Hi again Angie
Every year the U.S. Department of Social Security in the United States puts out a list of the twenty most popular baby names for a given year. I thought it might be interesting to take a look at the most popular names from 2006 and look at them in terms of their auspicious or inauspicious numerology. As these figures are given to millions of children it might also tell us a bit about the type of life paths that children of the next generation might follow and how that may shape our collective destiny.
In 2005 (the most recently available date) the twenty most popular names for boys were
1. Jacob = 4 2. Michael = 6 3. Joshua = 2 4. Matthew = 9 5. Ethan = 3 6. Andrew = 11 7. Daniel = 9 8. Anthony = 7 9. Christopher = 4 10. Joseph = 1 11. William = 7 12. Alexander = 3 13. Ryan = 4 14. David = 4 15. Nicholas = 9 16. Tyler = 8 17. James =3 18. John = 2 19. Jonathan = 2 20. Nathan = 4
According to figures provided on the Social Security website his means just over 5% of the babies in the U.S. population are currently named Jacob (the first name) and just over 1% are named Nathan (the last name on the list)
The unluckiest names on this list are Jacob (the most popular boy's name in the country), Christopher, Ryan, David and Nathan. These names add up to a 4, which can represent a path of hardship and struggle. As we are only looking at first names here, this number is a sub number that could represent challenges in the life path. It also means that one quarter of those in the top boy baby names groups will probably lead a life where they are struggling to survive in one way or another. The 4 names by the way represent about 17% of the population.
What also stands out is the astounding lack of leaders in this group with only one name - Joseph - adding up to a 1. There is also only one master number - the 11 that is assigned to the name Andrew that in total represents about 2% of the population. There is also only 1 name out of the twenty that calculates to a wealth number - Tyler which adds up to a an 8 that represents 1% of the population. Also surprisingly there are no 5's, which can mean a lack of travel (which I hope isn't due to a shortage of fuel!) 5 is also the number of the soldier so hopefully this means there will not be a need for them 20 years from now.
Aside from these two extremes, 2's and 9's make up the majority of the group which means just under a quarter of them would find true love (2) (statistically about 5% of the population) and yet another quarter of them would be wounded healers or on a lonely karmic path (9). If you look at the population percentages it means about 7% find true love and about 7% will also spend their lives a seekers.
If we look at the above as a sampling of a trend it may also mean that by the time this group is 20 years old they will more than likely be a pedestrian, hard working populace that is struggling to maintain the good of the whole. They will probably not be individualists as is indicated by all of the 6's and 4's which is more about being on a treadmill rather than making great strides when it comes to progress.
The 20 most popular girl's names in 2005 were
1. Emily = 1 2. Emma = 5 3. Madison = 3 4. Abigail = 5 5. Olivia = 5 6. Isabella = 7 7. Hannah = 1 8. Samantha = 5 9. Ava = 6 10. Ashley = 7 11. Sophia = 5 12. Elizabeth = 7 13. Alexis = 7 14. Grace = 7 15. Sarah = 2 16. Alyssa = 5 17. Mia = 5 18. Natalie = 8 19. Chloe = 2 20. Brianna =5
What immediately stands out with these names is the incredible number of 5's. There are seven names on this top baby names for girls list that equal to a number that means never being married. However it is also the number of freedom and independence. Statistically, given the number of women with these names in the future makes up about 19% of the total population (and that's just the women with these names!)
There are also 5 names on this list that equal the number 7, which is a number of brilliance but also a number that can mean loneliness, isolation and mental illness (statistically over 17% of the female population will grow up with any of these names.) Over 50% of the names on this list are not auspicious and in fact add up to numbers that imply loneliness or detachment.
Even stranger is that there is only one name on the list that does add up to family happiness and that is Chloe (that adds up to a 2). This probably means there will be more divorced women or single mothers than ever before.
There are no master numbers and only one name adds up to being a wealth number (8) - Natalie. That name represents less than 1% of the population.
Both lists share the following common characteristics:
A lack of 6's - the number of raising a family or living in extended families. This likely means that this generation will be less inclined to be suburban in nature.
A lack of 8's - unfortunately this can mean a general lack of prosperity might be a trend for the future.
A lack of master numbers - this can indicate a lack of entrepreneurs or leaders
A preponderance of 5's - marriage may be a "dirty" word or outmoded concept in the future.
A preponderance of 7's - mental illness may also be a growing problem in the future.
In the next newsletter we will look towards the past to see if the baby boomers had it any better and if it would be somehow more fortuitous to give your baby girl or boy a more old fashioned name.
|