 am

    Tuesday, 9 October 2007
    Paulo Rebelo is the new man in charge of Madeleine’s case
    A national deputy-director of Polícia Judiciária was appointed to replace Gonçalo Amaral in the investigation of Madeleine’s disappearance. Paulo Rebelo has a career in the investigation of drug trafficking, but was also in charge the “Mea-Culpa case�? 10 years ago, where 13 persons died in an arson. He was also in charge of a recent investigation about a leak of information from the “Freeport case�? when documents from a corruption investigation were sent to the Press and published the day before the last Parliament elections in Portugal. Those documents allegedly showed a connection between the case and the leader of Socialist Party, José Sócrates, now Prime-Minister. A PJ inspector was accused and later sentenced to eight months in prison (suspended sentence) for making copies of confidential documents and giving it to journalists.


  • Reply
     Message 5 of 7 in Discussion 
    From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/12/2008 8:19 PM
  • 75
    Tracey Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:42 am

    Isn’t it strange that there have been none of those ‘I know Gerry and Kate and they are wonderful/psychotic/aliens etc�?stories from friends, enemies, patients, fellow villagers?
    Normally these people crawl from the woodwork at the mere hint of scandal, yet so far the only character references have come predominantly from the ‘Tapas group�?
    Just seems odd.

  • 76
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:42 am

    thea

    Thanks for the well thought out answer.

    The reason I ask the question is the conflict you mention. I do not have a fixed opinion on this one, which is why I ask the question.

    On a basic level I think beating the shit out of someone to gain a confession is wrong, period.

    On the other hand if a child abuser or drug dealer were to be banged up and off the streets as a result of a couple of let hooks…………�?

  • 77
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:43 am

    36, Will

    Do you think it is ever justified in the search for justice to apply a little physical persuasion in obtaining a confession or evidence that will help secure a conviction?

    The problem with that question Will is that what actually constitutes as a “little physical persausion�?will vary from police force to police force. That would be very difficult to control.

  • 78
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:45 am

    my point real stig was that this probability was a small (some may say insignificant) part of the trial, but because it was later refuted the conviction - from all of the evidence, was deemed to be ‘unsafe�?and was therefore overturned. In my mind this does not amount to the person being innocent. Just entitled to huge amounts of money from the British taxpayer.

  • 79
    Soothsayer Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:47 am

    http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2007/10/mccann-lawyers-warning-to-prosecutor.html now why would they do that,you would think that they might have the savvy to wait until some one was charged,perhaps they know some one is going to be,sort of get your retaliation in first.

  • 80
    Will Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:48 am

    dora

    good point - one mans high jinx is anothers assualt.

    the question that then needs to be answered is - in the pursuit of criminals how much does the end justify the means.

  • 81
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:51 am

    will,

    i know what you mean and completely understand. i empathise with the police and detectives. i think they have a really difficult important role in society and are often not paid very well and sadly hated just for wearing the uniform. i respect officers of the law but cast a slightly jaundiced eye for proper balance. power is known to corrupt and it is foolish to believe the police impervious to temptations or are perfect law officers when dealing with such disgusting people on a regular basis.

  • 82
    bc Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:51 am

    Jim 9.12 am
    I agree, where are all the witnesses. Normally the newspapers find many people who want to tell their ’story�?

    Even if the police want events kept quiet for quite legitimate reasons, there are usually people who want the attention prepared to tell all they know, especially if they are no longer in Portugal.

    I have always wondered if Madeleine could initally have been in one of the other apartments, and could even have been taken back to uk very early on, a day or two- 4th or 5th May perhaps. No-one would have been looking out for that at the beginning as all the attention was on PDL.
    This case could easily end up like
    Who shot JFK
    Did America go to the moon
    What really happened to Marilyn Monroe
    What really happened to Princess Diana

  • 83
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:51 am

    A little light relief-

    A gendarme in Paris last Friday night pulled over a driver who had

    been weaving in and out of the traffic.

    He approached the car window and said “Sir I need you to blow into

    this breathalyser�?

