MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : Beware the "heart healthy monounsatures" advice.
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 1 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  (Original Message)Sent: 8/7/2007 12:15 AM
It's true that high-quality olive oil (fresh and not cooked) is not unhealthy, but other oils considered to be "monounsaturates" are, such as canola and rapeseed. I noticed that a lot of "junk food" now contains rapeseed oil, which can be very dangerous. The problem is that many if not most "nutritional experts" seem to feel compelled to think in terms of abstract categories that do not correspond to any reality. Rapeseed oil contains not only significant amounts of omega 3s, which go rancid quickly, but also contain significant amounts of Erucic acid, which is monounsaturated, but very unhealthy. I saw a TV show about a medical examiner, and it was a case of a young, obese woman who died for no apparent reason. It turned out to be thrombosis, but the ME pointed out the the woman's heart had an incredible amount of pulmonary fibrosis.

The Merck Source Dictionary has this to say about Erucic acid:

QUOTE: ...a monounsaturated 22-carbon fatty acid occurring as a major constituent of most rapeseed and mustard oils. Because erucic acid has been linked to cardiac muscle damage, edible canola oil products are prepared from low erucic acid varieties of rapeseed plants... UNQUOTE.

Source: http://www.mercksource.com/pp/us/cns/cns_hl_dorlands.jspz
QzpgzEzzSzppdocszSzuszSzcommonzSzdorlandszSzdorlandzSzdmd_e_14zPzhtm

And here is some actual evidence:

QUOTE: ...Various hypotheses has been put forward to explain the high incidence of conduction system disorders in the Eastern part of the country. Mustard oil is the usual cooking medium in the Eastern part of the country. Erucic acid content of Mustard oil is around 48%. Studies conducted by the Indian Council of Medical Research [4] has shown erucic acid content in all the 50 heart samples obtained from Calcutta (Eastern part of India) while none of the samples from Trivandrum or Madras (South India) showed any trace of erucic acid. The cooking medium in the latter regions is coconut oil, with no erucic acid content. Erucic acid has been shown to produce myocardial fibrosis and lipidosis... UNQUOTE.

Source: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2002 April–June; 2(2): 57�?1. Published online 2002 April 1.

And today there was the following report:

QUOTE: Mortality rates from pulmonary fibrosis (PF) have increased significantly in recent years, and are predicted to continue to rise, according to researchers from the University of Colorado... UNQUOTE.

Source: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/08/070801091334.htm

It just amazes me how clear the evidence is and yet how misguided or outright wrong the advice given by most "experts" is.


First  Previous  No Replies  Next  Last