MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Chemistry Corner[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Welcome Page  
  About This Site  
  Message Boards  
  General  
  Inorganic  
  Organic  
  Pictures  
  Random  
  FOR ALL  
  Handy Symbols  
  Chemistry Humor  
    
  Documents  
  Chemistry Sites I  
  Chemistry Sites II  
  Chemistry Sites III  
  Organic Sites I  
  Organic Sites II  
  Analytical Sites I  
  Analytical Sites II  
  Lesson Plan Sites  
  Online Problems  
  Names & Formulas  
  Naming Exercises  
  Equations I  
  Equations II  
  Eq. Exercises I  
  Eq. Exercises II  
  The Mole I  
  The Mole II  
  Mole Exercises  
  Stoichiometry  
  Stoich. Exercises  
  More Communities  
  School's Out!  
  _________________  
  Site Map  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : A little bit of math
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameAlbert1145  (Original Message)Sent: 3/16/2008 7:25 AM
Hi,

I know this is a chemistry forum, but I have 2 math questions, could someone please help me out?

A small wildlife and climate monitoring unit in Yellow stone National Park requires a constant 1 kW of electricity to operate. Water is diverted from a nearby waterfall to drive a small hydroelectric plant to power the monitoring unit; assume that the water falls a vertical height of 10m.

i) If the hydroelectric pant is 70% efficient, what volume of water per second is required to power the monitoring unit?
ii) A kilowatt hour of electricity generated by a coal fired power station produces about 2.2 kg of C22 emission. If the monitoring unit operates all of the time, calculate the reduction in Co2 emissions in a year that arise from using hydroelectric electricity instead of electricity generated by a coal fired power station.

Sorry!
Thanx


First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname·Steve·Sent: 3/16/2008 8:53 AM
Here's an outline of what you have to do:
 
A watt is one joule per second,   W  =  J/s

A joule is a kg m2 /s2

Work done to lift a mass in a gravitation field  =  mass  X  gravitational constant at Earth's surface  X  change in height

gravitational constant at Earth's surface  =  9.8 m/s2

If one kW of electricity is required, which is 1000 J of energy per second, what mass must change height by 10 meters to do this much work?  We are assuming perfect efficiency for the moment.

1000 kg m2 / s2  =  mass   X   9.8 m/s2   X   10 m

Solve for the mass, which will be in kg units.  This is the mass of water that will produce 1000 J of work by falling a distance of 10 meters.  This is the mass that must fall 10 meters every second to produce 1000 J of electrical energy by the power plant every second, which is 1000 watts or 1 kW.

i)  If the power plant is 70% efficient, it is only converting 70% of the energy of the falling water to electrical work.  The power plant needs to produce 1000 J of energy per second.  Seventy percent of what number equals 1000 J ?  That is, 0.70x = 1000 J, x = 1429 J.  So, what mass of water must fall 10 m to produce 1429 J of work?

ii)  A kWh (kilowatt hour) of electricity is 1000 J/s  X  3600 s  =  3,600,000 J.  The coal-fueled power plant producing this amount of energy produces 2.2 kg of CO2.

If 2.2 kg of CO2 are produced for every 3,600,000 J of energy produced by the coal plant, how many kg of CO2 are produced for every 1000 J of energy?  This would be the kg of CO2 produced every second, and 1000 J is the energy demand per second for this particular power plant.  Multiply this kg of CO2 by the number of seconds in a year to get the kg of CO2 produced by the coal-fueled power plant per year.  This is the amount of CO2 that would not be produced if the power plant was hydroelectric.
 

Steve