    The man reaches into his pocket and produces a doctor’s note. On it

    was written:

    “This man suffers from chronic asthma. Do not make him perform any

    action that may leave him short of breath�?

    The gendarme said “Okay then I need you to come and give a blood

    sample�?/P>

    The man produced another letter. This one said: “This man is a

    haemophiliac. Please do not cause him to bleed in any way�?

    So the officer said: “Right, I need a urine sample then�?

    The man produces a third letter from his pocket.

    It read: “This man plays rugby for New Zealand , please don’t take the piss

    out of him�?/P>

  • 84
    SteveT Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:54 am

    Soothsayer

    Don’t go any further! What planet are they on. Why not wave a red flag to a bull!

  • 85
    Roger Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:55 am

    If the PJ team were led by two people under invstigation for beating confessions out of people, that would be enough for the McCann’s to very reasonably leave Portugal and obtain the services of leading extradition lawyers, in my view. The knowledge of their alleged brutality together with very probable “threats�?which were made during interrogation, or questioning, would be enough to get out of there as fast as possible. If this is the way the Portuguese police behave who would want to go there?

  • 86
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:56 am

    watching that video was bizzare
    it was similar to watching a playstation 2 version of a film you watched last summer!

    will they do a police version of the missing hours with tennis, creche, and restaurant timings?

  • 87
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:58 am

    true. statistics do reduce the world to one big roulette wheel. which is why they also shouldn’t be used in arguments attempting to prove why it was okay for the mccanns and tapas 7 to leave their children without sitters.

  • 88
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:59 am

    67 will

    What do you do about all the truly innocent people to whom a beating is administered. If you were wrongly arrested and beaten, would you be happy with that knowing occasionally it helps convict a real criminal?

    If the Police are allowed to beat confessions out of people, they will come to accept the method as normal and will do it regularly. Not only that, but if a ‘little�?force proves helpful, and you have someone for whom it doesn’t seem to work, why not use a bit more force until there is a regular procession of ambulances carrying away the bodies from police stations to the morgues.

    I could go on and on but if you don’t get it, you don’t get it.

  • 89
    Madeleine McCann: DNA Jigsaw, Torture And The Twilight Zone » Anorak News Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 9:59 am

    […] - Madeleine McCann: The Tapas Grou .. […]

  • 90
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:00 am

    74, thea
    You may well ask why a trial investigating paedophilia in a childrens home, which opened in 2004 is ongoing.
    Princess Diana died 10 years ago and her inquest isn’t over.

  • 91
    JS Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:00 am

    wonder is the house bugged in england

  • 92
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:02 am

    roger,

    if one bases where they travel upon alleged reports of police brutality, government corruption and the like we’d never leave our own backyards. or are you one of those?

  • 93
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:03 am

    theres a new thread

    1 for pr mc cann and 1 for the armchair detectives

  • 94
    Tracey Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:03 am

    Ooohhhhh - if they’re doing Playstation games can we have one where we have a secret machine that can find missing DNA?
    The game could take place in Portugal and you have to run around the streets, apartments and beaches collecting DNA while being chased by evil PJs and newspaper reporters.

  • 95
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:03 am

    75, Tracey,
    I have seen some TV interviews with their neighbours who said they seemed to be a good caring family etc.,etc.
    If there haven’t been many, it is probably an indication that their friends are loyal.

  • 96
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:04 am

    rosemary, to which paedo case are you referring? i hadn’t asked any questions. not that i am not interested. just confused a little by your comment.

  • 97
    Roger Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:08 am

    Are we supposed to be here or on another anorak page?

  • 98
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:10 am

    Rosemary - no one can know what goes on in a family apart from those directly involved. Everything about the McC’s is just TOO perfect, any other couple would have someone come forward and tell a story about when K or G shouted at their kids for no reason. I think that G is one of those people who has to show the world a ‘perfect�?family regardless of what the actual truth is. Maybe there is some truth about Madeleine and the Charge Syndrome? Perhaps she was reaching an age when it was getting difficult to cover up her problems?
    Word in the hospitals is that G McC is a ‘hard nosed b@@@@@d�?/FONT> but most people their are not familiar with the family man - only G the cardiologist.

