 |
|
Reply
| |
I'm Dr. R. Charbonneau Ph.D. in astrophysics and an engineer as well. I am the fellow who published (turned down of course) to SA, Sky & Telescope, et hoc genus omne, that Sol (our sun) was composed of layers, specifically a second layer beneath the photosphere (surface) that was responsible for sunspots and solar flares. This was confirmed by NASA/ESA's Project SOHO between 2003 and 2005 through several orbits and bombardments. I am fighting with NASA for the proper credit of this, but that's irrelevant. The work evolved out of my research in gravity that began when I was 17 (I'm 54 now). The same work led to research in fusion and I found a decisive conflict between the conversion of 3H to He and the Van Der Waals strain forces. This suggested that sustained fusion for more than a fleeting moment was not possible and there would never be an intrinsic breakeven. Pulsed fusion made more sense and no such conflict, so the new model of a class G2 star evolved. Much has now been proven, still I feel what they are amalgamating from their readings beyond the second layer is misinterpretted as entirely fluid. The model of what the Charbonneau layer actually does is more in line with heat exchange and conversion of the 2H2O fuel that is above it like an ocean and superheated steam above that. The readings of this would give the same heat results and those could easily be up to interpretation. The layer converts the Deuterium into at least Tritium and suggests the possibility of a new isotope: Quinterium (or perhaps Penterium) that would be cyclic, strained, puckered and thus more energetic and unstable. It also accounts for the 40% neutrino count without the fanciful need for "morphose" neutrinos. I'll offer more about gravity. (I find it to be a "pushing" force rather than mass attraction and the numbers come out the same...) From what I see so far, there's quite a bit of medical knowledge in here. Over the past few years I've morphed my chemistry skills into bio-chemistry and now I'm studying medicine from the scientific frame of reference. The work I have involves porphyrins and chlorins as they relate to hemoglobins and myoglobins. It may be possible to synthesize a heme with ligands polarized and shaped as a pseudo-antigen that would attract the mutant T-cells in an MS patient to bind them into a heme component that can be filtered out through the nephrons, while the reciprocal ligand forms myoglobins to rebuild the damaged nerves as they are absorbed through the arterial walls onto the myelin. Any thoughts on any of this? Dr. C. |
|
 First
Previous
2-8 of 8
Next
Last
|
|
Reply
| |
I'm an anonymous historian who runs this site. After developing a wasting disorder which baffled my doctors, I decided that I had better learn about medicine, biology, biochemistry, etc., in order to cure myself. Because I had made the scientific method one of the cornerstones of many of the classes I taught, I was amazed at how easily so many scientists simply ignore the scientific method, even when validation/refutation experiments would be easy and cheap to do.
I can't speak to the first part of your post, but I do find the obvious question, why does gravity exist, to be interesting. If you want to speak about that, I'd be interested in it. As to the biochemistry/medicine, I'm more interested in the maintenance of health and the prevention of disease, rather than how to deal with the aftermath of "diseases" that should have been prevented in the first place. If I had to "sum up," I'd say that most diseases are now due to "inflammation," which is another way of saying arachidonic acid overload. Lipid peroxidation is part of this problem, and in general the best thing to do is to avoid highly unsaturated fat sources as well as dietary oxidized cholesterol. I suggest you take time to read the essays on this site, and any posts in the two newsgroups that interest you. Then you will understand my position in detail. Of course, if you are interested in discussing something else, feel free to do so, but remember that the point of this site is to explore scientific ideas that are contrary to the current dogma, or are not well known (and hence are not found in most, if any relevant textbooks). |
|
Reply
| |
I'd say, to a degree, we are on the same page about some issues. Baffling disorders? I have many symptoms of ALS, but my current neurologist says CTS, despite the fact that I'm right handed and have no habitual repetative strain events in my left hand where the problem exists in its fullest as well as (he tested this) no feeling in the tops of my feet. Sporadic ALS seems to fit the symptoms best, but I'm not a medical doctor, so who am I to self diagnose? Gravity? We would first need to examine how Einstein welded together light and gravity, then take it one step further and couple it to time. Quite a trinity, eh? |
|
Reply
| |
If I hadn't "self-diagnosed," I'd be dead now, so I'll just add that you can apply the scientific method to your problem (doctors later confirmed by diagnoses). One thing to do is to eliminate possible causes and give it a few months. At this point, obviously, I don't have enough information to even guess at possible causes. For example, does any other "blood" relative have this condition, or a similar one? What is your diet like? Do you stress certain parts of your bodies in ways that are unusual? What about mineral/vitamin supplements? Etc.
