I'm Dr. R. Charbonneau Ph.D. in astrophysics and an engineer as well. I am the fellow who published (turned down of course) to SA, Sky & Telescope, et hoc genus omne, that Sol (our sun) was composed of layers, specifically a second layer beneath the photosphere (surface) that was responsible for sunspots and solar flares. This was confirmed by NASA/ESA's Project SOHO between 2003 and 2005 through several orbits and bombardments. I am fighting with NASA for the proper credit of this, but that's irrelevant.

The work evolved out of my research in gravity that began when I was 17 (I'm 54 now). The same work led to research in fusion and I found a decisive conflict between the conversion of ³H to He and the Van Der Waals strain forces. This suggested that sustained fusion for more than a fleeting moment was not possible and there would never be an intrinsic breakeven. Pulsed fusion made more sense and no such conflict, so the new model of a class G2 star evolved. Much has now been proven, still I feel what they are amalgamating from their readings beyond the second layer is misinterpretted as entirely fluid.

The model of what the Charbonneau layer actually does is more in line with heat exchange and conversion of the ²H₂O fuel that is above it like an ocean and superheated steam above that. The readings of this would give the same heat results and those could easily be up to interpretation.

The layer converts the Deuterium into at least Tritium and suggests the possibility of a new isotope: Quinterium (or perhaps Penterium) that would be cyclic, strained, puckered and thus more energetic and unstable. It also accounts for the 40% neutrino count without the fanciful need for "morphose" neutrinos.

 

I'll offer more about gravity. (I find it to be a "pushing" force rather than mass attraction and the numbers come out the same...)

 

From what I see so far, there's quite a bit of medical knowledge in here. Over the past few years I've morphed my chemistry skills into bio-chemistry and now I'm studying medicine from the scientific frame of reference. The work I have involves porphyrins and chlorins as they relate to hemoglobins and myoglobins. It may be possible to synthesize a heme with ligands polarized and shaped as a pseudo-antigen that would attract the mutant T-cells in an MS patient to bind them into a heme component that can be filtered out through the nephrons, while the reciprocal ligand forms myoglobins to rebuild the damaged nerves as they are absorbed through the arterial walls onto the myelin.

 

Any thoughts on any of this?

 

Dr. C.