  • 99
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:10 am

    96, thea,
    I thought you were referring to the Casa Pia case, which hasn’t concluded

    “Mr Rebelo has previously worked in the central investigation department specialising in narcotics. He was also involved in a long investigation into a paedophile scandal at a state children’s home in the capital, Lisbon, allegedly involving senior establishment figures. The case is ongoing.�?/P>

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,,2186792,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront

    It is hard to find an up-to-date link on this case in English.


  • Reply
     Message 6 of 7 in Discussion 
    From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/12/2008 8:20 PM
  • 100
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:11 am

    78 noseycow

    She was acquitted, which means innocent in the eyes of the law. If you want to consider your opinions superior to the legal system, that is your prerogative. The Paediatricians opinion and expertise was not a minor factor in the case.

  • 101
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:11 am

    80, Will,

    Again that will vary depending on the police force. Would you perfer to be jailed in Thailand or the US for drug charges? Every country has different ethics, policing policies and will exert force according to how they view the offence.

  • 102
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:12 am

    real stig - are you changing youe mind about the use of statistics in court???

  • 103
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:13 am

    98, noseycow,

    I agree, nobody knows what goes on behind closed doors.
    That’s why bugging is so helpful!

  • 104
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:15 am

    with you there Rosemary - I wouldn’t mind being bugged - might give someone a laugh if they could be bothered to plough through the chaos of my family life!!

  • 105
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:16 am

    99 rosemary

    Do you mean a link detailing the current progress and outcome?

  • 106
    Tracey Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:18 am

    Jeez, if they bugged my house they would be carting me off in an instant.

  • 107
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:21 am

    Tracey - I assume we’d all be carted off - just for being on this site!!!! and on that note I’m off to bed - was a long hard night shift..though fortunately no cadavarine (is that how it’s spelt)!!

  • 108
    Roger Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:23 am

    Thea, I am quite prepared to believe that some countries have brutal police forces. Portugal is no stranger to these allegations see for example: CERD 65th session: Report of Portugal; UNITED NATIONS
    Press Release, 13 August 2004- random google page.

    If you get entangled with them then you may have cause to be scared. Police brutality cannot be justified regardless of whether the suspect is later proven to be guilty. If we wish to describe ourselves as civilised we have to maintain some minimum standards.

  • 109
    Garth Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:24 am

    Tony Bennett Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:23 am
    Abuse? click date link above, then copy the URL/web address from your browser & email it here
    Computer programs like this are very useful and in this case appear to show that an abductor would have little chance of entering the apartment and removing Madeleine without being seen by one of the ‘Tapas 9�?

    What a load of crap!

    The first thing that strikes me odd about that statement is how the McCann haters find it incredulous that they could of left the tots on their own in that apartment with the ‘out of sight out of mind�?attitude they believe they Mc’s had. Oh and it takes about 5 mins to walk to the apartment. And now it is claimed that there would of been little chance of someone taking Madeleine without being seen due to the regular number of checks!

    So which is it?

    Which ever one suits is the answer.

    Anyway, I thought one of those at the tapas bar did see what she thought was Madeleine being taken away? Hmm

  • 110
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:24 am

    75 tracey

    That is not correct:

    http://tinyurl.com/2lolxq

  • 111
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:24 am

    http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYSjEVslhgOh09hPIpwXbHyNW_bA

    not a ludricous in sight

  • 112
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:25 am

    no rosemary it wasn’t me but thanks for the link. i’ve been following the case.

  • 113
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:27 am

    garth, i love when you say “incredulous�? your beautiful blue eyes roll upwards and then flash brilliantly as they come down. :)

  • 114
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:30 am

    103, Rosemary and Noseycow

    The McCans apparently were bugged - emails, telephone calls and even surviellance of car journeys. Robert Murat was also under surveilance before he was made an argido.