As to gravity, I've seen some TV shows on string theory, but it seems like it should be called a string hypothesis, at best. I've found the biological fields much more interesting, because things like health and longevity are involved, and one can experiment on oneself. One thing you might want to explain here is why you conceive of gravity as more of a pushing force. Also, let's say there was an announcement tomorrow, and everything was resolved - a grand, unified field theory was discovered. It would supply details, of course, but we already know that everything does "work," and the only question is exactly how?
On the other hand, there are all kinds of contradictory health, medical, dietary, and biological claims (have you been to www.gilbertling.org). Moreover, it should be a lot easier to use the scientific method here than in string theory, and yet decades go by, and old, directly-refuted dogma persists. Thus, there are also social, political, economic, and psychological issues involved. Being trained as a "social scientist," I can't help but to find these things interesting as well. |
|
Reply
| |
Regarding the health issues. Been there. Done that. Parkinson's runs in the family and so does cancer. The PD seems tro skip a generation, but we'll never know that for sure because my grandmother committed suicide long before our immediate family began. My diet is fine. My B12 levels check out (tested). This is the possible antagonist: Solvents. I've been using them since I was a child. Repetative strain isn't there because I do so many different activities over the period of a day and seldom the same ones day after day. My keyboard at home is in a good, low position as I designed and built my work center to be just that way. That possibility of being dead in a few years is a real concern, so I'm working hard to find the funds for tests, etc. Doctors are too much "moneymakers" nowadays... Gravity pushing is a real involved subject and these text editors don't favor equation editing, so I'll make a simple example. create a block, or perhaps a dodecahedron of window screens face to face. Place it in a kids' wagon and hit it from one side with a high pressure stream of water. The "Radio Flyer" will move in the direction of the stream, assuming it is tangent to the wheel axels. More later. Dr. C. |
|
Reply
| |
cody, My approach is polyultrasonics. Any invader can be broken to pieces with the right set of frequencies, strengths, et hoc genus omne. Plaque could be broken up in an artery. The problem is plaque replaces much of the arteriol wall, so removing it removes needed tissue, like backflushing your cooling system in the car. In that, a "push-pull" time of device to generate the wave fields would need be generated and we'd have to rely on computers to time the sequences and synthesize the polyphonic waves. It also relies on total assessment of the person's genetic sequences. This can be accomplished through NMR then processed with programs like "BLAST" from Dr. James Kent (Cal Tech I think...) My online time is limited as is my means to perform research beyond theory. Hope that changes this year...  |
|
Reply
| | From:  cody019 | Sent: 12/16/2007 3:23 PM |
Very interesting. Part of my approach deals with frequencies, too. However, I deal only with body frequencies. There are several ways to increase your body's frequencies, which will raise your vitality levels and improve your immune system along with the rest of your body functions. No danger involved. One way is the KI Method found at the King Institute site. The other method I use is products from DNR which contain the energies of botanicals in a mineral water solution. Some of their products are for internal use and some are for soaking in. All of their products raise the body's own energy levels and help your body remove toxins, debris, heavy metals, parasites, and whatever else needs to come out, and restore the function of all organs, glands, and body sysytems. Again, no danger involved. Also, both are available right now! Take care, Cody |
|
|
First
Previous
2-8 of 8
Next
Last
|
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Return to General