MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The History Page[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Boards  
  For New Members  
  On This Day....  
  General  
  American History  
  Ancient History  
  British History  
  Current Events  
  European History  
  The Civil War  
  War  
  World History  
  Pictures  
    
    
  Links  
  Militaria Board  
  Cars/Motorcycles  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Militaria Board : The Biggest
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamefunkmasterjee  (Original Message)Sent: 7/26/2007 3:45 PM
Biggest bomber of WW2;
 
The biggest bomber of World War II, a B-29 Superfortress, is on display at the New England Air Museum in Windsor Locks, Conn.
The biggest bomber of World War II, a B-29 Superfortress, is on display at the New England Air Museum in Windsor Locks, Conn.
 
 
Biggest Bomb ever;
 
Tsar Bomba Construction
On October 30, 1961

Ivan�?sometimes referred to as "Tsar Bomba" or "King of Bombs"�?was originally designed to yield a 100 megaton explosion, but the soviets decided that such a blast would create too great a risk of nuclear fallout, and an almost certain chance that the release plane would be unable to reach safety before detonation. Prior to testing, the engineers replaced a portion of the radioactive uranium with a lead tamper, cutting its explosive potential in half, to a "mere" 50 megatons. Later analysis showed that the fallout from a 100 megaton detonation would have resulted in lethal levels of radioactive fallout over an enormous area.

Even at half strength, Ivan was so powerful that it was completely impractical. Much of the explosion's energy radiated upwards into space, and that which didn't was so excessive that using the device on any populated targets world would have resulted in adverse effects on Russian interests. It served as nothing more than a show of force, and in that respect, it served its purpose well. Thankfully, no other weapon with the massive destructive power of Tsar Bomba has ever been built.

 

Biggest tank ever built;   Panzer VIII - Maus

Maus

Weight;  188,000 kg

Armament;  128mm KwK 44 L/55 & 75mm KwK 44 L/36.5
1 x 7.92mm MG34

Crew;  6

Overall, Maus was an interesting design but it would be of limited combat value because of its poor mobility and heavy weight making it more of a mobile fortification rather than a super tank. One fully assembled example (V2 turret mounted on V1 hull) was tested at Kubinka in 1951/52 and can be seen today in the Museum of Armored Forces in Kubinka (near Moscow) in Russia.

 

The worlds biggest warship

Image:USS Nimitz in Victoria Canada 036.jpg

The United States Navy’s Nimitz-Class nuclear powered aircraft carriers are the biggest warships ever built. Over 300 metres long, and displacing in excess of 100,000 tons, they have a crew of more than 5000 men and women. Each ship can carry approximately 80 aircraft.

The biggest battleships were the Imperial Japanese Navy’s Musashi and Yamato, 72,000 tons displacement, with armour over 16 inches thick and armed with nine 18.1-inch guns. Musashi was sunk in 1944, Yamato in 1945, by American aircraft.

Image:Yamatotrials.jpg

 

Biggest WW2 bomb;

22,000lb 'Grand Slam'

Image:Grand slam bomb.jpg

The Grand Slam (Earth Quake bomb), was a very large freefall bomb developed by the British aeronautical engineer Barnes Wallis (who also made the bouncing bomb) in late 1944. At a weight of 9.98 t (22,000 lb) the Grand Slam was almost twice the weight of his previous large bomb, the 5.44 t (12,000 lb) Tallboy. Both weapons were intended for use against large and protected buildings, structures against which smaller bombs would be ineffective. The name grand slam comes from the game of bridge, where it is a term that means winning all the tricks, "cleaning the table".

When it was calculated that the Avro Lancaster B1 Special bombers used for Tallboy could carry an even larger bomb, work started on the Grand Slam, which was effectively a scaled-up Tallboy. The new design was highly aerodynamic, with a long tail incorporating offset fins, causing it to spin as it fell and stabilizing it, due to the gyroscopic effect, much as the spin imparted by the rifling of a gun barrel increases the accuracy of a bullet. The spin also allowed the bomb to reach supersonic speeds, as the increased stability enabled it to pass through the sound barrier without wobbling or being thrown off-course.

The Grand Slam had a much thicker case than typical World War II bombs, so it would survive the impact of hitting a hardened surface. The hardened steel bomb casing was cast in one piece in a sand mould using a concrete core. Torpex was then poured in, bucket by bucket. When filled, the hot molten explosive took a month to cool down and set, greatly limiting production. Like the Tallboy, the rate of production and material and manpower investment in each bomb meant that aircrews were told to land with their unused bombs on board, rather than jettison them into the sea if a sortie was aborted.

When dropped from high altitude onto compacted earth, the Grand Slam would penetrate over 40 metres into the ground. The explosion would leave a camouflet (cavern) which would undermine foundations of structures above, causing collapse. This is what happened to the Bielefeld railway viaduct, the first enemy target destroyed by a Grand Slam.

Post-war the Handley Page Victor was designed with the provision to carry either a single Grand Slam, or two of the smaller Tallboys, internally.