    Noseycow you say,

    “I wouldn’t mind being bugged - might give someone a laugh if they could be bothered to plough through the chaos of my family life!!�?Are you 100% sure about that.

    Would you then agree to the idea of collecting all DNA from birth into a collective database?

    Interesting article,
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/13/genewatch_dna_database/

  • 115
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:31 am

    105, The Real Stig,

    Yes, I think the case is due to resume, do you know more details?

  • 116
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:34 am

    53 rosemary

    What else do we have access to other than offf the shelf software? If you think the German guys effort in unswirling that image was anything less than an incredible bit of work, I can swirl a photo and upload it for you to see how difficult it would have been.

    The guy did an incredible job and it wasn’t easy. I would say he would have had to write his own software to try and reverse the effect of the original software. That isn’t easy because it looks like the data isn’t just altered, some of it is completely lost.

  • 117
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:36 am

    clarence is on this morning

  • 118
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:36 am

    115 rosemary

    Nothing current, though there is a lot that can be found out about the case.

  • 119
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:37 am

    Re surveillance, weren’t the September 11 and July 7 bombers supposedly on watch lists?
    Not exactly infallible, was it?

  • 120
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:38 am

    108 Rodger,

    Robert Murat said this about the PJ (daily mail excerpt July 16th)

    “I am the only suspect and it could take years for them to release me from the investigation. I was questioned all last week but it’s still far from certain what is going to happen.

    “They have to find enough evidence to present a judge with a case, and it appears they do not have enough information to do that.

    “If they let me go it will look like they have no idea and they do not want to do that. There is a huge difference in the mentality of the Portuguese police and detectives in the UK,�?Murat added.

    Last week Murat underwent four days of interrogation by Portuguese police over contradictions in the alibi he gave for the night of 3 May when Madeleine was snatched from the family’s holiday complex.

    Madeleine McCann, aged 4, was snatched on 3 May

    “When anything bad happens in Portugal people disappear, they run and they hide and now I understand why they do it.

    “I have thought about it but it would not be fair on my family. The law here dates back to the days of fascism and it shows. I am putting my life at risk just by speaking like this.�?/P>

  • 121
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:41 am

    116,
    The Real Stig,
    I will have to consult my resident software expert about that, on his return.

  • 122
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:45 am

    Here’s a quote -

    “Gerry McCann told Schindler, “I’m sure most people can imagine how bad it was that first night �?how terrifying it was and, as most parents would say, the parents�?worst nightmare. �?/P>

    They don’t “own�?their responsibilties or their own emotions. With responsibilites, they tend to justify their actions by pointing out that “everyone else�?does x, like go out leaving their kids asleep at home. Or, the authorities in the USA (some organisation that deals with missing kids) said it was OK and correct to put out Madeleine’s photo everywhere, although they were advised by the police that it would be a death sentence if she had been abducted.

    In the quote above, Gerry doesn’t say “It was really bad the first night�?it was a nightmare.�?That would be describing HIS OWN feelings.

    Instead he says “I’m sure MOST PEOPLE CAN IMAGINE how bad it was that first night �?how terrifying it was and, AS MOST PARENTS WOULD SAY, the parents�?worst nightmare. �?/P>

    What he is NOT saying is what HE went through, only what most people would imagine and what most parents would say.

    Narcissists have very shallow affect, they really don’t have many emotions at all, so they imitate what they see in people around them,or they make suggestions and allow us to “fill in�?the appropriate emotions that we would ourselves feel, without actually them having to state it. See how that works in the above statement?

  • 123
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:52 am

    Ok this is stupid, now I have noticed that there are 2 seperate forums going on regarding the McCanns on this site, both dated Oct 9th. Better go, it requires too much time to keep up.

  • 124
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:53 am

    i have honestly never heard kate or gerry say anything expressing concern overe what little madeleine must be feeling or going though. it is very odd the way their interviews have been overwhelmingly about kate and gerry. very little in the way of concern for madeleine. at first i thought it was just because they didn’t wish to ignite their emotions in public. i thought for sure their love and concern would be evident in the written word like gerry’s blog or for f***’s sake on the madeleine site itself but no real sincere emotion at all to be gleaned there either.


