MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Great Friends - Good TimesContains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Welcome  
  Rules  
  Bandwidth Theft  
  Member's Quilt  
  In Memory Of LouLouBell  
  NOELEEN'S OFFICE **NEW**  
  Daily Trivia  
  Message Boards  
  
  General  
  
  Newcomers  
  
  ~ * OTD * ~  
  
  Fun For All  
  
  Help And Advice  
  
  A Good Vent  
  
  The Book Club  
  
  The TV Lounge  
  
  Feeling Great!  
  
  SMUTTY BOARD  
  
  Post Box's  
  
  Computer Help  
  
  In The News  
  Chat Abbreviations  
  Recipes To Share  
  In Remembrance  
  Calendar Dates  
  Posting Pictures  
  Pictures  
    
  What did you do at school today?  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Debate & Discuss : Michael Jackson
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknameßratz  (Original Message)Sent: 6/22/2005 12:32 PM
Did he?  Didn't he?
Should he have been convicted?  Do you think they had enough evidence?


First  Previous  2-7 of 7  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameNićSent: 6/22/2005 1:05 PM
I honestly  dont know for sure, he was never going to be convicted though what ever he has done. If he was innocent why after the problem before with a boy complaining did he have children in his room again...very stupid and also the parents who let their children stop there must be mad too....  not sure but definately suss...

Reply
 Message 3 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname»ÐÎzŽzŽzŽỷ«™Sent: 6/22/2005 4:13 PM
The prosecution took 9 weeks and the defence took 3 weeks to dismantle it, actually cutting short an expected 8 week run of defence evidence. The odds were stacked against MJ and it's all credit to the jury for looking at the facts in this case and not allowing themselves to be influenced by media speculation which has gone on for years. I hope for the kids sakes that nothing of the alligations went on .
I personally think the mans ill and has been for years. Allowing children who are not your own to sleep in the bed next to you will always sound alarm bells.
Hes a 45 yr old man who`s been very nieave and silly. I hope he now stops and thinks of the actions hes showing the world. So what if he has porn in his house or looked at it on the pc... im sure not many people in this world can say they have never had a look or searched on it.
The only people who knew what went on is MJ and the boy.

Reply
 Message 4 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameghaensSent: 6/22/2005 4:21 PM
I don't know to be honest. Some of the jury have said that they based their decision purely on the fact that they didn't like the boys mother and how she conducted herself.
 
I'd like to think he was innocent. He always struck me as asexual... is that the right word?

Reply
 Message 5 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamemummycoolSent: 6/22/2005 9:50 PM
I dont think any of us will ever know for sure, but I'm inclined to think it was all done 'innocently', I mean hes not all there is he?  He's kind of like a child himself, but he really should think before he acts.

Reply
 Message 6 of 7 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameßratzSent: 6/23/2005 12:30 PM
I'm much like you Noe, think he is asexual.  BUT, he did allow the boys to drink, and I think they should have gone for what they COULD prove.  The barriers he is not putting up between adult and child can cause some major mental problems with those kids.  Oh, and the fact that he is a dad, SCARY!!!

Reply
 Message 7 of 7 in Discussion 
From: sweetpeaSent: 10/8/2005 2:31 AM
He's a few cards short of a deck, for sure....but aren't all entertainers??
He is an enigma to me - I have no clue what is what where he is concerned.  I feel badly for his children - what an eccentric man to have in charge of one's life!!!!!(never mind what may or may not go on ), and I feel badly for him.
He was one King of Pop and now he is pretty much a has-been who has no clue that his glory days have dimmed or that the publicity this sort of thing generates, is really sad!
All in all a totally tragic life for anyone.

First  Previous  2-7 of 7  Next  Last 
Return to Debate & Discuss