The bomb was also built in the US where it was designated as "Bomb, GP, 22,000-lb, M110 (T-14)". The US developed a larger bomb using the same principles as the Grand Slam, the T-12 Cloudmaker, which weighed 20,000 kg (44,000 lb) , but it was not employed operationally.



First  Previous  40-54 of 54  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 40 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 1/11/2008 8:58 PM
The Soviets occupied Treblinka, Buchenwald, etc etc and carried on even worse. I suggest we didn't bomb concentration campd for fear of hurting our Soviet Allies.
 
Google below. Para one I disagree with

During World War II the U.S. Army forced approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans, two-thirds of whom were American citizens, from their primarily West Coast homes to ten concentration camps, many in the interior of the country. The U.S. government referred to these prisonlike camps as relocation centers. See also Japanese American Internment.

III

Soviet Camps

In Russia the Bolsheviks established concentration camps for suspected counterrevolutionaries in 1918 after the Russian Revolution. During the 1920s, “class enemies�?and criminals were confined in the Northern Special Purpose Camps on the Solovetskiye Islands in the White Sea and near Arkhangel’sk on the mainland. In the 1930s and 1940s, a system of corrective labor camps covered most of the Soviet Union and received millions of prisoners in successive waves of mass arrests: independent farmers (kulaks); victims of the great purges; populations deported from the Polish and Baltic territories annexed in 1939; groups such as the Volga Germans considered potentially disloyal during World War II; Axis prisoners of war; and Russians returning from German captivity. After the death of Joseph Stalin (1953), when many inmates received amnesty and were released, the camps continued on a smaller scale.



Reply
 Message 41 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 1/11/2008 9:01 PM
Incidentally, I mean no support for the Germans.
Was the idea to bomb the camps or the railway lines? I don't think the inhabitants would have thanked us, delaying food deliveries and incurring reprisals.

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 42 of 54 in Discussion 
Sent: 1/11/2008 9:31 PM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 43 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 1/11/2008 10:00 PM
I did not express myself well. I mean i have no sympathy for the Nisei japs. Those in the camps didn't have to fight for the USA

Reply
 Message 44 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman8Sent: 1/11/2008 10:04 PM
Maybe I'm a trifled jaundiced by the way British non combatant Colonials in Hong Kong, Singapore, etc were treated by the japs.
Or did you bayonet and rape wholesale and work them to death too? Did you have your |Bataan death marches?

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 45 of 54 in Discussion 
Sent: 1/11/2008 10:17 PM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 46 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 2/22/2008 5:10 PM
 
The largest aircraft Sunday has fitted into. What is it? 

Reply
 Message 47 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMOREREPETESSent: 2/23/2008 1:25 AM
IT LOOKS A LOT LIKE THE FLIGHT SIMULATOR WE HAD IN HIGH SCHOOL.

Reply
 Message 48 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 2/23/2008 11:57 AM
No, it was a real-life flying dwarf air force conveyance. Ask Sunday.
 
  
AIR-SEA RESCUE.

Reply
 Message 49 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 2/23/2008 8:14 PM
As Sunday must be the founder of the Midget Air force, I have included a few more. Tiny tank gunners welcome.
 
Baby Bird. 50 HP engine, more than Bleroit had. Joint smallest piston engine with
 
Bumble bee biplane
 
 
This amazes me. Tiniest twin and jet engined can do 180 mph, engines are from model aircraft. The Cri-Cri (Cricket) 100 made on France alone. Make a change from the Broomstick, Sunday.

Reply
 Message 50 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHobbs410Sent: 2/24/2008 10:57 AM
The blue one looks like it has the engine Marilyn was working on the other post. I couldn't even fit in it.

Reply
 Message 51 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 2/24/2008 2:38 PM
Hobbs
I was spendin more time looking at the machinery of course. No, that was a horizontally opposed twin. The engine. I mean.

Reply
 Message 52 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 2/24/2008 2:57 PM
You're right, Hobbes. There's a teensy weensy chance you might not have  fitted into Marilyn Monroe's aircraft. PBA and Sunday would have rattled around inside like peas in a pod. But for peoiple of a more normal build, no.
You see when that pic was taken she was working for

Marilyn Monroe at Hollywood.com

While working at the Radio Plane Company factory in Burbank, she had her picture taken by a visiting Army photographer.... Full Bio , Awards & Milestones ...
www.hollywood.com/celebrity/Marilyn_Monroe/196401 - 82k - <NOBR>Cached - Similar pages</NOBR>

<NOBR>Now, I assume they weren't building Spruce Gooses, so I assume that was a </NOBR>

<NOBR>target drone aircraft.</NOBR>

 


Reply
 Message 53 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHobbs410Sent: 2/24/2008 3:03 PM
You cannot possibly expect me to believ that the engine was better looking than Marilyn.

Reply
 Message 54 of 54 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameFlashman191Sent: 2/24/2008 8:01 PM
Well, it was beautifully shaped, moulded , finished with a waxy reflection, and in lovely proportions.
As for the engine..........

First  Previous  40-54 of 54  Next  Last 
Return to Militaria Board