  • Reply
     Message 7 of 7 in Discussion 
    From: MSN Nicknametin-lizzySent: 2/12/2008 8:21 PM
  • 100
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:11 am

    78 noseycow

    She was acquitted, which means innocent in the eyes of the law. If you want to consider your opinions superior to the legal system, that is your prerogative. The Paediatricians opinion and expertise was not a minor factor in the case.

  • 101
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:11 am

    80, Will,

    Again that will vary depending on the police force. Would you perfer to be jailed in Thailand or the US for drug charges? Every country has different ethics, policing policies and will exert force according to how they view the offence.

  • 102
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:12 am

    real stig - are you changing youe mind about the use of statistics in court???

  • 103
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:13 am

    98, noseycow,

    I agree, nobody knows what goes on behind closed doors.
    That’s why bugging is so helpful!

  • 104
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:15 am

    with you there Rosemary - I wouldn’t mind being bugged - might give someone a laugh if they could be bothered to plough through the chaos of my family life!!

  • 105
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:16 am

    99 rosemary

    Do you mean a link detailing the current progress and outcome?

  • 106
    Tracey Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:18 am

    Jeez, if they bugged my house they would be carting me off in an instant.

  • 107
    noseycow Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:21 am

    Tracey - I assume we’d all be carted off - just for being on this site!!!! and on that note I’m off to bed - was a long hard night shift..though fortunately no cadavarine (is that how it’s spelt)!!

  • 108
    Roger Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:23 am

    Thea, I am quite prepared to believe that some countries have brutal police forces. Portugal is no stranger to these allegations see for example: CERD 65th session: Report of Portugal; UNITED NATIONS
    Press Release, 13 August 2004- random google page.

    If you get entangled with them then you may have cause to be scared. Police brutality cannot be justified regardless of whether the suspect is later proven to be guilty. If we wish to describe ourselves as civilised we have to maintain some minimum standards.

  • 109
    Garth Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:24 am

    Tony Bennett Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 7:23 am
    Abuse? click date link above, then copy the URL/web address from your browser & email it here
    Computer programs like this are very useful and in this case appear to show that an abductor would have little chance of entering the apartment and removing Madeleine without being seen by one of the ‘Tapas 9�?

    What a load of crap!

    The first thing that strikes me odd about that statement is how the McCann haters find it incredulous that they could of left the tots on their own in that apartment with the ‘out of sight out of mind�?attitude they believe they Mc’s had. Oh and it takes about 5 mins to walk to the apartment. And now it is claimed that there would of been little chance of someone taking Madeleine without being seen due to the regular number of checks!

    So which is it?

    Which ever one suits is the answer.

    Anyway, I thought one of those at the tapas bar did see what she thought was Madeleine being taken away? Hmm

  • 110
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:24 am

    75 tracey

    That is not correct:

    http://tinyurl.com/2lolxq

  • 111
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:24 am

    http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYSjEVslhgOh09hPIpwXbHyNW_bA

    not a ludricous in sight

  • 112
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:25 am

    no rosemary it wasn’t me but thanks for the link. i’ve been following the case.

  • 113
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:27 am

    garth, i love when you say “incredulous�? your beautiful blue eyes roll upwards and then flash brilliantly as they come down. :)

  • 114
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:30 am

    103, Rosemary and Noseycow

    The McCans apparently were bugged - emails, telephone calls and even surviellance of car journeys. Robert Murat was also under surveilance before he was made an argido.

    Noseycow you say,

    “I wouldn’t mind being bugged - might give someone a laugh if they could be bothered to plough through the chaos of my family life!!�?Are you 100% sure about that.

    Would you then agree to the idea of collecting all DNA from birth into a collective database?

    Interesting article,
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/13/genewatch_dna_database/

  • 115
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:31 am

    105, The Real Stig,

    Yes, I think the case is due to resume, do you know more details?

  • 116
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:34 am

    53 rosemary

    What else do we have access to other than offf the shelf software? If you think the German guys effort in unswirling that image was anything less than an incredible bit of work, I can swirl a photo and upload it for you to see how difficult it would have been.

    The guy did an incredible job and it wasn’t easy. I would say he would have had to write his own software to try and reverse the effect of the original software. That isn’t easy because it looks like the data isn’t just altered, some of it is completely lost.

  • 117
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:36 am

    clarence is on this morning

  • 118
    The Real Stig Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:36 am

    115 rosemary

    Nothing current, though there is a lot that can be found out about the case.

  • 119
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:37 am

    Re surveillance, weren’t the September 11 and July 7 bombers supposedly on watch lists?
    Not exactly infallible, was it?

  • 120
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:38 am

    108 Rodger,

    Robert Murat said this about the PJ (daily mail excerpt July 16th)

    “I am the only suspect and it could take years for them to release me from the investigation. I was questioned all last week but it’s still far from certain what is going to happen.

    “They have to find enough evidence to present a judge with a case, and it appears they do not have enough information to do that.

    “If they let me go it will look like they have no idea and they do not want to do that. There is a huge difference in the mentality of the Portuguese police and detectives in the UK,�?Murat added.

    Last week Murat underwent four days of interrogation by Portuguese police over contradictions in the alibi he gave for the night of 3 May when Madeleine was snatched from the family’s holiday complex.

    Madeleine McCann, aged 4, was snatched on 3 May

    “When anything bad happens in Portugal people disappear, they run and they hide and now I understand why they do it.

    “I have thought about it but it would not be fair on my family. The law here dates back to the days of fascism and it shows. I am putting my life at risk just by speaking like this.�?/P>

  • 121
    Rosemary Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:41 am

    116,
    The Real Stig,
    I will have to consult my resident software expert about that, on his return.

  • 122
    brandonflours Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:45 am

    Here’s a quote -

    “Gerry McCann told Schindler, “I’m sure most people can imagine how bad it was that first night �?how terrifying it was and, as most parents would say, the parents�?worst nightmare. �?/P>

    They don’t “own�?their responsibilties or their own emotions. With responsibilites, they tend to justify their actions by pointing out that “everyone else�?does x, like go out leaving their kids asleep at home. Or, the authorities in the USA (some organisation that deals with missing kids) said it was OK and correct to put out Madeleine’s photo everywhere, although they were advised by the police that it would be a death sentence if she had been abducted.

    In the quote above, Gerry doesn’t say “It was really bad the first night�?it was a nightmare.�?That would be describing HIS OWN feelings.

    Instead he says “I’m sure MOST PEOPLE CAN IMAGINE how bad it was that first night �?how terrifying it was and, AS MOST PARENTS WOULD SAY, the parents�?worst nightmare. �?/P>

    What he is NOT saying is what HE went through, only what most people would imagine and what most parents would say.

    Narcissists have very shallow affect, they really don’t have many emotions at all, so they imitate what they see in people around them,or they make suggestions and allow us to “fill in�?the appropriate emotions that we would ourselves feel, without actually them having to state it. See how that works in the above statement?

  • 123
    dora Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:52 am

    Ok this is stupid, now I have noticed that there are 2 seperate forums going on regarding the McCanns on this site, both dated Oct 9th. Better go, it requires too much time to keep up.

  • 124
    thea Says:
    October 9th, 2007 at 10:53 am

    i have honestly never heard kate or gerry say anything expressing concern overe what little madeleine must be feeling or going though. it is very odd the way their interviews have been overwhelmingly about kate and gerry. very little in the way of concern for madeleine. at first i thought it was just because they didn’t wish to ignite their emotions in public. i thought for sure their love and concern would be evident in the written word like gerry’s blog or for f***’s sake on the madeleine site itself but no real sincere emotion at all to be gleaned there either.


  • First  Previous  2-7 of 7  Next  Last 
    Return to Video Links